俄罗斯版工作焦虑量表的翻译、认同与初步心理测量评价

N. Garanyan, A. Sharapova, M. Sorokova, O. Mikita, S. L. Boyko
{"title":"俄罗斯版工作焦虑量表的翻译、认同与初步心理测量评价","authors":"N. Garanyan, A. Sharapova, M. Sorokova, O. Mikita, S. L. Boyko","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2020280402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the results of approbation of the Russian-language version of the Job Anxiety Scale (JAS) by B. Mushalla and M. Linden, based on a differentiated clinical approach to anxiety states during work. The 70-item scale was translated into Russian and tested in a sample of 410 subjects, who were professionals in various fields. The exploratory factor analysis procedure identified a five-factor structure that was different from the original one. The factors were named as follows: 1) Discomfort, tension, and anxiety at work with the conviction of its harmfulness; 2) Social anxiety and avoidant behavior in the workplace; 3) Experiencing injustice and exploitation in the workplace; 4) Anxiety for the preservation of the workplace and the future; 5) Cognitions about one’s inefficiency. High reliability of the Russian version of JAS has been established. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the entire scale was 0.973; the Gutmann split-half coefficient was 0.945. There were multiple correlations between the JAS scores and the symptoms of mental disorders assessed by the SCL-90-R, which can be considered as evidence of the external validity of the scale.","PeriodicalId":43458,"journal":{"name":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, Approbation, and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Russian Version of the Job Anxiety Scale by B. Muschalla and M. Linden\",\"authors\":\"N. Garanyan, A. Sharapova, M. Sorokova, O. Mikita, S. L. Boyko\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/cpp.2020280402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents the results of approbation of the Russian-language version of the Job Anxiety Scale (JAS) by B. Mushalla and M. Linden, based on a differentiated clinical approach to anxiety states during work. The 70-item scale was translated into Russian and tested in a sample of 410 subjects, who were professionals in various fields. The exploratory factor analysis procedure identified a five-factor structure that was different from the original one. The factors were named as follows: 1) Discomfort, tension, and anxiety at work with the conviction of its harmfulness; 2) Social anxiety and avoidant behavior in the workplace; 3) Experiencing injustice and exploitation in the workplace; 4) Anxiety for the preservation of the workplace and the future; 5) Cognitions about one’s inefficiency. High reliability of the Russian version of JAS has been established. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the entire scale was 0.973; the Gutmann split-half coefficient was 0.945. There were multiple correlations between the JAS scores and the symptoms of mental disorders assessed by the SCL-90-R, which can be considered as evidence of the external validity of the scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"9-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了B. Mushalla和M. Linden基于工作焦虑状态的差异化临床方法对俄文版工作焦虑量表(JAS)的认可结果。这个70项的量表被翻译成俄语,在410名不同领域的专业人士中进行了测试。探索性因子分析程序确定了不同于原始结构的五因子结构。影响因素如下:1)工作中的不适、紧张和焦虑,并确信其有害;2)职场社交焦虑与回避行为;3)在工作场所遭受不公正和剥削;4)对保存工作场所和未来的焦虑;5)对自己效率低下的认知。俄罗斯版JAS的高可靠性已经建立。整个量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.973;Gutmann劈裂系数为0.945。JAS得分与SCL-90-R评定的精神障碍症状存在多重相关,可作为该量表外部效度的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation, Approbation, and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Russian Version of the Job Anxiety Scale by B. Muschalla and M. Linden
The paper presents the results of approbation of the Russian-language version of the Job Anxiety Scale (JAS) by B. Mushalla and M. Linden, based on a differentiated clinical approach to anxiety states during work. The 70-item scale was translated into Russian and tested in a sample of 410 subjects, who were professionals in various fields. The exploratory factor analysis procedure identified a five-factor structure that was different from the original one. The factors were named as follows: 1) Discomfort, tension, and anxiety at work with the conviction of its harmfulness; 2) Social anxiety and avoidant behavior in the workplace; 3) Experiencing injustice and exploitation in the workplace; 4) Anxiety for the preservation of the workplace and the future; 5) Cognitions about one’s inefficiency. High reliability of the Russian version of JAS has been established. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the entire scale was 0.973; the Gutmann split-half coefficient was 0.945. There were multiple correlations between the JAS scores and the symptoms of mental disorders assessed by the SCL-90-R, which can be considered as evidence of the external validity of the scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Psychotherapy - Integrating the Experience of an Emergency Current State of Research on the Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Processing (EMDR) in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Traumatic Stress and Its Specificity in Life-Threatening Disease Stress of Invisible Information Threats and its Consequences Psychological Assumptions and Early Maladaptive Schemas in People with Traumatic Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1