推理中的联系和连续性

Donald S. Lee
{"title":"推理中的联系和连续性","authors":"Donald S. Lee","doi":"10.5840/swjphil19801119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inference connects conceptual entities to each other; in fact, it is definitionaily true to say inference is connective. Inference does not create conceptual connections, either formal or semantic (meaning); it makes implicit connections explicit. If I know that all A is B and that all B is C, then by inference I can know that all A is C. The conclusion is deductively connected to the premises whether or not anyone ever actually infers it. The deductive connection becomes known to me by virtue of inference. Confusion has been rife in philosophic discussions on the subject of \"connection,\"1 and some clarity is needed on a fundamental level. Much, though not all, of the confusion is due largely to crudely mixing aspects of connection with aspects of juxtaposition (called \"conjunction\" by Hume).2 The lack of properly understanding connection goes hand-in-hand with a lack of sophistication about the contrast between genuine continuity and discreteness.3 The connectivity of inference is analyzable in terms of continuity and not discreteness, while, in contrast, juxtaposition is understood in terms of discreteness.","PeriodicalId":83275,"journal":{"name":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","volume":"9 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connection and Continuity in Inference\",\"authors\":\"Donald S. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/swjphil19801119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inference connects conceptual entities to each other; in fact, it is definitionaily true to say inference is connective. Inference does not create conceptual connections, either formal or semantic (meaning); it makes implicit connections explicit. If I know that all A is B and that all B is C, then by inference I can know that all A is C. The conclusion is deductively connected to the premises whether or not anyone ever actually infers it. The deductive connection becomes known to me by virtue of inference. Confusion has been rife in philosophic discussions on the subject of \\\"connection,\\\"1 and some clarity is needed on a fundamental level. Much, though not all, of the confusion is due largely to crudely mixing aspects of connection with aspects of juxtaposition (called \\\"conjunction\\\" by Hume).2 The lack of properly understanding connection goes hand-in-hand with a lack of sophistication about the contrast between genuine continuity and discreteness.3 The connectivity of inference is analyzable in terms of continuity and not discreteness, while, in contrast, juxtaposition is understood in terms of discreteness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southwestern journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southwestern journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/swjphil19801119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/swjphil19801119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推理将概念实体彼此连接起来;事实上,我们可以明确地说推理是有联系的。推理不会产生概念上的联系,无论是形式的还是语义的(意义);它使隐式连接显化。如果我知道所有的A都是B,所有的B都是C,那么通过推论,我可以知道所有的A都是C,结论是演绎地与前提联系在一起的,不管有没有人真的推断出来。通过推理,我知道了演绎的联系。在关于“联系”这个主题的哲学讨论中,混淆一直很普遍,需要在基本层面上进行一些澄清。许多,虽然不是全部,混乱很大程度上是由于粗糙地混合了连接方面和并列方面(休谟称之为“连接”)缺乏对联系的正确理解与缺乏对真正的连续性和离散性之间的对比的复杂性是密切相关的推理的连通性是用连续性而不是离散性来分析的,而与之相反,并置是用离散性来理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Connection and Continuity in Inference
Inference connects conceptual entities to each other; in fact, it is definitionaily true to say inference is connective. Inference does not create conceptual connections, either formal or semantic (meaning); it makes implicit connections explicit. If I know that all A is B and that all B is C, then by inference I can know that all A is C. The conclusion is deductively connected to the premises whether or not anyone ever actually infers it. The deductive connection becomes known to me by virtue of inference. Confusion has been rife in philosophic discussions on the subject of "connection,"1 and some clarity is needed on a fundamental level. Much, though not all, of the confusion is due largely to crudely mixing aspects of connection with aspects of juxtaposition (called "conjunction" by Hume).2 The lack of properly understanding connection goes hand-in-hand with a lack of sophistication about the contrast between genuine continuity and discreteness.3 The connectivity of inference is analyzable in terms of continuity and not discreteness, while, in contrast, juxtaposition is understood in terms of discreteness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology: A New Way into Transcendental Phenomenology?: Some Thoughts on Husserl’s Last Part of the Crisis Nietzsche, Volume I: The Will to Power as Art The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of the Thing Husserl’s Relations to British Empiricism Heidegger and the Problem of Being-With
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1