东亚和西方文化中对强迫症的认知和理解的跨文化差异

Caroline H. Yang, G. Nestadt, J. Samuels, L. Doerfler
{"title":"东亚和西方文化中对强迫症的认知和理解的跨文化差异","authors":"Caroline H. Yang, G. Nestadt, J. Samuels, L. Doerfler","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2018.1468786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated cultural differences in beliefs about the etiology and management of OCD. Participants were 428 individuals from 13 countries in North America, Western Europe and South Asia who completed a questionnaire about a hypothetical individual who experienced OCD. Principal components analysis of the questionnaire items identified four factors; comparison of the four subscales revealed significant cross-cultural differences in how participants viewed the individual with OCD and ideas about how to help someone with the disorder. Compared to individuals in the USA and Western Europe, participants in East Asia had a more negative view of the person with OCD, were more likely to blame the person, to consider the obsessions and compulsions to be part of the individual’s personality and to recommend that the person not seek help from others. Participants from East Asian countries also were more likely to recommend alternative therapies like acupuncture and taking herbal medicines. Participants from Western countries had a more favourable view of psychosocial influences and psychosocial interventions for these problems.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"2 1","pages":"616 - 625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural differences in the perception and understanding of obsessive-compulsive disorder in East Asian and Western cultures\",\"authors\":\"Caroline H. Yang, G. Nestadt, J. Samuels, L. Doerfler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2018.1468786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigated cultural differences in beliefs about the etiology and management of OCD. Participants were 428 individuals from 13 countries in North America, Western Europe and South Asia who completed a questionnaire about a hypothetical individual who experienced OCD. Principal components analysis of the questionnaire items identified four factors; comparison of the four subscales revealed significant cross-cultural differences in how participants viewed the individual with OCD and ideas about how to help someone with the disorder. Compared to individuals in the USA and Western Europe, participants in East Asia had a more negative view of the person with OCD, were more likely to blame the person, to consider the obsessions and compulsions to be part of the individual’s personality and to recommend that the person not seek help from others. Participants from East Asian countries also were more likely to recommend alternative therapies like acupuncture and taking herbal medicines. Participants from Western countries had a more favourable view of psychosocial influences and psychosocial interventions for these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"616 - 625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1468786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2018.1468786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨了强迫症病因和治疗观念的文化差异。参与者是来自北美、西欧和南亚13个国家的428人,他们完成了一份关于一个假设患有强迫症的人的调查问卷。主成分分析确定了问卷项目的四个影响因素;四个分量表的比较揭示了参与者在如何看待强迫症患者和如何帮助强迫症患者的想法方面存在显著的跨文化差异。与美国和西欧的人相比,东亚的参与者对强迫症患者的看法更为消极,更有可能责怪患者,认为强迫症和强迫症是患者个性的一部分,并建议患者不要向他人寻求帮助。来自东亚国家的参与者也更有可能推荐针灸和服用草药等替代疗法。来自西方国家的参与者对这些问题的社会心理影响和社会心理干预有更积极的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-cultural differences in the perception and understanding of obsessive-compulsive disorder in East Asian and Western cultures
ABSTRACT This study investigated cultural differences in beliefs about the etiology and management of OCD. Participants were 428 individuals from 13 countries in North America, Western Europe and South Asia who completed a questionnaire about a hypothetical individual who experienced OCD. Principal components analysis of the questionnaire items identified four factors; comparison of the four subscales revealed significant cross-cultural differences in how participants viewed the individual with OCD and ideas about how to help someone with the disorder. Compared to individuals in the USA and Western Europe, participants in East Asia had a more negative view of the person with OCD, were more likely to blame the person, to consider the obsessions and compulsions to be part of the individual’s personality and to recommend that the person not seek help from others. Participants from East Asian countries also were more likely to recommend alternative therapies like acupuncture and taking herbal medicines. Participants from Western countries had a more favourable view of psychosocial influences and psychosocial interventions for these problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and psychological well-being of Albanian-American immigrants in the United States Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) in children and adolescents Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees Disabled or Deaf? Investigating mental health clinicians’ knowledge of and attitude towards Deafness as a culture* Experiences of HIV stigma in rural Southern religious settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1