结构化的课程,以提高儿科住院医师的信心和技能,提供育儿建议

Alexandria Caldwell, H. Qasimyar, Lisa Shumate, Michael P. Anderson, Amanda S. Cherry, Cheryl Bryant, A. Bax
{"title":"结构化的课程,以提高儿科住院医师的信心和技能,提供育儿建议","authors":"Alexandria Caldwell, H. Qasimyar, Lisa Shumate, Michael P. Anderson, Amanda S. Cherry, Cheryl Bryant, A. Bax","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2019.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Residents receive little parenting education despite its potential to improve parenting behavior and decrease child maltreatment despite the inclusion of parenting content on board certification examinations. Teaching residents how to discuss parenting and foster positive parent-child relationships is essential to treating the whole person in osteopathic pediatric medicine. Objective To improve pediatric and internal medicine–pediatric residents’ knowledge, confidence, and skills in providing parenting advice. Methods Four toddler parenting and discipline modules were developed. During continuity clinic, residents viewed and discussed modules with faculty. Residents completed a confidence and knowledge questionnaire before and after the curriculum, provided a self-report of use of skills learned, and completed a feasibility survey. Faculty also completed a feasibility survey. Results Forty-one of 61 residents (67%) participated in the study. Before participation, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) resident score for confidence in giving advice was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) (on a 10-point scale), increasing to 7.0 (6.0-8.0) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 8.0 (8.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules. Median (IQR) score on board-style questions was 8.0 (7.0-9.0) (on a 12-point scale) before participating in the modules and 8.5 (7.5-9.5) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 9.0 (7.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules after participation; the increase was not statistically significant. Nine faculty and 29 residents completed the modules and responded to the exit survey regarding feasibility and acceptability of the curriculum. On a 4-point scale (4 being excellent), sessions had an overall mean (SD) rating of 3.7 (0.5) by faculty and 3.5 (0.5) by residents. Most residents (27 [93.1%]) reported interest in more modules, and 28 residents (96.6%) reported using information learned from the modules during clinic visits. Conclusion Confidence delivering parenting advice increased among residents who completed the curriculum modules. Faculty and residents reported high feasibility ratings, and residents endorsed application of skills during clinic visits and interest in more modules.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"748 - 755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structured Curriculum to Improve Pediatric Resident Confidence and Skills in Providing Parenting Advice\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria Caldwell, H. Qasimyar, Lisa Shumate, Michael P. Anderson, Amanda S. Cherry, Cheryl Bryant, A. Bax\",\"doi\":\"10.7556/jaoa.2019.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Context Residents receive little parenting education despite its potential to improve parenting behavior and decrease child maltreatment despite the inclusion of parenting content on board certification examinations. Teaching residents how to discuss parenting and foster positive parent-child relationships is essential to treating the whole person in osteopathic pediatric medicine. Objective To improve pediatric and internal medicine–pediatric residents’ knowledge, confidence, and skills in providing parenting advice. Methods Four toddler parenting and discipline modules were developed. During continuity clinic, residents viewed and discussed modules with faculty. Residents completed a confidence and knowledge questionnaire before and after the curriculum, provided a self-report of use of skills learned, and completed a feasibility survey. Faculty also completed a feasibility survey. Results Forty-one of 61 residents (67%) participated in the study. Before participation, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) resident score for confidence in giving advice was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) (on a 10-point scale), increasing to 7.0 (6.0-8.0) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 8.0 (8.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules. Median (IQR) score on board-style questions was 8.0 (7.0-9.0) (on a 12-point scale) before participating in the modules and 8.5 (7.5-9.5) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 9.0 (7.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules after participation; the increase was not statistically significant. Nine faculty and 29 residents completed the modules and responded to the exit survey regarding feasibility and acceptability of the curriculum. On a 4-point scale (4 being excellent), sessions had an overall mean (SD) rating of 3.7 (0.5) by faculty and 3.5 (0.5) by residents. Most residents (27 [93.1%]) reported interest in more modules, and 28 residents (96.6%) reported using information learned from the modules during clinic visits. Conclusion Confidence delivering parenting advice increased among residents who completed the curriculum modules. Faculty and residents reported high feasibility ratings, and residents endorsed application of skills during clinic visits and interest in more modules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"748 - 755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在住院医生的认证考试中包含了育儿内容,但育儿教育有可能改善父母行为,减少儿童虐待,但住院医生接受的育儿教育很少。教导住院医师如何讨论育儿和培养积极的亲子关系,对于整骨疗法儿科医学治疗整个人是必不可少的。目的提高儿科和内科住院医师提供育儿建议的知识、信心和技能。方法开发4个幼儿教养与管教模块。在连续性门诊期间,住院医生与教师一起观看和讨论模块。学员在课程前后分别填写了一份信心和知识问卷,提供了一份使用所学技能的自我报告,并完成了一份可行性调查。学院还完成了可行性调查。结果61名居民中有41人(67%)参与了研究。在参与之前,居民给出建议的信心得分中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为6.0(4.0-7.0)(10分制),完成1至3个模块的居民增加到7.0(6.0-8.0),完成4个模块的居民增加到8.0(8.0-9.0)。参加模块前,板式问题的中位数(IQR)为8.0(7.0-9.0)(12分制),完成1 - 3个模块的中位数为8.5(7.5-9.5),完成4个模块的中位数为9.0(7.0-9.0)。这一增长在统计学上并不显著。9名教师和29名住院医生完成了这些模块,并对课程的可行性和可接受性进行了调查。在4分制(4为优秀)的评分中,教师的总体平均评分为3.7(0.5),住院医生的总体平均评分为3.5(0.5)。大多数住院医生(27名[93.1%])表示对更多的模块感兴趣,28名住院医生(96.6%)表示在门诊就诊时使用了从模块中学到的信息。结论完成课程模块的住院医师对提供育儿建议的信心有所提高。教师和住院医生报告了很高的可行性评分,住院医生也赞同在门诊就诊期间应用技能,并对更多模块感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structured Curriculum to Improve Pediatric Resident Confidence and Skills in Providing Parenting Advice
Abstract Context Residents receive little parenting education despite its potential to improve parenting behavior and decrease child maltreatment despite the inclusion of parenting content on board certification examinations. Teaching residents how to discuss parenting and foster positive parent-child relationships is essential to treating the whole person in osteopathic pediatric medicine. Objective To improve pediatric and internal medicine–pediatric residents’ knowledge, confidence, and skills in providing parenting advice. Methods Four toddler parenting and discipline modules were developed. During continuity clinic, residents viewed and discussed modules with faculty. Residents completed a confidence and knowledge questionnaire before and after the curriculum, provided a self-report of use of skills learned, and completed a feasibility survey. Faculty also completed a feasibility survey. Results Forty-one of 61 residents (67%) participated in the study. Before participation, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) resident score for confidence in giving advice was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) (on a 10-point scale), increasing to 7.0 (6.0-8.0) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 8.0 (8.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules. Median (IQR) score on board-style questions was 8.0 (7.0-9.0) (on a 12-point scale) before participating in the modules and 8.5 (7.5-9.5) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 9.0 (7.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules after participation; the increase was not statistically significant. Nine faculty and 29 residents completed the modules and responded to the exit survey regarding feasibility and acceptability of the curriculum. On a 4-point scale (4 being excellent), sessions had an overall mean (SD) rating of 3.7 (0.5) by faculty and 3.5 (0.5) by residents. Most residents (27 [93.1%]) reported interest in more modules, and 28 residents (96.6%) reported using information learned from the modules during clinic visits. Conclusion Confidence delivering parenting advice increased among residents who completed the curriculum modules. Faculty and residents reported high feasibility ratings, and residents endorsed application of skills during clinic visits and interest in more modules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous neonatal subcutaneous emphysema: analysis of neonatal management Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data Cranial osteopathic techniques and electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power: a controlled crossover trial Response to “Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data” UGRC 2021 recommendations on GME transition: pros and cons, opportunities and limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1