通过为脊髓损伤退伍军人提供专业服务(ACCESS-Vets)实现竞争性、定制化就业:一项随机临床试验方案

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.3233/jvr-230016
Lisa Ottomanelli, T. Smith, B. Cotner, Peter A. Toyinbo, Hari H Venkatachalam, S. McDonald, L. Goetz, Julie Cessna-Palas, S. Mendelson, Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga, Areana Cruz, Liron S McCauley, Bradford S Pierce
{"title":"通过为脊髓损伤退伍军人提供专业服务(ACCESS-Vets)实现竞争性、定制化就业:一项随机临床试验方案","authors":"Lisa Ottomanelli, T. Smith, B. Cotner, Peter A. Toyinbo, Hari H Venkatachalam, S. McDonald, L. Goetz, Julie Cessna-Palas, S. Mendelson, Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga, Areana Cruz, Liron S McCauley, Bradford S Pierce","doi":"10.3233/jvr-230016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: To date, the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model is the only vocational intervention that has been rigorously studied and shown to be effective with Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Customized Employment (CE) is an innovative vocational intervention with promising results among people with disabilities which has yet to be tested in persons with SCI. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a Customized Employment (CE) intervention adapted for SCI rehabilitation is more effective than the standard care (IPS) for helping Veterans with SCI obtain and maintain employment. METHODS: A 4-year, 2-site randomized clinical trial (RCT) with concurrent mixed methods using an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. The primary outcome is competitive integrated employment as defined by the Work Innovation and Opportunity Act. Secondary outcomes are employment indicators, quality of life (QOL), and participation. RESULTS: This is a methods paper so there are no results to present at this time. CONCLUSION: The proportion of Veterans who attain employment will be greater for the CE group than the IPS group and they will outperform the IPS group on other employment-related metrics (e.g., higher job satisfaction, wages, and retention). Employed Veterans will demonstrate significant improvements in self-sufficiency, QOL, and participation. Qualitative data obtained from interviews will assist with adaptation strategies and will identify barriers to implementing CE.","PeriodicalId":47208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving competitive, customized employment through specialized services for Veterans with spinal cord injuries (ACCESS-Vets): A randomized clinical trial protocol\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Ottomanelli, T. Smith, B. Cotner, Peter A. Toyinbo, Hari H Venkatachalam, S. McDonald, L. Goetz, Julie Cessna-Palas, S. Mendelson, Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga, Areana Cruz, Liron S McCauley, Bradford S Pierce\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jvr-230016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: To date, the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model is the only vocational intervention that has been rigorously studied and shown to be effective with Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Customized Employment (CE) is an innovative vocational intervention with promising results among people with disabilities which has yet to be tested in persons with SCI. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a Customized Employment (CE) intervention adapted for SCI rehabilitation is more effective than the standard care (IPS) for helping Veterans with SCI obtain and maintain employment. METHODS: A 4-year, 2-site randomized clinical trial (RCT) with concurrent mixed methods using an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. The primary outcome is competitive integrated employment as defined by the Work Innovation and Opportunity Act. Secondary outcomes are employment indicators, quality of life (QOL), and participation. RESULTS: This is a methods paper so there are no results to present at this time. CONCLUSION: The proportion of Veterans who attain employment will be greater for the CE group than the IPS group and they will outperform the IPS group on other employment-related metrics (e.g., higher job satisfaction, wages, and retention). Employed Veterans will demonstrate significant improvements in self-sufficiency, QOL, and participation. Qualitative data obtained from interviews will assist with adaptation strategies and will identify barriers to implementing CE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-230016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-230016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:到目前为止,个体安置和支持(IPS)模式是唯一一种经过严格研究并显示对脊髓损伤退伍军人有效的职业干预。定制就业(CE)是一种创新的职业干预措施,在残疾人中有良好的效果,但尚未在脊髓损伤患者中进行测试。目的:确定适用于脊髓损伤康复的定制就业(CE)干预是否比标准护理(IPS)更有效地帮助脊髓损伤退伍军人获得和维持就业。方法:一项为期4年的2点随机临床试验(RCT),采用意向治疗(ITT)方法并行混合方法。主要结果是《工作创新与机会法》所定义的竞争性综合就业。次要结果是就业指标、生活质量(QOL)和参与。结果:这是一篇方法论文,所以目前没有结果。结论:CE组获得就业的退伍军人比例将高于IPS组,并且在其他与就业相关的指标上(例如,更高的工作满意度,工资和保留率)他们将优于IPS组。有工作的退伍军人将在自给自足、生活质量和参与方面表现出显著的改善。从访谈中获得的定性数据将有助于制定适应战略,并将确定实施环境教育的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achieving competitive, customized employment through specialized services for Veterans with spinal cord injuries (ACCESS-Vets): A randomized clinical trial protocol
BACKGROUND: To date, the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model is the only vocational intervention that has been rigorously studied and shown to be effective with Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Customized Employment (CE) is an innovative vocational intervention with promising results among people with disabilities which has yet to be tested in persons with SCI. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a Customized Employment (CE) intervention adapted for SCI rehabilitation is more effective than the standard care (IPS) for helping Veterans with SCI obtain and maintain employment. METHODS: A 4-year, 2-site randomized clinical trial (RCT) with concurrent mixed methods using an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. The primary outcome is competitive integrated employment as defined by the Work Innovation and Opportunity Act. Secondary outcomes are employment indicators, quality of life (QOL), and participation. RESULTS: This is a methods paper so there are no results to present at this time. CONCLUSION: The proportion of Veterans who attain employment will be greater for the CE group than the IPS group and they will outperform the IPS group on other employment-related metrics (e.g., higher job satisfaction, wages, and retention). Employed Veterans will demonstrate significant improvements in self-sufficiency, QOL, and participation. Qualitative data obtained from interviews will assist with adaptation strategies and will identify barriers to implementing CE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation will provide a forum for discussion and dissemination of information about the major areas that constitute vocational rehabilitation. Periodically, there will be topics that are directed either to specific themes such as long term care or different disability groups such as those with psychiatric impairment. Often a guest editor who is an expert in the given area will provide leadership on a specific topic issue. However, all articles received directly or submitted for a special issue are welcome for peer review. The emphasis will be on publishing rehabilitation articles that have immediate application for helping rehabilitation counselors, psychologists and other professionals in providing direct services to people with disabilities.
期刊最新文献
Needs of human resource professionals in implicit bias and disability inclusion training: A focus group study. Effect of company-driven disability diversity initiatives: A multi-case study across industries Vocational rehabilitation applicants, the services they receive, and their employment outcomes Discovering ME: An innovative planning tool for students with significant disabilities ABLE account use among supplemental security income recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1