{"title":"《关于斯塔提乌斯的三个笔记》，底比德5 (11-16);20;29-32)","authors":"Baruch Martínez Zepeda","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Notes on Statius, Thebaid 5 (11-16; 20-23; 29-32)\",\"authors\":\"Baruch Martínez Zepeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1568525x-bja10150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three Notes on Statius, Thebaid 5 (11-16; 20-23; 29-32)
This article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.
期刊介绍：
Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
