一项随机对照研究比较静脉注射芬太尼和雾化芬太尼在全麻下接受选择性乳房手术的患者术后疼痛缓解

B. T
{"title":"一项随机对照研究比较静脉注射芬太尼和雾化芬太尼在全麻下接受选择性乳房手术的患者术后疼痛缓解","authors":"B. T","doi":"10.26611/1015838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Relief of post operative pain with minimal side effects is a major goal during postanesthesia care. Intravenous fentanyl has been the gold standard for post operative pain relief. Fentanyl is a mu opioid receptor agonist characterised by high potency, rapid onset, short duration of action, lipid solubility and an apparent absence of serious side effects normally associated with opioids. Aim: To compare analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl for post operative pain relief in patients undergoing breast surgeries under general anesthesia. Objectives: 1. To assess the analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl in comparison to IV fentanyl for post-operative pain relief after breast surgeries. 2. To study Incidence and severity of side effects of fentanyl such as sedation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, if any. Methodology: After our Hospital Research and Ethics Committee approval and obtaining informed written consent 90 patients aged between 20 and 65 years, belonging to ASA physical status I or II who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries under general anesthesia were included in this randomized control study. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 patients each to receive either Intravenous fentanyl 1mcg/kg (group C), or nebulised Fentanyl 2mcg/kg (Group N1) and nebulised Fentanyl 3mcg/kg (group N2). Results: These patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics age, sex, height, weight, ASA grading. Heart rates, SBP, DBP, MAP, SPO2 at basal value, after intubation, after extubation, and in PACU were similar and comparable in groups C, N1, N2. VAS scores were comparable at 0 min in groups C, N1, N2. At 5,10,15 min VAS scores were lower in control group than group N1 and N2. (P value The mean VAS scores increased in control group after 45 min where as in group N1 scores increased after 75min and in group N2 after 90min. The incidence of PONV was higher in group C compared to groups N1, N2. Statistically significant difference was observed between PONV grade among the three groups (P=0.093) Incidence of respiratory depression was compared in groups C,N1,N2. The P value is 0.0326 which is statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":18595,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised control study comparing intravenous fentanyl vs nebulised fentanyl for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing elective breast surgeries under general anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"B. T\",\"doi\":\"10.26611/1015838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Relief of post operative pain with minimal side effects is a major goal during postanesthesia care. Intravenous fentanyl has been the gold standard for post operative pain relief. Fentanyl is a mu opioid receptor agonist characterised by high potency, rapid onset, short duration of action, lipid solubility and an apparent absence of serious side effects normally associated with opioids. Aim: To compare analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl for post operative pain relief in patients undergoing breast surgeries under general anesthesia. Objectives: 1. To assess the analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl in comparison to IV fentanyl for post-operative pain relief after breast surgeries. 2. To study Incidence and severity of side effects of fentanyl such as sedation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, if any. Methodology: After our Hospital Research and Ethics Committee approval and obtaining informed written consent 90 patients aged between 20 and 65 years, belonging to ASA physical status I or II who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries under general anesthesia were included in this randomized control study. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 patients each to receive either Intravenous fentanyl 1mcg/kg (group C), or nebulised Fentanyl 2mcg/kg (Group N1) and nebulised Fentanyl 3mcg/kg (group N2). Results: These patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics age, sex, height, weight, ASA grading. Heart rates, SBP, DBP, MAP, SPO2 at basal value, after intubation, after extubation, and in PACU were similar and comparable in groups C, N1, N2. VAS scores were comparable at 0 min in groups C, N1, N2. At 5,10,15 min VAS scores were lower in control group than group N1 and N2. (P value The mean VAS scores increased in control group after 45 min where as in group N1 scores increased after 75min and in group N2 after 90min. The incidence of PONV was higher in group C compared to groups N1, N2. Statistically significant difference was observed between PONV grade among the three groups (P=0.093) Incidence of respiratory depression was compared in groups C,N1,N2. The P value is 0.0326 which is statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26611/1015838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/1015838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减轻术后疼痛,减少副作用是麻醉后护理的主要目标。静脉注射芬太尼一直是术后缓解疼痛的金标准。芬太尼是一种阿片受体激动剂,其特点是效力高、起效快、作用持续时间短、脂溶性好,而且明显没有阿片受体相关的严重副作用。目的:比较芬太尼雾化与静脉注射芬太尼对全麻乳腺手术患者术后疼痛的镇痛效果。目的:1。评价雾化芬太尼与静脉注射芬太尼对乳房术后疼痛缓解的镇痛效果。2. 研究芬太尼副作用的发生率和严重程度,如镇静、术后恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制等。方法:经我院研究与伦理委员会批准并获得知情书面同意后,90例年龄在20 - 65岁之间、ASA身体状态为I或II的患者被纳入本随机对照研究,这些患者计划在全身麻醉下进行选择性乳房手术。患者被随机分为三组,每组30例,每组接受静脉注射芬太尼1mcg/kg (C组),或雾化芬太尼2mcg/kg (N1组)和雾化芬太尼3mcg/kg (N2组)。结果:两组患者在人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、身高、体重、ASA分级)方面具有可比性。C组、N1组、N2组的心率、收缩压、舒张压、MAP、SPO2基础值、插管后、拔管后和PACU组相似且具有可比性。C、N1、N2组0 min时VAS评分具有可比性。5、10、15 min时,对照组VAS评分低于N1、N2组。对照组VAS平均评分在45 min后升高,N1组在75min后升高,N2组在90min后升高。C组PONV发病率高于N1、N2组。三组间PONV分级差异有统计学意义(P=0.093), C、N1、N2组呼吸抑制发生率比较。P值为0.0326,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomised control study comparing intravenous fentanyl vs nebulised fentanyl for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing elective breast surgeries under general anesthesia
Background: Relief of post operative pain with minimal side effects is a major goal during postanesthesia care. Intravenous fentanyl has been the gold standard for post operative pain relief. Fentanyl is a mu opioid receptor agonist characterised by high potency, rapid onset, short duration of action, lipid solubility and an apparent absence of serious side effects normally associated with opioids. Aim: To compare analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl for post operative pain relief in patients undergoing breast surgeries under general anesthesia. Objectives: 1. To assess the analgesic efficacy of nebulised fentanyl in comparison to IV fentanyl for post-operative pain relief after breast surgeries. 2. To study Incidence and severity of side effects of fentanyl such as sedation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, if any. Methodology: After our Hospital Research and Ethics Committee approval and obtaining informed written consent 90 patients aged between 20 and 65 years, belonging to ASA physical status I or II who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries under general anesthesia were included in this randomized control study. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 patients each to receive either Intravenous fentanyl 1mcg/kg (group C), or nebulised Fentanyl 2mcg/kg (Group N1) and nebulised Fentanyl 3mcg/kg (group N2). Results: These patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics age, sex, height, weight, ASA grading. Heart rates, SBP, DBP, MAP, SPO2 at basal value, after intubation, after extubation, and in PACU were similar and comparable in groups C, N1, N2. VAS scores were comparable at 0 min in groups C, N1, N2. At 5,10,15 min VAS scores were lower in control group than group N1 and N2. (P value The mean VAS scores increased in control group after 45 min where as in group N1 scores increased after 75min and in group N2 after 90min. The incidence of PONV was higher in group C compared to groups N1, N2. Statistically significant difference was observed between PONV grade among the three groups (P=0.093) Incidence of respiratory depression was compared in groups C,N1,N2. The P value is 0.0326 which is statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of sedation levels and adverse effects axillary brachial plexus block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine Efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation A comparative study of different types of video laryngoscopes in viewing ease and time of Intubation and laryngoscopic response A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia A comparative study of supreme laryngeal mask airway versus laryngeal tube undergoing general anesthesia in short surgical procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1