分析并运用MRP方法有效地确定原材料需求

A. P. Widodo, Safrida Sugi Lestari
{"title":"分析并运用MRP方法有效地确定原材料需求","authors":"A. P. Widodo, Safrida Sugi Lestari","doi":"10.30996/die.v13i2.7300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the effective and efficient lot sizing method for determining raw material requirements in implementing MRP. The research stages are through testing 3 lot sizing methods namely LFL, EOQ, and POQ. The initial stage of data processing is in the form of a MPS obtained from demand recap data and BOM which are components of the product as input. The next step is the MRP process, namely the netting process, the lotting process, the offsetting process, and the explosion process. This stage is in the form of a MRP matrix in tabular form. The next step is to enter the inventory cost calculation process for each method consisting of the storage cost of each component per period and the ordering cost per message. Calculations are carried out for each method to determine the amount of absorption of inventory costs from each method. The results show that the LFL method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.240,000,000, the EOQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.251,503,100 and the POQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.261,027,683. In this case, LFL has the lowest absorption of inventory costs, according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL","PeriodicalId":11384,"journal":{"name":"Die Medizinische","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF DETERMINING RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY BY APPLYING THE MRP METHOD\",\"authors\":\"A. P. Widodo, Safrida Sugi Lestari\",\"doi\":\"10.30996/die.v13i2.7300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to analyze the effective and efficient lot sizing method for determining raw material requirements in implementing MRP. The research stages are through testing 3 lot sizing methods namely LFL, EOQ, and POQ. The initial stage of data processing is in the form of a MPS obtained from demand recap data and BOM which are components of the product as input. The next step is the MRP process, namely the netting process, the lotting process, the offsetting process, and the explosion process. This stage is in the form of a MRP matrix in tabular form. The next step is to enter the inventory cost calculation process for each method consisting of the storage cost of each component per period and the ordering cost per message. Calculations are carried out for each method to determine the amount of absorption of inventory costs from each method. The results show that the LFL method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.240,000,000, the EOQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.251,503,100 and the POQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.261,027,683. In this case, LFL has the lowest absorption of inventory costs, according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL\",\"PeriodicalId\":11384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Medizinische\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Medizinische\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30996/die.v13i2.7300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Medizinische","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30996/die.v13i2.7300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析在实施MRP时确定原材料需求的有效和高效的批量方法。研究阶段是通过测试三种批量方法,即LFL, EOQ和POQ。数据处理的初始阶段是以MPS的形式,从需求重述数据和作为输入的产品组件的BOM中获得MPS。下一个步骤是MRP过程,即净值过程,抽签过程,抵消过程,和爆炸过程。这个阶段是以表格形式的MRP矩阵的形式。下一步是进入每种方法的库存成本计算过程,该过程由每个周期的每个组件的存储成本和每个消息的订购成本组成。对每种方法进行计算,以确定每种方法的库存成本吸收量。结果表明,LFL法吸收库存成本为240,000,000卢比,EOQ法吸收库存成本为251,503,100卢比,POQ法吸收库存成本为261,027,683卢比。在这种情况下,LFL对库存成本的吸收最低,根据公司的现状,不留下库存,对公司来说易于实施。研究结果表明,最有效、最高效的方法是根据公司的现状,不留下库存,对公司来说易于实施的LFL。研究结果表明,最有效、最高效的方法是根据公司的现状,不留下库存,对公司来说易于实施的LFL。研究结果表明,最有效和最有效的方法是LFL
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSIS OF DETERMINING RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY BY APPLYING THE MRP METHOD
This research aims to analyze the effective and efficient lot sizing method for determining raw material requirements in implementing MRP. The research stages are through testing 3 lot sizing methods namely LFL, EOQ, and POQ. The initial stage of data processing is in the form of a MPS obtained from demand recap data and BOM which are components of the product as input. The next step is the MRP process, namely the netting process, the lotting process, the offsetting process, and the explosion process. This stage is in the form of a MRP matrix in tabular form. The next step is to enter the inventory cost calculation process for each method consisting of the storage cost of each component per period and the ordering cost per message. Calculations are carried out for each method to determine the amount of absorption of inventory costs from each method. The results show that the LFL method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.240,000,000, the EOQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.251,503,100 and the POQ method absorbs inventory costs of Rp.261,027,683. In this case, LFL has the lowest absorption of inventory costs, according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL according to the current state of the company, does not leave inventory, and is easy to implement for the company. The study results concluded that the most effective and efficient method is LFL
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE INFLUENCE OF RISK TOLERANCE, FAMILY ENVIRONMENT, AND FREEDOM TO WORK ON STUDENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTEREST The Impact of Covid-19 on The Sectoral Economy in Indonesia MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY IN THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC ERA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS MARKETING STRATEGY OF FABRIC BATIK ENTERPRENEURS IN MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMEs) CENTRA BATIK THE IMPACT OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN IMPROVING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT UNIVERSIDADE DA PAZ-UNPAZ DILI-TIMOR LESTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1