基于体裁的印尼语学习的科学途径与方法

Mahsun Mahsun, B. Wahidah, Muhammad Khairussibyani, Yenni Febtaria Wijayatiningsih
{"title":"基于体裁的印尼语学习的科学途径与方法","authors":"Mahsun Mahsun, B. Wahidah, Muhammad Khairussibyani, Yenni Febtaria Wijayatiningsih","doi":"10.33394/jk.v9i2.7404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the scientific approach and method of learning and show the results in genre-based Indonesian language learning. This study used a qualitative approach. The data were collected from three sources: literature review, student learning outcomes, and questionnaire results. Data on students’ learning outcomes and views were explicitly taken from two groups. The first group consisted of 113 respondents who were asked to construct literary texts. The second group consisted of 105 respondents who were asked to construct exposition texts. The library research data was analyzed using theoretical and conceptual analysis, while the students’ learning outcome data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed by quantitative analysis. Based on the analysis of the three forms of data, it was discovered that; (a) the terms scientific approach and method were relevant to genre-based (Indonesian) language learning, (b) scientific as a learning method (scientific method) could be used by teachers as a method in delivering learning material as well as by students to construct texts as a form of learning outcomes, (c) scientific method guides students to construct text systematically, in controlled, empirically, and analytically through scientific stages, and (d) there was a gap between the views of the students who think that the scientific method could guide students in constructing text and enhancing the quality of text production. With a score of 41.43, 91.15% of the students in the first group believed that the scientific approach might help students produce texts with high-quality output outcomes. 90% of the 105 respondents in the second group said that the scientific approach might help students create explanation texts even though the degree of text creation quality is low (score: 49.5). The students’ less expressive language use was to blame for this.","PeriodicalId":32441,"journal":{"name":"Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genre-Based Indonesian Language Learning Scientific Approach and Method\",\"authors\":\"Mahsun Mahsun, B. Wahidah, Muhammad Khairussibyani, Yenni Febtaria Wijayatiningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.33394/jk.v9i2.7404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the scientific approach and method of learning and show the results in genre-based Indonesian language learning. This study used a qualitative approach. The data were collected from three sources: literature review, student learning outcomes, and questionnaire results. Data on students’ learning outcomes and views were explicitly taken from two groups. The first group consisted of 113 respondents who were asked to construct literary texts. The second group consisted of 105 respondents who were asked to construct exposition texts. The library research data was analyzed using theoretical and conceptual analysis, while the students’ learning outcome data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed by quantitative analysis. Based on the analysis of the three forms of data, it was discovered that; (a) the terms scientific approach and method were relevant to genre-based (Indonesian) language learning, (b) scientific as a learning method (scientific method) could be used by teachers as a method in delivering learning material as well as by students to construct texts as a form of learning outcomes, (c) scientific method guides students to construct text systematically, in controlled, empirically, and analytically through scientific stages, and (d) there was a gap between the views of the students who think that the scientific method could guide students in constructing text and enhancing the quality of text production. With a score of 41.43, 91.15% of the students in the first group believed that the scientific approach might help students produce texts with high-quality output outcomes. 90% of the 105 respondents in the second group said that the scientific approach might help students create explanation texts even though the degree of text creation quality is low (score: 49.5). The students’ less expressive language use was to blame for this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析基于体裁的印尼语学习的科学方法和方法,并展示其结果。本研究采用定性方法。数据收集自三个来源:文献综述、学生学习成果和问卷调查结果。关于学生学习成果和观点的数据明确取自两组。第一组由113名被调查者组成,他们被要求构建文学文本。第二组由105名受访者组成,他们被要求构建说明性文本。图书馆研究数据采用理论分析和概念分析,学生学习成果数据采用定性和定量分析。对问卷数据进行定量分析。通过对三种数据形式的分析,发现;(a)术语科学方法和方法与基于体体语的(印尼语)语言学习相关,(b)科学作为一种学习方法(科学方法)可以被教师作为一种传授学习材料的方法,也可以被学生作为一种学习成果形式来构建文本,(c)科学方法引导学生通过科学阶段系统地、可控地、经验地和分析地构建文本,(d)学生认为科学方法可以指导学生构建文本,提高文本生产质量的观点存在差距。第一组学生的得分为41.43,91.15%的学生认为科学的方法可以帮助学生产生高质量输出结果的文本。第二组105名受访者中,有90%的人认为科学的方法可以帮助学生创建解释性文本,尽管文本创建质量的程度很低(得分:49.5)。学生们缺乏表达性的语言使用是造成这种情况的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genre-Based Indonesian Language Learning Scientific Approach and Method
This study aims to analyze the scientific approach and method of learning and show the results in genre-based Indonesian language learning. This study used a qualitative approach. The data were collected from three sources: literature review, student learning outcomes, and questionnaire results. Data on students’ learning outcomes and views were explicitly taken from two groups. The first group consisted of 113 respondents who were asked to construct literary texts. The second group consisted of 105 respondents who were asked to construct exposition texts. The library research data was analyzed using theoretical and conceptual analysis, while the students’ learning outcome data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed by quantitative analysis. Based on the analysis of the three forms of data, it was discovered that; (a) the terms scientific approach and method were relevant to genre-based (Indonesian) language learning, (b) scientific as a learning method (scientific method) could be used by teachers as a method in delivering learning material as well as by students to construct texts as a form of learning outcomes, (c) scientific method guides students to construct text systematically, in controlled, empirically, and analytically through scientific stages, and (d) there was a gap between the views of the students who think that the scientific method could guide students in constructing text and enhancing the quality of text production. With a score of 41.43, 91.15% of the students in the first group believed that the scientific approach might help students produce texts with high-quality output outcomes. 90% of the 105 respondents in the second group said that the scientific approach might help students create explanation texts even though the degree of text creation quality is low (score: 49.5). The students’ less expressive language use was to blame for this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scratch-Based Interactive Games to Increase Interest in Learning Mathematics for the Second Grade Elementary School Students Animated Video Media on Clean and Healthy Living Behavior in Elementary School The Positive Impact of Digital Literacy on Science Process Skills The Contribution of Learning Motivation and Parents’ Socio-Economy towards Students’ Learning Outcomes through Learning Independence The Effectiveness of Scratch Learning Media Using the PMRI Approach to Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1