开发仪器来报告和评估与草药相关的不良事件的因果关系

P. Mastroianni, F. Varallo, M. A. Costa, L. V. Sacramento
{"title":"开发仪器来报告和评估与草药相关的不良事件的因果关系","authors":"P. Mastroianni, F. Varallo, M. A. Costa, L. V. Sacramento","doi":"10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V24N1A02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of herbal medicines is justified empirically using ethnopharmacological knowledge, which has limitations. Reports of adverse events (AE) may contribute for safety, quality, and effectiveness assessment. Objectives: This study aimed to develop an instrument to allow detection and evaluation of the causal likelihood of AE related to herbal medicines. Methods: A quantitative methodological development research intervention was performed with primary care health professionals. Two cases were distributed in an interval of one week in order to allow for completion of the proposal form. The within-rater reliability was calculated and classified into satisfactory, regular, and unsatisfactory, according to essential, necessary, and recommended items reported. Results: Fifty-seven professionals were enrolled. A high degree of the within-rater reliability was observed for the most essential, necessary, and recommended fields. The instrument contributed to assessment of definite causal association, once the duration of reactions including evolution, withdrawal, and reposition items showed high reliability. Most fields poor and weak filled were related to quality defects, such as popular name and appearance. Conclusions: Data suggest the instrument is adequate to report AE arising from herbal medicines. Owing to information regarding to organoleptic characteristics, the instrument is different from drug instruments. Therefore, it is intended to improve AE reports related to herbal medicines and contribute for appropriate use.","PeriodicalId":23515,"journal":{"name":"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica","volume":"24 1","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT TO REPORT AND ASSESS CAUSALITY OF ADVERSE EVENTS RELATED TO HERBAL MEDICINES\",\"authors\":\"P. Mastroianni, F. Varallo, M. A. Costa, L. V. Sacramento\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V24N1A02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The use of herbal medicines is justified empirically using ethnopharmacological knowledge, which has limitations. Reports of adverse events (AE) may contribute for safety, quality, and effectiveness assessment. Objectives: This study aimed to develop an instrument to allow detection and evaluation of the causal likelihood of AE related to herbal medicines. Methods: A quantitative methodological development research intervention was performed with primary care health professionals. Two cases were distributed in an interval of one week in order to allow for completion of the proposal form. The within-rater reliability was calculated and classified into satisfactory, regular, and unsatisfactory, according to essential, necessary, and recommended items reported. Results: Fifty-seven professionals were enrolled. A high degree of the within-rater reliability was observed for the most essential, necessary, and recommended fields. The instrument contributed to assessment of definite causal association, once the duration of reactions including evolution, withdrawal, and reposition items showed high reliability. Most fields poor and weak filled were related to quality defects, such as popular name and appearance. Conclusions: Data suggest the instrument is adequate to report AE arising from herbal medicines. Owing to information regarding to organoleptic characteristics, the instrument is different from drug instruments. Therefore, it is intended to improve AE reports related to herbal medicines and contribute for appropriate use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"13-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V24N1A02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitae-revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/UDEA.VITAE.V24N1A02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:草药的使用是合理的经验使用民族药理学知识,这是有局限性的。不良事件(AE)的报告有助于安全性、质量和有效性评估。目的:本研究旨在开发一种仪器,用于检测和评估与中草药相关的AE的因果可能性。方法:对初级保健卫生专业人员进行定量方法学发展研究干预。两个案例在一周的间隔内分发,以便完成提案表格。根据报告的基本、必要和推荐项目,计算了量表内信度,并将其分为满意、正常和不满意。结果:57名专业人员入组。对于最基本的、必要的和推荐的字段,观察到高度的内部可靠性。该工具有助于评估明确的因果关系,一旦反应的持续时间,包括进化,退出,和重新定位项目显示高可靠性。大多田间补差和补弱与质量缺陷有关,如人名和外观。结论:数据表明该仪器足以报告中草药引起的AE。由于有关感官特征的信息,该仪器不同于药物仪器。因此,本研究旨在完善中草药AE报告,为中草药的合理使用做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT TO REPORT AND ASSESS CAUSALITY OF ADVERSE EVENTS RELATED TO HERBAL MEDICINES
Background: The use of herbal medicines is justified empirically using ethnopharmacological knowledge, which has limitations. Reports of adverse events (AE) may contribute for safety, quality, and effectiveness assessment. Objectives: This study aimed to develop an instrument to allow detection and evaluation of the causal likelihood of AE related to herbal medicines. Methods: A quantitative methodological development research intervention was performed with primary care health professionals. Two cases were distributed in an interval of one week in order to allow for completion of the proposal form. The within-rater reliability was calculated and classified into satisfactory, regular, and unsatisfactory, according to essential, necessary, and recommended items reported. Results: Fifty-seven professionals were enrolled. A high degree of the within-rater reliability was observed for the most essential, necessary, and recommended fields. The instrument contributed to assessment of definite causal association, once the duration of reactions including evolution, withdrawal, and reposition items showed high reliability. Most fields poor and weak filled were related to quality defects, such as popular name and appearance. Conclusions: Data suggest the instrument is adequate to report AE arising from herbal medicines. Owing to information regarding to organoleptic characteristics, the instrument is different from drug instruments. Therefore, it is intended to improve AE reports related to herbal medicines and contribute for appropriate use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VASCULAR MECHANISMS OF TRITERPENOID SAPONINS ISOLATED FROM Passiflora quadrangularis L. PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ÑUÑA (Andean popping) BEAN PROTEIN EXTRACT ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF A SYNTHETIC BACTERIOCIN FOUND IN THE GENOME OF LACTOBACILLUS CASEI ON THE MICROBIOTA OF ANTIOQUIAN SOFT CHEESE (QUESITO ANTIOQUEÑO) PRODUCTION OF VINEGAR FROM AN ALCOHOLIC 1 BEVERAGE OF 2 ANDEAN BERRY (Vaccinium meridionale SW), MEASUREMENT OF 3 ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND EVALUATION OF CYTOTOXIC EFFECT ON 4 COLON CANCER CELLS SW480 TOXINOLOGY IN COLOMBIA: CONTRIBUTIONS OF PROGRAMA DE OFIDISMO/ESCORPIONISMO AND OTHER RESEARCH GROUPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1