老年患者颅内未破裂动脉瘤:手术和血管内治疗的结果

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Gerontology Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.6890/IJGE.202011_14(4).0011
T. Czernicki, P. Kunert, A. Nowak, J. Żyłkowski, M. Jaworski, A. Marchel
{"title":"老年患者颅内未破裂动脉瘤:手术和血管内治疗的结果","authors":"T. Czernicki, P. Kunert, A. Nowak, J. Żyłkowski, M. Jaworski, A. Marchel","doi":"10.6890/IJGE.202011_14(4).0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) in elderly patients is controversial, taking into consideration their limited life-expectancy and existing comorbidities. With advances in endovascular techniques, we decided to evaluate treatment results in this population and to assess results in surgically and endovascularly treated cases. Methods: Thirty six elderly patients, aged ≥ 70, with the total of 39 aneurysms, were treated. The possibility of endovascular treatment was considered as the first option and surgical treatment as the second method of intervention. Results: No patient died and no patient became bedridden after the procedures. In surgical group (14 UIA), deterioration was observed in five cases at the time of discharge, but persisted in only two cases at follow-up. In endovascular group (25 UIA), deterioration was observed in one case at the time of discharge and persisted at follow-up. Endovascular techniques included coils placement alone in nine (36%) procedures, coiling with stent placement in five (20%) procedures and stent placement alone in eleven (44%) procedures. Follow-up DSA revealed no treatment effect in three patients after stent placement alone (12% of endovascularly treated aneurysms). Of these, two patients were successfully retreated with second flow-diverting stent placement and one patient refused retreatment. Conclusion: Treatment of elderly patients with UIA is relatively safe and effective. Worse short-term and long-term outcomes were observed among the operated compared to embolized patients. In patients treated with stent placement alone, treatment failure and the need for the next stage of embolization in some cases should be taken into account.","PeriodicalId":50321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gerontology","volume":"235 1","pages":"310-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Elderly Patients: Results of Surgical and Endovascular Treatment\",\"authors\":\"T. Czernicki, P. Kunert, A. Nowak, J. Żyłkowski, M. Jaworski, A. Marchel\",\"doi\":\"10.6890/IJGE.202011_14(4).0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) in elderly patients is controversial, taking into consideration their limited life-expectancy and existing comorbidities. With advances in endovascular techniques, we decided to evaluate treatment results in this population and to assess results in surgically and endovascularly treated cases. Methods: Thirty six elderly patients, aged ≥ 70, with the total of 39 aneurysms, were treated. The possibility of endovascular treatment was considered as the first option and surgical treatment as the second method of intervention. Results: No patient died and no patient became bedridden after the procedures. In surgical group (14 UIA), deterioration was observed in five cases at the time of discharge, but persisted in only two cases at follow-up. In endovascular group (25 UIA), deterioration was observed in one case at the time of discharge and persisted at follow-up. Endovascular techniques included coils placement alone in nine (36%) procedures, coiling with stent placement in five (20%) procedures and stent placement alone in eleven (44%) procedures. Follow-up DSA revealed no treatment effect in three patients after stent placement alone (12% of endovascularly treated aneurysms). Of these, two patients were successfully retreated with second flow-diverting stent placement and one patient refused retreatment. Conclusion: Treatment of elderly patients with UIA is relatively safe and effective. Worse short-term and long-term outcomes were observed among the operated compared to embolized patients. In patients treated with stent placement alone, treatment failure and the need for the next stage of embolization in some cases should be taken into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gerontology\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"310-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202011_14(4).0011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202011_14(4).0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到老年患者有限的预期寿命和存在的合并症,未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)的治疗存在争议。随着血管内技术的进步,我们决定评估这一人群的治疗结果,并评估手术和血管内治疗病例的结果。方法:选取年龄≥70岁的老年患者36例,共39个动脉瘤。血管内治疗为第一选择,手术治疗为第二干预方法。结果:术后无患者死亡,无患者卧床。在手术组(14例UIA)中,5例在出院时出现恶化,但随访时只有2例持续恶化。在血管内组(25 UIA), 1例患者在出院时出现恶化,并在随访中持续。血管内技术包括9例(36%)手术中单独放置线圈,5例(20%)手术中单独放置支架,11例(44%)手术中单独放置支架。随访DSA显示,单独放置支架后3例患者(占血管内动脉瘤治疗的12%)无治疗效果。其中,两名患者通过第二次分流支架置放成功撤退,一名患者拒绝再治疗。结论:老年UIA患者的治疗相对安全有效。与栓塞患者相比,手术患者的短期和长期预后更差。在单独接受支架置入术治疗的患者中,在某些情况下,治疗失败和下一阶段的栓塞需要被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Elderly Patients: Results of Surgical and Endovascular Treatment
Background: Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) in elderly patients is controversial, taking into consideration their limited life-expectancy and existing comorbidities. With advances in endovascular techniques, we decided to evaluate treatment results in this population and to assess results in surgically and endovascularly treated cases. Methods: Thirty six elderly patients, aged ≥ 70, with the total of 39 aneurysms, were treated. The possibility of endovascular treatment was considered as the first option and surgical treatment as the second method of intervention. Results: No patient died and no patient became bedridden after the procedures. In surgical group (14 UIA), deterioration was observed in five cases at the time of discharge, but persisted in only two cases at follow-up. In endovascular group (25 UIA), deterioration was observed in one case at the time of discharge and persisted at follow-up. Endovascular techniques included coils placement alone in nine (36%) procedures, coiling with stent placement in five (20%) procedures and stent placement alone in eleven (44%) procedures. Follow-up DSA revealed no treatment effect in three patients after stent placement alone (12% of endovascularly treated aneurysms). Of these, two patients were successfully retreated with second flow-diverting stent placement and one patient refused retreatment. Conclusion: Treatment of elderly patients with UIA is relatively safe and effective. Worse short-term and long-term outcomes were observed among the operated compared to embolized patients. In patients treated with stent placement alone, treatment failure and the need for the next stage of embolization in some cases should be taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish original research and review papers on all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those dealing with critical care and emergency medicine. The IJGE aims to explore and clarify the medical science and philosophy in all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those in the emergency and critical care medicine. The IJGE is determined not only to be a professional journal in gerontology, but also a leading source of information for the developing field of geriatric emergency and critical care medicine. It is a pioneer in Asia. Topics in the IJGE cover the advancement of diagnosis and management in urgent, serious and chronic intractable diseases in later life, preventive medicine, long-term care of disability, ethical issues in the diseased elderly and biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry involving diseases associated with age. We did not limit the territory to only critical or emergency condition inasmuch as chronic diseases are frequently brought about by inappropriate management of acute problems.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Geriatric Assessment in Predicting Postoperative Morbidity after Laparoscopic Surgery in Older Patients: A Systematic Review Improving cognitive function in older adults through Mental Abacus Training: A Single-Arm Pilot Study The Association between Pulmonary Function and Metabolic Syndrome in Koreans: A Cross-Sectional Study Relationships of Thyroid Hormones in the Normal Range to Coronary Artery Disease in Different Age Groups Investigation of an Elder Abuse Case in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1