评论文章:多模态、电影和电影隐喻:对m ller和Kappelhoff(2018)的评价

Q3 Arts and Humanities Punctum International Journal of Semiotics Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.18680/hss.2018.0021
C. Forceville
{"title":"评论文章:多模态、电影和电影隐喻:对m<s:1> ller和Kappelhoff(2018)的评价","authors":"C. Forceville","doi":"10.18680/hss.2018.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muller and Kappelhoff’s Cinematic Metaphor: Experience – Affectivity – Temporality (2018) is the fruit of a collaboration in the Languages and Emotion project, further developed in the Cinepoetics Center for Advanced Film Studies, both based at Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany. It proposes a new framework for analyzing metaphor in film that is based on dissatisfaction with (1) Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory; (2) cognitivist-oriented applications and adaptations of this theory in the field of multimodality, specifically as operating in film (e.g., Forceville and Urios-Aparisi 2009; Forceville 2006, 2016, 2017; Rohdin 2009; Fahlenbrach 2010, 2016; Coegnarts and Kravanja 2012, 2015; Ortiz 2011, 2015); and (3) cognitive film scholarship (e.g., Bordwell 1985, 2013; Smith 1995; Plantinga 2009, 2013; Grodal 2009). Given the status of the authors of this monograph, its serious criticism of the aforementioned theories and approaches deserves an equally serious response. This paper can be considered as an extended review of Cinematic Metaphor.","PeriodicalId":36248,"journal":{"name":"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review Article: Multimodality, film, and cinematic metaphor: an evaluation of Müller and Kappelhoff (2018)\",\"authors\":\"C. Forceville\",\"doi\":\"10.18680/hss.2018.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Muller and Kappelhoff’s Cinematic Metaphor: Experience – Affectivity – Temporality (2018) is the fruit of a collaboration in the Languages and Emotion project, further developed in the Cinepoetics Center for Advanced Film Studies, both based at Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany. It proposes a new framework for analyzing metaphor in film that is based on dissatisfaction with (1) Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory; (2) cognitivist-oriented applications and adaptations of this theory in the field of multimodality, specifically as operating in film (e.g., Forceville and Urios-Aparisi 2009; Forceville 2006, 2016, 2017; Rohdin 2009; Fahlenbrach 2010, 2016; Coegnarts and Kravanja 2012, 2015; Ortiz 2011, 2015); and (3) cognitive film scholarship (e.g., Bordwell 1985, 2013; Smith 1995; Plantinga 2009, 2013; Grodal 2009). Given the status of the authors of this monograph, its serious criticism of the aforementioned theories and approaches deserves an equally serious response. This paper can be considered as an extended review of Cinematic Metaphor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2018.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punctum International Journal of Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2018.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Muller和Kappelhoff的电影隐喻:经验-情感-时间性(2018)是语言和情感项目合作的成果,在德国柏林自由大学的高级电影研究电影学中心进一步发展。本文基于对Lakoff和Johnson(1980)概念隐喻理论的不满,提出了一个分析电影隐喻的新框架;(2)以认知主义为导向的理论在多模态领域的应用和改编,特别是在电影中的应用(例如,《force eville》和Urios-Aparisi 2009;《force eville》2006、2016、2017;Rohdin 2009;Fahlenbrach 2010, 2016;Coegnarts and Kravanja 2012, 2015;Ortiz 2011, 2015);(3)认知电影奖学金(例如,Bordwell 1985, 2013;史密斯1995年;Plantinga 2009, 2013;Grodal 2009)。鉴于这本专著作者的地位,它对上述理论和方法的严肃批评应该得到同样严肃的回应。本文可以看作是对电影隐喻的延伸回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review Article: Multimodality, film, and cinematic metaphor: an evaluation of Müller and Kappelhoff (2018)
Muller and Kappelhoff’s Cinematic Metaphor: Experience – Affectivity – Temporality (2018) is the fruit of a collaboration in the Languages and Emotion project, further developed in the Cinepoetics Center for Advanced Film Studies, both based at Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany. It proposes a new framework for analyzing metaphor in film that is based on dissatisfaction with (1) Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory; (2) cognitivist-oriented applications and adaptations of this theory in the field of multimodality, specifically as operating in film (e.g., Forceville and Urios-Aparisi 2009; Forceville 2006, 2016, 2017; Rohdin 2009; Fahlenbrach 2010, 2016; Coegnarts and Kravanja 2012, 2015; Ortiz 2011, 2015); and (3) cognitive film scholarship (e.g., Bordwell 1985, 2013; Smith 1995; Plantinga 2009, 2013; Grodal 2009). Given the status of the authors of this monograph, its serious criticism of the aforementioned theories and approaches deserves an equally serious response. This paper can be considered as an extended review of Cinematic Metaphor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Punctum International Journal of Semiotics
Punctum International Journal of Semiotics Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concept formation and the text in digital culture An introduction to semiotics? Beyond immediacy and transparency. A semiotic approach to discursive and rhetorical strategies in media visualization and data visualization The “modulation mania”. Impersonal enunciation and visual rhetoric of the data image A Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis of identification documents in the Greek asylum context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1