某非电气化铁路创新列车技术能耗比较

C. Depature, T. Letrouvé
{"title":"某非电气化铁路创新列车技术能耗比较","authors":"C. Depature, T. Letrouvé","doi":"10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compare the energy performance of several railway traction technologies. After validating the powertrain model of a regional diesel train with experimental measurements, an energy comparison of different green technologies is carried out: hybrid diesel train, battery train and fuel cell train. This initial analysis shows that hybridization, for example, allows energy savings of up to 20% on the nonelectrified track studied, while battery traction alone saves up to 70%. This study is a first step in choosing the use of a green technology, which must be carried out in accordance with a territorial context. The economic aspects, the infrastructure needed and the operating requirements of the railway equipment will have to be integrated in a future study.","PeriodicalId":6851,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Train Technologies Energy Comparison on One Non Electrified Railway\",\"authors\":\"C. Depature, T. Letrouvé\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compare the energy performance of several railway traction technologies. After validating the powertrain model of a regional diesel train with experimental measurements, an energy comparison of different green technologies is carried out: hybrid diesel train, battery train and fuel cell train. This initial analysis shows that hybridization, for example, allows energy savings of up to 20% on the nonelectrified track studied, while battery traction alone saves up to 70%. This study is a first step in choosing the use of a green technology, which must be carried out in accordance with a territorial context. The economic aspects, the infrastructure needed and the operating requirements of the railway equipment will have to be integrated in a future study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了几种铁路牵引技术的能源性能。在对某区域柴油列车动力系统模型进行实验验证的基础上,对混合动力柴油列车、蓄电池列车和燃料电池列车三种绿色技术进行了能量比较。例如,初步分析表明,在非电气化轨道上,混合动力可以节省高达20%的能源,而单独使用电池牵引可以节省高达70%的能源。这项研究是选择使用绿色技术的第一步,必须根据地域情况进行。经济方面、所需的基础设施和铁路设备的操作要求将在今后的研究中综合考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative Train Technologies Energy Comparison on One Non Electrified Railway
This paper compare the energy performance of several railway traction technologies. After validating the powertrain model of a regional diesel train with experimental measurements, an energy comparison of different green technologies is carried out: hybrid diesel train, battery train and fuel cell train. This initial analysis shows that hybridization, for example, allows energy savings of up to 20% on the nonelectrified track studied, while battery traction alone saves up to 70%. This study is a first step in choosing the use of a green technology, which must be carried out in accordance with a territorial context. The economic aspects, the infrastructure needed and the operating requirements of the railway equipment will have to be integrated in a future study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Welcome from the Chair of the VPPC Steering Committee Energy Management Strategy for a Fuel cell/Lead acid battery/ Ultracapacitor hybrid electric vehicle Sizing of renewable energy and storage resources in railway substations according to load shaving level Estimating the location of plugs in molten-salt pipes Robust Design of Combined Control Strategy for Electric Vehicle with In-wheel Propulsion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1