使用高性能计算进行生物医学建模的实际挑战

D. Wright, R. Richardson, P. Coveney
{"title":"使用高性能计算进行生物医学建模的实际挑战","authors":"D. Wright, R. Richardson, P. Coveney","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27299v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept underlying precision medicine is that prevention, diagnosis and treatment of pathologies such as cancer can be improved through an understanding of the influence of individual patient characteristics. Predictive medicine seeks to derive this understanding through mechanistic models of the causes and (potential) progression of diseases within a given individual. This represents a grand challenge for computational biomedicine as it requires the integration of highly varied (and potentially vast) quantitative experimental datasets into models of complex biological systems. It is becoming increasingly clear that this challenge can only be answered through the use of complex workflows that combine diverse analyses and whose design is informed by an understanding of how predictions must be accompanied by estimates of uncertainty. Each stage in such a workflow can, in general, have very different computational requirements. If funding bodies and the HPC community are serious about the desire to support such approaches, they must consider the need for portable, persistent and stable tools designed to promote extensive long term development and testing of these workflows. From the perspective of model developers (and with even greater relevance to potential clinical or experimental collaborators) the enormous diversity of interfaces and supercomputer policies, frequently designed with monolithic applications in mind, can represent a serious barrier to innovation. Here we use experiences from work on two very different biomedical modeling scenarios - brain bloodflow and small molecule drug selection - to highlight issues with the current programming and execution environments and suggest potential solutions.","PeriodicalId":93040,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ preprints","volume":"23 1","pages":"e27299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical challenges for biomedical modeling using HPC\",\"authors\":\"D. Wright, R. Richardson, P. Coveney\",\"doi\":\"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27299v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept underlying precision medicine is that prevention, diagnosis and treatment of pathologies such as cancer can be improved through an understanding of the influence of individual patient characteristics. Predictive medicine seeks to derive this understanding through mechanistic models of the causes and (potential) progression of diseases within a given individual. This represents a grand challenge for computational biomedicine as it requires the integration of highly varied (and potentially vast) quantitative experimental datasets into models of complex biological systems. It is becoming increasingly clear that this challenge can only be answered through the use of complex workflows that combine diverse analyses and whose design is informed by an understanding of how predictions must be accompanied by estimates of uncertainty. Each stage in such a workflow can, in general, have very different computational requirements. If funding bodies and the HPC community are serious about the desire to support such approaches, they must consider the need for portable, persistent and stable tools designed to promote extensive long term development and testing of these workflows. From the perspective of model developers (and with even greater relevance to potential clinical or experimental collaborators) the enormous diversity of interfaces and supercomputer policies, frequently designed with monolithic applications in mind, can represent a serious barrier to innovation. Here we use experiences from work on two very different biomedical modeling scenarios - brain bloodflow and small molecule drug selection - to highlight issues with the current programming and execution environments and suggest potential solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ preprints\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"e27299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ preprints\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27299v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ preprints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27299v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精准医学的基本概念是,通过了解患者个体特征的影响,可以改善癌症等疾病的预防、诊断和治疗。预测医学试图通过对特定个体的病因和(潜在)疾病进展的机制模型来获得这种理解。这对计算生物医学来说是一个巨大的挑战,因为它需要将高度多样化(潜在巨大的)定量实验数据集整合到复杂生物系统的模型中。越来越清楚的是,这个挑战只能通过使用复杂的工作流来回答,这些工作流结合了不同的分析,并且其设计是通过理解预测必须如何伴随着不确定性的估计来告知的。通常,这种工作流中的每个阶段都有非常不同的计算需求。如果资助机构和高性能计算社区对支持这些方法的愿望是认真的,他们必须考虑对便携式、持久和稳定的工具的需求,这些工具旨在促进这些工作流的广泛长期开发和测试。从模型开发人员的角度来看(并且与潜在的临床或实验合作者有更大的相关性),接口和超级计算机策略的巨大多样性,通常以单片应用程序设计,可能代表创新的严重障碍。在这里,我们利用两种截然不同的生物医学建模场景(脑血流和小分子药物选择)的工作经验来强调当前编程和执行环境中的问题,并提出潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practical challenges for biomedical modeling using HPC
The concept underlying precision medicine is that prevention, diagnosis and treatment of pathologies such as cancer can be improved through an understanding of the influence of individual patient characteristics. Predictive medicine seeks to derive this understanding through mechanistic models of the causes and (potential) progression of diseases within a given individual. This represents a grand challenge for computational biomedicine as it requires the integration of highly varied (and potentially vast) quantitative experimental datasets into models of complex biological systems. It is becoming increasingly clear that this challenge can only be answered through the use of complex workflows that combine diverse analyses and whose design is informed by an understanding of how predictions must be accompanied by estimates of uncertainty. Each stage in such a workflow can, in general, have very different computational requirements. If funding bodies and the HPC community are serious about the desire to support such approaches, they must consider the need for portable, persistent and stable tools designed to promote extensive long term development and testing of these workflows. From the perspective of model developers (and with even greater relevance to potential clinical or experimental collaborators) the enormous diversity of interfaces and supercomputer policies, frequently designed with monolithic applications in mind, can represent a serious barrier to innovation. Here we use experiences from work on two very different biomedical modeling scenarios - brain bloodflow and small molecule drug selection - to highlight issues with the current programming and execution environments and suggest potential solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A framework for designing compassionate and ethical artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness Time series event correlation with DTW and Hierarchical Clustering methods Securing ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol against the black hole DoS attack in MANETs 12 Grand Challenges in Single-Cell Data Science Mice tracking using the YOLO algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1