{"title":"竞争过程和治理结构的演变","authors":"Ricketts Martin","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cet article examine la concurrence entre des structures de gouvernance des entreprises. Il y est souligne quune panoplie de structures constitutionnelles peut etre observee dans le cadre marchand et que cette variete a servi des objectifs transactionnels importants sur un plan historique. Larticle met en contraste les approches coasienne et autrichienne de lexplication des structures de gouvernance. Nous examinons la tendance recente du deplacement de la propriete des entreprises vers les investisseurs par opposition aux arrangements cooperatifs et mutuels. L a r gument a t ion sout i ent que lintervention etatique peut etre une explication importante des tendances recentes au Royaume Uni, notamment dans le domaine des institutions financieres. Les suggestions selon lesquelles des modeles de gouvernance des entreprises par les partenaires devraient etre introduits a travers lintervention de lEtat ignorent a la fois les couts de transaction et limportance dassurer laffectation du talent entrepreneurial en direction des ressources economiques.This paper considers competition between governance arrangements for firms. It is argued that a variety of constitutional structures can be observed in the market and that historically this variety has served important transactional purposes. The Coasian and Austrian approaches to the explanation of governance arrangements are contrasted. Recent trends towards investor ownership of firms and away from co-operative and mutual arrangements are considered. It is argued that government regulatory intervention may be an important explanation for recent trends in the UK, especially in the area of financial institutions. Suggestions that stakeholder models of firm governance should be introduced through state intervention ignore considerations both of transactions costs and the importance of ensuring the allocation of entrepreneurial talent to the direction of economic resources.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive Processes and the Evolution of Governance Structures\",\"authors\":\"Ricketts Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1145-6396.1147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cet article examine la concurrence entre des structures de gouvernance des entreprises. Il y est souligne quune panoplie de structures constitutionnelles peut etre observee dans le cadre marchand et que cette variete a servi des objectifs transactionnels importants sur un plan historique. Larticle met en contraste les approches coasienne et autrichienne de lexplication des structures de gouvernance. Nous examinons la tendance recente du deplacement de la propriete des entreprises vers les investisseurs par opposition aux arrangements cooperatifs et mutuels. L a r gument a t ion sout i ent que lintervention etatique peut etre une explication importante des tendances recentes au Royaume Uni, notamment dans le domaine des institutions financieres. Les suggestions selon lesquelles des modeles de gouvernance des entreprises par les partenaires devraient etre introduits a travers lintervention de lEtat ignorent a la fois les couts de transaction et limportance dassurer laffectation du talent entrepreneurial en direction des ressources economiques.This paper considers competition between governance arrangements for firms. It is argued that a variety of constitutional structures can be observed in the market and that historically this variety has served important transactional purposes. The Coasian and Austrian approaches to the explanation of governance arrangements are contrasted. Recent trends towards investor ownership of firms and away from co-operative and mutual arrangements are considered. It is argued that government regulatory intervention may be an important explanation for recent trends in the UK, especially in the area of financial institutions. Suggestions that stakeholder models of firm governance should be introduced through state intervention ignore considerations both of transactions costs and the importance of ensuring the allocation of entrepreneurial talent to the direction of economic resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competitive Processes and the Evolution of Governance Structures
Cet article examine la concurrence entre des structures de gouvernance des entreprises. Il y est souligne quune panoplie de structures constitutionnelles peut etre observee dans le cadre marchand et que cette variete a servi des objectifs transactionnels importants sur un plan historique. Larticle met en contraste les approches coasienne et autrichienne de lexplication des structures de gouvernance. Nous examinons la tendance recente du deplacement de la propriete des entreprises vers les investisseurs par opposition aux arrangements cooperatifs et mutuels. L a r gument a t ion sout i ent que lintervention etatique peut etre une explication importante des tendances recentes au Royaume Uni, notamment dans le domaine des institutions financieres. Les suggestions selon lesquelles des modeles de gouvernance des entreprises par les partenaires devraient etre introduits a travers lintervention de lEtat ignorent a la fois les couts de transaction et limportance dassurer laffectation du talent entrepreneurial en direction des ressources economiques.This paper considers competition between governance arrangements for firms. It is argued that a variety of constitutional structures can be observed in the market and that historically this variety has served important transactional purposes. The Coasian and Austrian approaches to the explanation of governance arrangements are contrasted. Recent trends towards investor ownership of firms and away from co-operative and mutual arrangements are considered. It is argued that government regulatory intervention may be an important explanation for recent trends in the UK, especially in the area of financial institutions. Suggestions that stakeholder models of firm governance should be introduced through state intervention ignore considerations both of transactions costs and the importance of ensuring the allocation of entrepreneurial talent to the direction of economic resources.
期刊介绍:
The Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines (JEEH) is a journal of political economy and interdisciplinary economic studies. It addresses economic issues in political theory, social dynamics, social science methodology, and philosophy. Today, JEEH has an international audience, and welcomes contributions written by scholars from around the world. JEEH''s goals are: -To bring together economics with neighboring disciplines such as law, history, political science, sociology, philosophy, psychology, and anthropology -To promote the development of the Austrian approach to economics (Austrian School) and to provide discussion and controversy -To reconcile economics with the ethical and policy-oriented principles which make coordinated interaction between human beings possible