李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin
{"title":"不同标准x射线RQR辐射场标定TLD的眼透镜剂量Hp研究(3)","authors":"李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP). \n \n \nMethods \nUsing a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response. \n \n \nResults \nIn terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3). \n \n \nKey words: \nEye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp(3)\",\"authors\":\"李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nUsing a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nIn terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3). \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nEye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"42-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较SSDL(NIRP)与CEA LIST LNHB(法国)标准x射线RQR辐射场标定结果,探讨在SSDL(NIRP)标准x射线RQR辐射场标定Hp(3)的可行性。方法采用直径和高度为20 cm的柱模型,在SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB(法国)中校准TLD,测量个人剂量等效眼透镜剂量Hp(3), x射线RQR辐射场包括RQR4(60 kV)、RQR7(90 kV)、RQR9(120 kV),具有能量响应、角度响应和线性响应。结果在能量响应方面,SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB (France)的TLD校准结果一致。暴露值与反应值的差异小于10%。角度响应方面,CEA LIST LNHB (France)的TLD校准结果优于SSDL(NIRP)。CEA LIST LNHB(法国)的暴露值与响应值的差异小于6%,而SSDL(NIRP)在20°角处的暴露值与响应值的差异大于10%。在线性响应方面,SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB (France)的校准结果基本一致。结论SSDL (NIRP)的标准x线RQR场可用于Hp(3)的标定。关键词:眼球晶状体;RQR领域;惠普(3);热释光的放射量测定器(TLD)
Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp(3)
Objective
To compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP).
Methods
Using a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response.
Results
In terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement.
Conclusions
The standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3).
Key words:
Eye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)