Ward Beullens, Ming-Shing Chen, Shih-Hao Hung, Matthias J. Kannwischer, Bo-Yuan Peng, Cheng-Jhih Shih, Bo-Yin Yang
{"title":"油和醋:现代参数和实现","authors":"Ward Beullens, Ming-Shing Chen, Shih-Hao Hung, Matthias J. Kannwischer, Bo-Yuan Peng, Cheng-Jhih Shih, Bo-Yin Yang","doi":"10.46586/tches.v2023.i3.321-365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two multivariate digital signature schemes, Rainbow and GeMSS, made it into the third round of the NIST PQC competition. However, neither made its way to being a standard due to devastating attacks (in one case by Beullens, the other by Tao, Petzoldt, and Ding). How should multivariate cryptography recover from this blow? We propose that, rather than trying to fix Rainbow and HFEv- by introducing countermeasures, the better approach is to return to the classical Oil and Vinegar scheme. We show that, if parametrized appropriately, Oil and Vinegar still provides competitive performance compared to the new NIST standards by most measures (except for key size). At NIST security level 1, this results in either 128-byte signatures with 44 kB public keys or 96-byte signatures with 67 kB public keys. We revamp the state-of-the-art of Oil and Vinegar implementations for the Intel/AMD AVX2, the Arm Cortex-M4 microprocessor, the Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA, and the Armv8-A microarchitecture with the Neon vector instructions set.","PeriodicalId":13186,"journal":{"name":"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.","volume":"17 1","pages":"321-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil and Vinegar: Modern Parameters and Implementations\",\"authors\":\"Ward Beullens, Ming-Shing Chen, Shih-Hao Hung, Matthias J. Kannwischer, Bo-Yuan Peng, Cheng-Jhih Shih, Bo-Yin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.46586/tches.v2023.i3.321-365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two multivariate digital signature schemes, Rainbow and GeMSS, made it into the third round of the NIST PQC competition. However, neither made its way to being a standard due to devastating attacks (in one case by Beullens, the other by Tao, Petzoldt, and Ding). How should multivariate cryptography recover from this blow? We propose that, rather than trying to fix Rainbow and HFEv- by introducing countermeasures, the better approach is to return to the classical Oil and Vinegar scheme. We show that, if parametrized appropriately, Oil and Vinegar still provides competitive performance compared to the new NIST standards by most measures (except for key size). At NIST security level 1, this results in either 128-byte signatures with 44 kB public keys or 96-byte signatures with 67 kB public keys. We revamp the state-of-the-art of Oil and Vinegar implementations for the Intel/AMD AVX2, the Arm Cortex-M4 microprocessor, the Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA, and the Armv8-A microarchitecture with the Neon vector instructions set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"321-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2023.i3.321-365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2023.i3.321-365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
两个多元数字签名方案Rainbow和GeMSS进入了NIST PQC竞赛的第三轮。然而,由于毁灭性的攻击(一个是Beullens的攻击,另一个是Tao、Petzoldt和Ding的攻击),这两种方法都没有成为标准。多元密码学应该如何从这种打击中恢复过来?我们建议,与其试图通过引入对策来修复Rainbow和HFEv,更好的方法是回到经典的油醋方案。我们表明,如果适当地参数化,与新的NIST标准相比,Oil and Vinegar在大多数衡量标准(除了密钥大小)上仍然具有竞争力。在NIST安全级别1中,这将产生具有44 kB公钥的128字节签名或具有67 kB公钥的96字节签名。我们使用Neon矢量指令集改造了Intel/AMD AVX2、Arm Cortex-M4微处理器、Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA和Armv8-A微架构的最先进的Oil and Vinegar实现。
Oil and Vinegar: Modern Parameters and Implementations
Two multivariate digital signature schemes, Rainbow and GeMSS, made it into the third round of the NIST PQC competition. However, neither made its way to being a standard due to devastating attacks (in one case by Beullens, the other by Tao, Petzoldt, and Ding). How should multivariate cryptography recover from this blow? We propose that, rather than trying to fix Rainbow and HFEv- by introducing countermeasures, the better approach is to return to the classical Oil and Vinegar scheme. We show that, if parametrized appropriately, Oil and Vinegar still provides competitive performance compared to the new NIST standards by most measures (except for key size). At NIST security level 1, this results in either 128-byte signatures with 44 kB public keys or 96-byte signatures with 67 kB public keys. We revamp the state-of-the-art of Oil and Vinegar implementations for the Intel/AMD AVX2, the Arm Cortex-M4 microprocessor, the Xilinx Artix-7 FPGA, and the Armv8-A microarchitecture with the Neon vector instructions set.