苏丹和南苏丹:对其棘手冲突的解释

Ian S. Spears, P. Wight
{"title":"苏丹和南苏丹:对其棘手冲突的解释","authors":"Ian S. Spears, P. Wight","doi":"10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.5.2.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the persistence of violent conflicts in the two Sudans. It examines standard macro-approaches to conflict resolution—democracy, inclusiveness, intervention, secession, as well as the more radical “let-them-fight” thesis—to demonstrate the limitations on the ability of outsiders to manage the conflicts. It concludes that relying on these approaches alone is not likely to lead to meaningful and lasting conflict resolution. The causes of Sudan’s and South Sudan’s wars run deeper than a failure to be inclusive and are instead connected to the nature of the state in Africa.","PeriodicalId":7615,"journal":{"name":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sudan and South Sudan: Accounting for Their Intractable Conflicts\",\"authors\":\"Ian S. Spears, P. Wight\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.5.2.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the persistence of violent conflicts in the two Sudans. It examines standard macro-approaches to conflict resolution—democracy, inclusiveness, intervention, secession, as well as the more radical “let-them-fight” thesis—to demonstrate the limitations on the ability of outsiders to manage the conflicts. It concludes that relying on these approaches alone is not likely to lead to meaningful and lasting conflict resolution. The causes of Sudan’s and South Sudan’s wars run deeper than a failure to be inclusive and are instead connected to the nature of the state in Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.5.2.143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.5.2.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文考察了两个苏丹持续不断的暴力冲突。它考察了解决冲突的标准宏观方法——民主、包容、干预、分裂,以及更激进的“让他们去战斗”的论点——以证明局外人管理冲突的能力是有限的。它的结论是,仅仅依靠这些方法不太可能导致有意义和持久的冲突解决。苏丹和南苏丹战争的原因远不止是缺乏包容性,而是与非洲国家的性质有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sudan and South Sudan: Accounting for Their Intractable Conflicts
This paper examines the persistence of violent conflicts in the two Sudans. It examines standard macro-approaches to conflict resolution—democracy, inclusiveness, intervention, secession, as well as the more radical “let-them-fight” thesis—to demonstrate the limitations on the ability of outsiders to manage the conflicts. It concludes that relying on these approaches alone is not likely to lead to meaningful and lasting conflict resolution. The causes of Sudan’s and South Sudan’s wars run deeper than a failure to be inclusive and are instead connected to the nature of the state in Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peace Clubs in Nigerian Schools: Impact and Policy Implications Communal Violence in Nigeria, 2014–21: Mapping, Modeling, and Trends Forgive and for—What? How Sierra Leone Has Tried to Ignore Eleven Years of Traumatic Experience African Spirituality and the Gukurahundi Mass Grave Exhumations in Zimbabwe Migratory Pastoralism, Herders-Farmers Conflicts, and the Ruga Settlement Policy in North Central Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1