英国脱欧和CDS在英国和欧洲的溢出效应

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Comparative Economics Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.25428/1824-2979/201901-105-124
Jamal Bouoiyour, Refk Selmi
{"title":"英国脱欧和CDS在英国和欧洲的溢出效应","authors":"Jamal Bouoiyour, Refk Selmi","doi":"10.25428/1824-2979/201901-105-124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the transmission process between markets is critical for risk management and economic policy. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, it identifies when UK and European (France, Germany, Italy and Spain) Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) exhibit explosivity with respect to their past behaviors. Second, it quantifies the dynamics of CDS volatility spillover effects surrounding the UK's EU membership referendum commonly known as \" Brexit \". Using a recursive identification algorithm and new spillover measures suggested by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), quite interesting results were drawn. We detect significant build-ups in CDS prices for all countries under study soon after the day relative to the announcement of Brexit. Besides, we show that the great uncertainty over Brexit generates significant volatility spillovers across the underlined CDS. In particular, we find that UK, Italy and Spain are the \" net volatility transmitters \" , while France and Germany seem the \" net volatility receivers \". Such information can help policy makers in undertaking decoupling policies to (1) insulate the economy from risk spillovers effects, (2) lighten the spread of the damage done by Brexit and (3) preserve the stability of financial system. To attenuate the risk transmission across CDS markets over Brexit, regulators can, for example, put forth preventive strategies by foregrounding the most influential volatility senders (UK, Italy and Spain).","PeriodicalId":43449,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"105-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brexit and CDS spillovers across UK and Europe\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Bouoiyour, Refk Selmi\",\"doi\":\"10.25428/1824-2979/201901-105-124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the transmission process between markets is critical for risk management and economic policy. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, it identifies when UK and European (France, Germany, Italy and Spain) Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) exhibit explosivity with respect to their past behaviors. Second, it quantifies the dynamics of CDS volatility spillover effects surrounding the UK's EU membership referendum commonly known as \\\" Brexit \\\". Using a recursive identification algorithm and new spillover measures suggested by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), quite interesting results were drawn. We detect significant build-ups in CDS prices for all countries under study soon after the day relative to the announcement of Brexit. Besides, we show that the great uncertainty over Brexit generates significant volatility spillovers across the underlined CDS. In particular, we find that UK, Italy and Spain are the \\\" net volatility transmitters \\\" , while France and Germany seem the \\\" net volatility receivers \\\". Such information can help policy makers in undertaking decoupling policies to (1) insulate the economy from risk spillovers effects, (2) lighten the spread of the damage done by Brexit and (3) preserve the stability of financial system. To attenuate the risk transmission across CDS markets over Brexit, regulators can, for example, put forth preventive strategies by foregrounding the most influential volatility senders (UK, Italy and Spain).\",\"PeriodicalId\":43449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"105-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201901-105-124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201901-105-124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

了解市场之间的传导过程对风险管理和经济政策至关重要。本文的目的是双重的。首先,它确定了英国和欧洲(法国、德国、意大利和西班牙)的信用违约掉期(cds)何时表现出其过去行为的爆炸性。其次,它量化了围绕英国退欧公投的CDS波动溢出效应的动态。利用Diebold和Yilmaz(2012)提出的递归识别算法和新的溢出度量,得出了非常有趣的结果。我们发现,在英国宣布脱欧后不久,所有被研究国家的CDS价格都出现了大幅上涨。此外,我们还表明,英国脱欧的巨大不确定性会在所有CDS中产生显著的波动性溢出效应。我们特别发现,英国、意大利和西班牙是“净波动发送者”,而法国和德国似乎是“净波动接收者”。这些信息可以帮助政策制定者实施脱钩政策,以:(1)使经济免受风险溢出效应的影响,(2)减轻英国脱欧造成的损害的蔓延,(3)保持金融体系的稳定。例如,为了减弱英国退欧引发的CDS市场风险传导,监管机构可以提出预防性策略,将最具影响力的波动产生国(英国、意大利和西班牙)纳入考虑范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brexit and CDS spillovers across UK and Europe
Understanding the transmission process between markets is critical for risk management and economic policy. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, it identifies when UK and European (France, Germany, Italy and Spain) Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) exhibit explosivity with respect to their past behaviors. Second, it quantifies the dynamics of CDS volatility spillover effects surrounding the UK's EU membership referendum commonly known as " Brexit ". Using a recursive identification algorithm and new spillover measures suggested by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), quite interesting results were drawn. We detect significant build-ups in CDS prices for all countries under study soon after the day relative to the announcement of Brexit. Besides, we show that the great uncertainty over Brexit generates significant volatility spillovers across the underlined CDS. In particular, we find that UK, Italy and Spain are the " net volatility transmitters " , while France and Germany seem the " net volatility receivers ". Such information can help policy makers in undertaking decoupling policies to (1) insulate the economy from risk spillovers effects, (2) lighten the spread of the damage done by Brexit and (3) preserve the stability of financial system. To attenuate the risk transmission across CDS markets over Brexit, regulators can, for example, put forth preventive strategies by foregrounding the most influential volatility senders (UK, Italy and Spain).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Comparative Economics
European Journal of Comparative Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Several years have elapsed since the beginning of transition in Eastern Europe, and the profession has learnt a lot about the importance of institutions in the economy and our deep need for additional research on their influence on the interaction of the units that play the economic game. The study of economies that do not fit the paradigm of the competitive market, a field of enquiry that used to belong to the sideline of scientific enquiry, has been joined by leading scientists in the field, who were inspired by the new knowledge gained through the processes of transition and intrigued bthe policy problems posed by transformation of bureaucratically run socialist economies into capitalist market economies. The same institutional and social understanding is equally relevant to questions of conomic development, to the elimination of cleavages between North and South, and to the solution of problems of globalization.
期刊最新文献
Oil price shocks, equity markets, and contagion effect in OECD countries Export-led growth or growth-led exports? Western Europe in the "golden age" Energy policy of fossil fuel–producing countries: does global energy transition matter? Economic integration and exchange rate arrangements in the post-soviet period : The Baltic states in comparative perspective Globalization, regulation and profitability of banks: a comparative analysis of Europe, United States, India and China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1