访问控制的正确性

G. Popek
{"title":"访问控制的正确性","authors":"G. Popek","doi":"10.1145/800192.805711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of approaches have been developed to modularize parts of multiuser computer systems so that access to each part can be controlled. The devices of rings and capabilities are two examples. However, today's systems are notably incomplete and subject to defeat by determined and clever users. A point of view is presented here which allows proving that a logical design of an access control system is correct relative to a designer-specified set of criteria. Implementation questions are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":72321,"journal":{"name":"ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies","volume":"12 1","pages":"236-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correctness in access control\",\"authors\":\"G. Popek\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800192.805711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of approaches have been developed to modularize parts of multiuser computer systems so that access to each part can be controlled. The devices of rings and capabilities are two examples. However, today's systems are notably incomplete and subject to defeat by determined and clever users. A point of view is presented here which allows proving that a logical design of an access control system is correct relative to a designer-specified set of criteria. Implementation questions are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"236-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1973-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800192.805711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800192.805711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

已经开发了许多方法来模块化多用户计算机系统的各个部分,以便可以控制对每个部分的访问。环和功能的设备就是两个例子。然而,今天的系统显然是不完整的,容易被坚定而聪明的用户打败。这里提出了一个观点,它允许证明访问控制系统的逻辑设计相对于设计者指定的一组标准是正确的。还讨论了实现问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correctness in access control
A number of approaches have been developed to modularize parts of multiuser computer systems so that access to each part can be controlled. The devices of rings and capabilities are two examples. However, today's systems are notably incomplete and subject to defeat by determined and clever users. A point of view is presented here which allows proving that a logical design of an access control system is correct relative to a designer-specified set of criteria. Implementation questions are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enabling Uniform Computer Interaction Experience for Blind Users through Large Language Models. Screen Magnification for Readers with Low Vision: A Study on Usability and Performance. Blind Users Accessing Their Training Images in Teachable Object Recognizers. Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis. Mobile Phone Use by People with Mild to Moderate Dementia: Uncovering Challenges and Identifying Opportunities: Mobile Phone Use by People with Mild to Moderate Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1