不同标准x射线RQR辐射场标定TLD的眼透镜剂量Hp研究(3)

李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin
{"title":"不同标准x射线RQR辐射场标定TLD的眼透镜剂量Hp研究(3)","authors":"李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP). \n \n \nMethods \nUsing a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response. \n \n \nResults \nIn terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3). \n \n \nKey words: \nEye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp(3)\",\"authors\":\"李文炎, Liu Wenyan, 张贵英, Zhang Guiying, 王志超, Wang Zhichao, 郭泽钦, Guo Ze-qin, 康梦霄, Kang Mengxiao, 刘传业, Liu Chuanye, 盛文涛, Shen Wentao, 曾粤, Zeng Yue, 罗希, L. Xi, 岳琳琳, Yue Linlin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nUsing a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nIn terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3). \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nEye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"42-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较SSDL(NIRP)与CEA LIST LNHB(法国)标准x射线RQR辐射场标定结果,探讨在SSDL(NIRP)标准x射线RQR辐射场标定Hp(3)的可行性。方法采用直径和高度为20 cm的柱模型,在SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB(法国)中校准TLD,测量个人剂量等效眼透镜剂量Hp(3), x射线RQR辐射场包括RQR4(60 kV)、RQR7(90 kV)、RQR9(120 kV),具有能量响应、角度响应和线性响应。结果在能量响应方面,SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB (France)的TLD校准结果一致。暴露值与反应值的差异小于10%。角度响应方面,CEA LIST LNHB (France)的TLD校准结果优于SSDL(NIRP)。CEA LIST LNHB(法国)的暴露值与响应值的差异小于6%,而SSDL(NIRP)在20°角处的暴露值与响应值的差异大于10%。在线性响应方面,SSDL (NIRP)和CEA LIST LNHB (France)的校准结果基本一致。结论SSDL (NIRP)的标准x线RQR场可用于Hp(3)的标定。关键词:眼球晶状体;RQR领域;惠普(3);热释光的放射量测定器(TLD)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp(3)
Objective To compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP). Methods Using a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response. Results In terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. Conclusions The standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3). Key words: Eye lens; RQR field; Hp(3); Thermoluminescent dosimeter(TLD)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Infection control status of novel coronavirus pneumonia and radiation safety at CT workplace Current status of the application of radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy resources in Huai'an City in 2020 The application value of low-dose CT scan in pregnant women with COVID-19 Eeffects of tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose of paranasal sinus CT examination Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1