美国长期护理中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)接触预防措施的有效性

D. Morgan, M. Zhan, Michihiko Goto, C. Franciscus, Bruce H. Alexander, M. Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. Roghmann, Lisa Pineles
{"title":"美国长期护理中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)接触预防措施的有效性","authors":"D. Morgan, M. Zhan, Michihiko Goto, C. Franciscus, Bruce H. Alexander, M. Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. Roghmann, Lisa Pineles","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciz1045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities (LTCF). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends Contact Precautions for prevention of MRSA within acute care facilities and are being used within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for LTCF in a modified fashion. The impact of Contact Precautions in long-term care is unknown.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTo evaluate if Contact Precautions decreased MRSA acquisition in LTCF compared to Standard Precautions we performed a retrospective effectiveness study (pre-post with concurrent controls) using data from the VA healthcare system from 1/1/2011 until 12/31/2015, two years before and after a 2013 policy recommending a more aggressive form of Contact Precautions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAcross 75,414 patient admissions from 74 long-term care facilities in the United States, the overall unadjusted rate of MRSA acquisition was 2.6/1000 patient days. Patients were no more likely to acquire MRSA if they were cared for using Standard Precautions vs. Contact Precautions in multivariable discrete-time survival analysis, controlling for patient demographics, risk factors, and year of admission (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-1.12, p=0.71).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMRSA acquisition and infections were not impacted by use of active surveillance and Contact Precautions in LTCF in the VA.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of Contact Precautions on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in long-term care across the United States.\",\"authors\":\"D. Morgan, M. Zhan, Michihiko Goto, C. Franciscus, Bruce H. Alexander, M. Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. Roghmann, Lisa Pineles\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciz1045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities (LTCF). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends Contact Precautions for prevention of MRSA within acute care facilities and are being used within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for LTCF in a modified fashion. The impact of Contact Precautions in long-term care is unknown.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nTo evaluate if Contact Precautions decreased MRSA acquisition in LTCF compared to Standard Precautions we performed a retrospective effectiveness study (pre-post with concurrent controls) using data from the VA healthcare system from 1/1/2011 until 12/31/2015, two years before and after a 2013 policy recommending a more aggressive form of Contact Precautions.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAcross 75,414 patient admissions from 74 long-term care facilities in the United States, the overall unadjusted rate of MRSA acquisition was 2.6/1000 patient days. Patients were no more likely to acquire MRSA if they were cared for using Standard Precautions vs. Contact Precautions in multivariable discrete-time survival analysis, controlling for patient demographics, risk factors, and year of admission (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-1.12, p=0.71).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nMRSA acquisition and infections were not impacted by use of active surveillance and Contact Precautions in LTCF in the VA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是长期护理机构(LTCF)中卫生保健相关感染的常见原因。疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)建议在急性护理设施内预防MRSA的接触预防措施,并在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)以修改的方式用于LTCF。接触预防措施对长期护理的影响尚不清楚。方法:为了评估与标准预防措施相比,接触预防措施是否减少了LTCF中MRSA的获得,我们进行了一项回顾性有效性研究(前后对照),使用VA医疗保健系统从2011年1月1日至2015年12月31日的数据,即2013年政策推荐更积极的接触预防措施的前后两年。结果在美国74家长期护理机构的75,414例入院患者中,MRSA获得的总体未调整率为2.6/1000患者日。在多变量离散时间生存分析中,在控制患者人口统计学、危险因素和入院年份(优势比(OR) 0.97, 95%可信区间(CI), 0.85-1.12, p=0.71)的情况下,如果患者采用标准预防措施与接触预防措施进行护理,则患者不太可能获得MRSA。结论主动监测和接触预防措施对VA长期感染人群smrsa的获得和感染没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of Contact Precautions on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in long-term care across the United States.
BACKGROUND Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities (LTCF). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends Contact Precautions for prevention of MRSA within acute care facilities and are being used within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for LTCF in a modified fashion. The impact of Contact Precautions in long-term care is unknown. METHODS To evaluate if Contact Precautions decreased MRSA acquisition in LTCF compared to Standard Precautions we performed a retrospective effectiveness study (pre-post with concurrent controls) using data from the VA healthcare system from 1/1/2011 until 12/31/2015, two years before and after a 2013 policy recommending a more aggressive form of Contact Precautions. RESULTS Across 75,414 patient admissions from 74 long-term care facilities in the United States, the overall unadjusted rate of MRSA acquisition was 2.6/1000 patient days. Patients were no more likely to acquire MRSA if they were cared for using Standard Precautions vs. Contact Precautions in multivariable discrete-time survival analysis, controlling for patient demographics, risk factors, and year of admission (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-1.12, p=0.71). CONCLUSIONS MRSA acquisition and infections were not impacted by use of active surveillance and Contact Precautions in LTCF in the VA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mass tuberculosis screening among the elderly: A population-based study in a well-confined rural county in eastern China. Timing and Predictors of Loss of Infectivity among Healthcare Workers with Primary and Recurrent COVID-19: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study No immunological interference or safety concerns when adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine is coadministered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults aged 50 years and older: A randomized trial Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia. Impact of Undernutrition on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in India: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1