粮食农用多种农药和水源混合罐中喷雾糖浆的物理化学性质

Fernando Burin, Cristiano Márcio Alves de Souza, I. Ramires, P. V. da Silva
{"title":"粮食农用多种农药和水源混合罐中喷雾糖浆的物理化学性质","authors":"Fernando Burin, Cristiano Márcio Alves de Souza, I. Ramires, P. V. da Silva","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis work evaluated physical-chemical properties of spraying syrup formulated with different water types and using or not tank-mixing pesticides. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 4 x 5 factorial scheme (4 water types and 4 pesticide syrups + control, non-sprayed plant) in three sampling times (off-season corn, pre-planting soybean weed control, and soybean season) within one year. Water treatments consisted of deionized, well, river and weir water. Product mixing consisted of herbicide (Glyphosate 925 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + insecticide (Imidacloprid + beta-cyfluthrin 100+12.5 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + fungicide (Trifloxystrobin + Prothioconazole 70+60 g a.i. ha-1) and herbicide + insecticide + fungicide. Weir water presented the worst physical quality. Spraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide in various combinations decreased the effectiveness of the pesticide. When associating the three pesticides, less dissolution of the spray syrup and greater risk of syrup incompatibility leads to pesticide ineffectiveness.\nHighlights:\n\nThe water type used in tank-mixing multiple pesticides affects spraying syrup quality.\nWater with the worst physical quality decreases pesticide performance.\nLess dissolution and greater risk of fungicide ineffectiveness take place when three pesticides are associated.\nSpraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing pesticides increased in the successive cultivation of soybean/corn.\n","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical-chemical properties of spray syrup in tank-mixing multiple pesticides and water sources used in grain farming\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Burin, Cristiano Márcio Alves de Souza, I. Ramires, P. V. da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.48162/rev.39.072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis work evaluated physical-chemical properties of spraying syrup formulated with different water types and using or not tank-mixing pesticides. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 4 x 5 factorial scheme (4 water types and 4 pesticide syrups + control, non-sprayed plant) in three sampling times (off-season corn, pre-planting soybean weed control, and soybean season) within one year. Water treatments consisted of deionized, well, river and weir water. Product mixing consisted of herbicide (Glyphosate 925 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + insecticide (Imidacloprid + beta-cyfluthrin 100+12.5 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + fungicide (Trifloxystrobin + Prothioconazole 70+60 g a.i. ha-1) and herbicide + insecticide + fungicide. Weir water presented the worst physical quality. Spraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide in various combinations decreased the effectiveness of the pesticide. When associating the three pesticides, less dissolution of the spray syrup and greater risk of syrup incompatibility leads to pesticide ineffectiveness.\\nHighlights:\\n\\nThe water type used in tank-mixing multiple pesticides affects spraying syrup quality.\\nWater with the worst physical quality decreases pesticide performance.\\nLess dissolution and greater risk of fungicide ineffectiveness take place when three pesticides are associated.\\nSpraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing pesticides increased in the successive cultivation of soybean/corn.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评价了不同水型配制的喷雾糖浆的理化性质,以及是否使用罐式混合农药。试验设计采用4 × 5因子随机方案(4种水型和4种农药糖浆+对照、未喷施植株),在1年内3次取样(玉米淡季、大豆播种前杂草防治和大豆季节)。水处理包括去离子水、井水、河水和堰水。产品由除草剂(草甘膦925 g a.i. ha-1)、除草剂+杀虫剂(吡虫啉+高效氟氰菊酯100+12.5 g a.i. ha-1)、除草剂+杀菌剂(氟虫酯+原硫康唑70+60 g a.i. ha-1)和除草剂+杀虫剂+杀菌剂组成。堰水的物理质量最差。喷洒不同组合除草剂、杀虫剂和杀菌剂制成的糖浆降低了农药的有效性。当三种农药相关联时,喷雾糖浆的溶出度越低,糖浆不相容的风险越大,导致农药无效。亮点:罐内混合多种农药使用的水类型影响喷洒糖浆的质量。物理质量最差的水会降低农药性能。当三种农药同时使用时,溶出度更低,杀菌剂失效的风险更大。在大豆/玉米连作中,罐式混合农药制备的喷雾糖浆用量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical-chemical properties of spray syrup in tank-mixing multiple pesticides and water sources used in grain farming
This work evaluated physical-chemical properties of spraying syrup formulated with different water types and using or not tank-mixing pesticides. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 4 x 5 factorial scheme (4 water types and 4 pesticide syrups + control, non-sprayed plant) in three sampling times (off-season corn, pre-planting soybean weed control, and soybean season) within one year. Water treatments consisted of deionized, well, river and weir water. Product mixing consisted of herbicide (Glyphosate 925 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + insecticide (Imidacloprid + beta-cyfluthrin 100+12.5 g a.i. ha-1), herbicide + fungicide (Trifloxystrobin + Prothioconazole 70+60 g a.i. ha-1) and herbicide + insecticide + fungicide. Weir water presented the worst physical quality. Spraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide in various combinations decreased the effectiveness of the pesticide. When associating the three pesticides, less dissolution of the spray syrup and greater risk of syrup incompatibility leads to pesticide ineffectiveness. Highlights: The water type used in tank-mixing multiple pesticides affects spraying syrup quality. Water with the worst physical quality decreases pesticide performance. Less dissolution and greater risk of fungicide ineffectiveness take place when three pesticides are associated. Spraying syrup prepared with tank-mixing pesticides increased in the successive cultivation of soybean/corn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazard indicators in urban trees. Case studies on Platanus x hispanica Mill. ex Münchh and Morus alba L. in Mendoza city-Argentina Volunteer soybean (Glycine max) interference in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) crops: ethoxysulfuron and halosulfuron critical level of damage and selectivity Effect of yeast and mycorrhizae inoculation on tomato production under normal and water stress conditions Apple (Malus domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis) yield prediction after tree image analysis Efficacy of zinc lactate and Lactobacillus bulgaricus on nutrition and health of broiler chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1