Y. Al-Azzawi, Y. Al-Abboodi, Matthew Fasullo, A. Ridha, T. Naguib
{"title":"肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的发病率和死亡率","authors":"Y. Al-Azzawi, Y. Al-Abboodi, Matthew Fasullo, A. Ridha, T. Naguib","doi":"10.4172/2167-0889.1000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prevalence of coronary artery disease in cirrhotic population is estimated to be low and the risk \n of bleeding in those who had percutaneous catheterization interventions (PCI) is not well studied yet. Our aim in this \n study is to determine the morbidity and mortality risks in cirrhotic patient undergoing PCI. \nMethods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2010. \n The NIS is the largest publicly available inpatient health care database in the United States. It contains data from \n more than 7 million hospital stays each year. People with Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related \n admissions and a history of cirrhosis diagnosis were placed in the case group. Equivalent number of people with PCI \n related admissions and no history of cirrhosis were identified randomly and Case-Control (PCI with cirrhosis vs. PCI \n without cirrhosis) design is used. All genders, race was with age of 18-year-old and above was included. A binary \n multivariate Logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the probability difference adjusted odd ratio. IBM \n SPSS Statistics for Windows was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% and P value less \n than 0.05 were determined to define significance. \nResults: A total of 1218 of PCI related admissions were identified. 609 PCI related admissions with cirrhosis \n (Cases group) and equivalent number of 609 admissions with PCI and no cirrhosis (Control group) were randomly \n selected. 83.5% of the cohort represented by white race followed by Hispanic and African-American percentages of \n 10% and 6.5% respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 60 years, 54% represented by male race. The mean \n length of stay was 1.06 in the non-cirrhosis group compared to the 1.65 days in the cirrhosis group. Tables 1 and 2 (0.3%) out of 609 PCI related admission and no history of cirrhosis group had an Upper Gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) Vs. 11 (1.8%) in the PCI related admission with history of cirrhosis group. Inpatient mortality in the PCI+ non \n Cirrhosis group was 0.3% vs. 1.8% in the PCI and Cirrhosis group. \nThe probability of dying during hospitalization for PCI related admission and have history of cirrhosis is 5 times \n higher than having a PCI without history of Cirrhosis with an adjusted odd ratio of 5.5(P-Value 0.026). \nConclusion: There is a significantly higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality in cirrhotic patients \n compared to the non-cirrhotic patients who underwent PCI.","PeriodicalId":16145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver","volume":"52 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Morbidity and Mortality Risks following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Cirrhosis\",\"authors\":\"Y. Al-Azzawi, Y. Al-Abboodi, Matthew Fasullo, A. Ridha, T. Naguib\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0889.1000216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The prevalence of coronary artery disease in cirrhotic population is estimated to be low and the risk \\n of bleeding in those who had percutaneous catheterization interventions (PCI) is not well studied yet. Our aim in this \\n study is to determine the morbidity and mortality risks in cirrhotic patient undergoing PCI. \\nMethods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2010. \\n The NIS is the largest publicly available inpatient health care database in the United States. It contains data from \\n more than 7 million hospital stays each year. People with Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related \\n admissions and a history of cirrhosis diagnosis were placed in the case group. Equivalent number of people with PCI \\n related admissions and no history of cirrhosis were identified randomly and Case-Control (PCI with cirrhosis vs. PCI \\n without cirrhosis) design is used. All genders, race was with age of 18-year-old and above was included. A binary \\n multivariate Logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the probability difference adjusted odd ratio. IBM \\n SPSS Statistics for Windows was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% and P value less \\n than 0.05 were determined to define significance. \\nResults: A total of 1218 of PCI related admissions were identified. 609 PCI related admissions with cirrhosis \\n (Cases group) and equivalent number of 609 admissions with PCI and no cirrhosis (Control group) were randomly \\n selected. 83.5% of the cohort represented by white race followed by Hispanic and African-American percentages of \\n 10% and 6.5% respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 60 years, 54% represented by male race. The mean \\n length of stay was 1.06 in the non-cirrhosis group compared to the 1.65 days in the cirrhosis group. Tables 1 and 2 (0.3%) out of 609 PCI related admission and no history of cirrhosis group had an Upper Gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) Vs. 11 (1.8%) in the PCI related admission with history of cirrhosis group. Inpatient mortality in the PCI+ non \\n Cirrhosis group was 0.3% vs. 1.8% in the PCI and Cirrhosis group. \\nThe probability of dying during hospitalization for PCI related admission and have history of cirrhosis is 5 times \\n higher than having a PCI without history of Cirrhosis with an adjusted odd ratio of 5.5(P-Value 0.026). \\nConclusion: There is a significantly higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality in cirrhotic patients \\n compared to the non-cirrhotic patients who underwent PCI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0889.1000216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0889.1000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:肝硬化人群中冠状动脉疾病的患病率估计较低,经皮导管介入治疗(PCI)患者出血的风险尚未得到很好的研究。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定接受PCI的肝硬化患者的发病率和死亡率风险。方法:我们使用2010年国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库进行回顾性分析。NIS是美国最大的可公开获得的住院医疗保健数据库。它包含每年700多万次住院的数据。与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相关且有肝硬化诊断史的患者被置于病例组。随机选取同等数量的PCI相关入院且无肝硬化史的患者,采用病例-对照(PCI合并肝硬化vs. PCI无肝硬化)设计。所有性别,种族,年龄在18岁及以上。采用二元多元Logistic回归统计检验检验概率差校正奇比。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows进行分析。以95%的置信区间(CI)和小于0.05的P值定义显著性。结果:共发现1218例PCI相关入院。随机选取609例PCI相关合并肝硬化入院患者(病例组)和609例同等数量的PCI合并合并无肝硬化入院患者(对照组)。白人占83.5%,其次是西班牙裔和非裔美国人,分别占10%和6.5%。队列的平均年龄为60岁,男性占54%。非肝硬化组的平均住院时间为1.06天,而肝硬化组为1.65天。表1和表2中609例PCI相关入院且无肝硬化史的患者(0.3%)发生上消化道出血(UGIB),而有肝硬化史的PCI相关入院患者(11例)发生上消化道出血(1.8%)。PCI+非肝硬化组的住院死亡率为0.3%,PCI+肝硬化组为1.8%。有肝硬化病史的PCI患者住院期间死亡的概率是无肝硬化病史PCI患者的5倍,调整奇数比为5.5(p值为0.026)。结论:与接受PCI治疗的非肝硬化患者相比,肝硬化患者发生胃肠道出血和死亡率的风险明显更高。
The Morbidity and Mortality Risks following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Cirrhosis
Background: The prevalence of coronary artery disease in cirrhotic population is estimated to be low and the risk
of bleeding in those who had percutaneous catheterization interventions (PCI) is not well studied yet. Our aim in this
study is to determine the morbidity and mortality risks in cirrhotic patient undergoing PCI.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2010.
The NIS is the largest publicly available inpatient health care database in the United States. It contains data from
more than 7 million hospital stays each year. People with Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related
admissions and a history of cirrhosis diagnosis were placed in the case group. Equivalent number of people with PCI
related admissions and no history of cirrhosis were identified randomly and Case-Control (PCI with cirrhosis vs. PCI
without cirrhosis) design is used. All genders, race was with age of 18-year-old and above was included. A binary
multivariate Logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the probability difference adjusted odd ratio. IBM
SPSS Statistics for Windows was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% and P value less
than 0.05 were determined to define significance.
Results: A total of 1218 of PCI related admissions were identified. 609 PCI related admissions with cirrhosis
(Cases group) and equivalent number of 609 admissions with PCI and no cirrhosis (Control group) were randomly
selected. 83.5% of the cohort represented by white race followed by Hispanic and African-American percentages of
10% and 6.5% respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 60 years, 54% represented by male race. The mean
length of stay was 1.06 in the non-cirrhosis group compared to the 1.65 days in the cirrhosis group. Tables 1 and 2 (0.3%) out of 609 PCI related admission and no history of cirrhosis group had an Upper Gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) Vs. 11 (1.8%) in the PCI related admission with history of cirrhosis group. Inpatient mortality in the PCI+ non
Cirrhosis group was 0.3% vs. 1.8% in the PCI and Cirrhosis group.
The probability of dying during hospitalization for PCI related admission and have history of cirrhosis is 5 times
higher than having a PCI without history of Cirrhosis with an adjusted odd ratio of 5.5(P-Value 0.026).
Conclusion: There is a significantly higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality in cirrhotic patients
compared to the non-cirrhotic patients who underwent PCI.