“为什么所有的好曲子都要给魔鬼?”《食品监管、捕获和合法性评论》

M. Caraher
{"title":"“为什么所有的好曲子都要给魔鬼?”《食品监管、捕获和合法性评论》","authors":"M. Caraher","doi":"10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a commentary on how food corporations expand their legitimacy by tactics which are rooted in undermining public health and nutrition policies. The move from public sector policy making to models which involve the food industry are set out along with some of the background rationale for such moves. This article picks up four developments driven and influenced by the private food sector and expands on them, these are: 1) the selective choice and reframing of evidence for food policy change; 2) the poor narrative framing by public health of the ‘story’; 3) the demands emerging from government and research councils for private sector involvement and 4) the lack of clear ethical principles on engagement with the food industry. Discussion of these four aspects is accompanied by some suggestions for future research into policy making.","PeriodicalId":15858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Why Should The Devil Have All The Good Tunes?’ A Commentary on Food Regulation, Capture and Legitimacy\",\"authors\":\"M. Caraher\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a commentary on how food corporations expand their legitimacy by tactics which are rooted in undermining public health and nutrition policies. The move from public sector policy making to models which involve the food industry are set out along with some of the background rationale for such moves. This article picks up four developments driven and influenced by the private food sector and expands on them, these are: 1) the selective choice and reframing of evidence for food policy change; 2) the poor narrative framing by public health of the ‘story’; 3) the demands emerging from government and research councils for private sector involvement and 4) the lack of clear ethical principles on engagement with the food industry. Discussion of these four aspects is accompanied by some suggestions for future research into policy making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对食品公司如何通过植根于破坏公共健康和营养政策的策略来扩大其合法性的评论。从公共部门政策制定到涉及食品工业的模式的转变,以及这种转变的一些背景理由。本文选取了由私营粮食部门推动和影响的四个发展,并对其进行了扩展,它们是:1)粮食政策变化证据的选择性选择和重新构建;2)公共卫生对“故事”的叙述框架不佳;3)政府和研究委员会对私营部门参与的要求;4)与食品行业接触缺乏明确的道德原则。对这四个方面进行了探讨,并对今后的政策制定研究提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Why Should The Devil Have All The Good Tunes?’ A Commentary on Food Regulation, Capture and Legitimacy
This article is a commentary on how food corporations expand their legitimacy by tactics which are rooted in undermining public health and nutrition policies. The move from public sector policy making to models which involve the food industry are set out along with some of the background rationale for such moves. This article picks up four developments driven and influenced by the private food sector and expands on them, these are: 1) the selective choice and reframing of evidence for food policy change; 2) the poor narrative framing by public health of the ‘story’; 3) the demands emerging from government and research councils for private sector involvement and 4) the lack of clear ethical principles on engagement with the food industry. Discussion of these four aspects is accompanied by some suggestions for future research into policy making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Carbohydrate vs High Fat Diets: Which is Preferable for Long-term Use? Macronutrient Adequacy of a Mediterranean-type Meal Examined at Recommended and Below Recommended Energy Values. Potential Benefits of Supplementation with Lecithin-Based Delivery Form of Boswellia serrata Extract and CoQ10 on Amateur Athletes for the Recovery of Acute Traumas or Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Single-Arm Pilot study Skin Improvement Effects of Phytosterol Ester Derived from Rice Bran Focus on Dietary Pattern: Would this be the Answer to the Rising Prevalence of Autoimmune Diseases? Results of a Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1