P-O15“刀到皮肤”的时间:不变的变量

M. Michel, H. Fifer, Emily Moran, C. Bonner, F. Hammett, M. Khawgali, M. Kronberga, Ala Saab, M. Balbola, A. Saha
{"title":"P-O15“刀到皮肤”的时间:不变的变量","authors":"M. Michel, H. Fifer, Emily Moran, C. Bonner, F. Hammett, M. Khawgali, M. Kronberga, Ala Saab, M. Balbola, A. Saha","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znab430.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The Covid-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of healthcare globally. Theatre utilisation assumes a substantial proportion of hospital resources, creating a streamlined pathway increases efficiency and productivity. With concerns regarding aerosol generating procedures, viral transmission to health care workers in theatre and patient pathways through the hospitals the covid-19 pandemic has added another dimension to the theatre pathway. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of Covid-19 on the “knife to skin” (KTS) time and compare it to previous historical data (HD). Methods Retrospective analysis of real time theatre data was analysed for the first 12 months of the pandemic from 11th March 2020 to 11th March 2021. To try and minimise variability between different specialities and operations we picked one operation to study: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Historical data was also gathered from the same time frame over the last 5 years (2015-2020) for comparison. Data collected included emergency or elective, time sent for patient, anaesthetic start time, knife to skin time and duration of operation. Comparison of means were analysed by One-way ANOVA tests and Student’s T-Test. Results 399 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the first year of the pandemic. KTS time was calculated as operation start time minus time sent for patient. Average time during the pandemic for emergency LC KTS was 56 minutes and 35 minutes for elective LC. Comparison of these times to HD revealed no statistical difference (Emergency LC 56 mins vs 58 mins p > 0.05, Elective LC 35 mins vs 35 mins p > 0.05). The anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic vs HD was 10 mins vs 14 mins (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found in the elective group, 16mins vs 14mins (p > 0.05) Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has had no detectable effect on Knife to skin time as compared to our previous historical data. It seems the extra Covid 19 precautions involving PPE, pathways etc. have not affected theatre efficiency or utilisation. In fact, there was very little variance in KTS time over the six years studied (2015-2021) with very consistent levels for both elective and emergency procedures. The shorter anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic needs to be further investigated but one hypothesis is the unconscious or conscious decision to decrease the amount of preoxygenation to minimise aerosolisation.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-O15 “Knife to Skin” time: The invariable variable\",\"authors\":\"M. Michel, H. Fifer, Emily Moran, C. Bonner, F. Hammett, M. Khawgali, M. Kronberga, Ala Saab, M. Balbola, A. Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znab430.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background The Covid-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of healthcare globally. Theatre utilisation assumes a substantial proportion of hospital resources, creating a streamlined pathway increases efficiency and productivity. With concerns regarding aerosol generating procedures, viral transmission to health care workers in theatre and patient pathways through the hospitals the covid-19 pandemic has added another dimension to the theatre pathway. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of Covid-19 on the “knife to skin” (KTS) time and compare it to previous historical data (HD). Methods Retrospective analysis of real time theatre data was analysed for the first 12 months of the pandemic from 11th March 2020 to 11th March 2021. To try and minimise variability between different specialities and operations we picked one operation to study: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Historical data was also gathered from the same time frame over the last 5 years (2015-2020) for comparison. Data collected included emergency or elective, time sent for patient, anaesthetic start time, knife to skin time and duration of operation. Comparison of means were analysed by One-way ANOVA tests and Student’s T-Test. Results 399 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the first year of the pandemic. KTS time was calculated as operation start time minus time sent for patient. Average time during the pandemic for emergency LC KTS was 56 minutes and 35 minutes for elective LC. Comparison of these times to HD revealed no statistical difference (Emergency LC 56 mins vs 58 mins p > 0.05, Elective LC 35 mins vs 35 mins p > 0.05). The anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic vs HD was 10 mins vs 14 mins (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found in the elective group, 16mins vs 14mins (p > 0.05) Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has had no detectable effect on Knife to skin time as compared to our previous historical data. It seems the extra Covid 19 precautions involving PPE, pathways etc. have not affected theatre efficiency or utilisation. In fact, there was very little variance in KTS time over the six years studied (2015-2021) with very consistent levels for both elective and emergency procedures. The shorter anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic needs to be further investigated but one hypothesis is the unconscious or conscious decision to decrease the amount of preoxygenation to minimise aerosolisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景2019冠状病毒病大流行影响了全球医疗保健的各个方面。手术室的使用占据了医院资源的很大一部分,创造了一个流线型的途径,提高了效率和生产力。由于对气溶胶产生程序的担忧,病毒在手术室向医护人员传播以及通过医院的患者途径传播,covid-19大流行为手术室途径增加了另一个维度。本研究的目的是量化新冠肺炎对“从刀到皮肤”(KTS)时间的影响,并将其与以往的历史数据(HD)进行比较。方法回顾性分析大流行前12个月(2020年3月11日至2021年3月11日)的实时手术室数据。为了尽量减少不同专科和手术之间的差异,我们选择了一种手术来研究:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。还收集了过去5年(2015-2020年)同一时间段的历史数据进行比较。收集的数据包括急诊或择期、送病人时间、麻醉开始时间、刀到皮肤时间和手术时间。均数比较采用单因素方差分析和学生t检验。结果大流行第一年共施行腹腔镜胆囊切除术399例。KTS时间计算为手术开始时间减去送病人时间。大流行期间,紧急LC - KTS的平均时间为56分钟,选择性LC - ts的平均时间为35分钟。将这些时间与HD进行比较没有统计学差异(紧急LC 56分钟vs 58分钟p > 0.05,选择性LC 35分钟vs 35分钟p > 0.05)。大流行期间紧急LC麻醉时间为10分钟,HD为14分钟(p < 0.05)。结论与我们之前的历史数据相比,Covid-19大流行对刀到皮肤时间没有可检测到的影响。似乎涉及个人防护装备、通道等额外的Covid - 19预防措施并未影响手术室的效率或利用率。事实上,在研究的六年(2015-2021年)中,KTS时间的变化很小,选择性和紧急手术的水平非常一致。需要进一步调查大流行期间紧急LC的较短麻醉时间,但一种假设是无意识或有意识地决定减少预充氧量以尽量减少雾化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P-O15 “Knife to Skin” time: The invariable variable
Abstract Background The Covid-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of healthcare globally. Theatre utilisation assumes a substantial proportion of hospital resources, creating a streamlined pathway increases efficiency and productivity. With concerns regarding aerosol generating procedures, viral transmission to health care workers in theatre and patient pathways through the hospitals the covid-19 pandemic has added another dimension to the theatre pathway. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of Covid-19 on the “knife to skin” (KTS) time and compare it to previous historical data (HD). Methods Retrospective analysis of real time theatre data was analysed for the first 12 months of the pandemic from 11th March 2020 to 11th March 2021. To try and minimise variability between different specialities and operations we picked one operation to study: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Historical data was also gathered from the same time frame over the last 5 years (2015-2020) for comparison. Data collected included emergency or elective, time sent for patient, anaesthetic start time, knife to skin time and duration of operation. Comparison of means were analysed by One-way ANOVA tests and Student’s T-Test. Results 399 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed during the first year of the pandemic. KTS time was calculated as operation start time minus time sent for patient. Average time during the pandemic for emergency LC KTS was 56 minutes and 35 minutes for elective LC. Comparison of these times to HD revealed no statistical difference (Emergency LC 56 mins vs 58 mins p > 0.05, Elective LC 35 mins vs 35 mins p > 0.05). The anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic vs HD was 10 mins vs 14 mins (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was found in the elective group, 16mins vs 14mins (p > 0.05) Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has had no detectable effect on Knife to skin time as compared to our previous historical data. It seems the extra Covid 19 precautions involving PPE, pathways etc. have not affected theatre efficiency or utilisation. In fact, there was very little variance in KTS time over the six years studied (2015-2021) with very consistent levels for both elective and emergency procedures. The shorter anaesthetic time for emergency LC during the pandemic needs to be further investigated but one hypothesis is the unconscious or conscious decision to decrease the amount of preoxygenation to minimise aerosolisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OC-022 MAINTAINING AN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION SERVICE DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC P-041 THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE P-027 REDUCING SURGICAL WAIT TIMES FOR ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA OPERATIONS POST COVID-19 BY USING DEDICATED CLINICS OC-045 AMBULATORY HERNIA SURGERY IN PRIMARY CARE V-023 R-TAPP AS A TRAINING MODEL IN ROBOTIC SURGERY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1