使用几乎无处不在的定理从分析研究随机性

IF 0.7 3区 数学 Q1 LOGIC Bulletin of Symbolic Logic Pub Date : 2014-11-03 DOI:10.1017/BSL.2016.10
Kenshi Miyabe, A. Nies, Jing Zhang
{"title":"使用几乎无处不在的定理从分析研究随机性","authors":"Kenshi Miyabe, A. Nies, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1017/BSL.2016.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study algorithmic randomness notions via effective versions of almost-everywhere theorems from analysis and ergodic theory. The effectivization is in terms of objects described by a computably enumerable set, such as lower semicomputable functions. The corresponding randomness notions are slightly stronger than \\ML\\ (ML) randomness. We establish several equivalences. Given a ML-random real $z$, the additional randomness strengths needed for the following are equivalent. \n\\n (1) all effectively closed classes containing $z$ have density $1$ at $z$. \n\\n (2) all nondecreasing functions with uniformly left-c.e.\\ increments are differentiable at $z$. \n\\n (3) $z$ is a Lebesgue point of each lower semicomputable integrable function. \nWe also consider convergence of left-c.e.\\ martingales, and convergence in the sense of Birkhoff's pointwise ergodic theorem. Lastly we study randomness notions for density of $\\Pi^0_n$ and $\\Sigma^1_1$ classes.","PeriodicalId":55307,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"100 1","pages":"305-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Almost-everywhere theorems from Analysis to Study Randomness\",\"authors\":\"Kenshi Miyabe, A. Nies, Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/BSL.2016.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study algorithmic randomness notions via effective versions of almost-everywhere theorems from analysis and ergodic theory. The effectivization is in terms of objects described by a computably enumerable set, such as lower semicomputable functions. The corresponding randomness notions are slightly stronger than \\\\ML\\\\ (ML) randomness. We establish several equivalences. Given a ML-random real $z$, the additional randomness strengths needed for the following are equivalent. \\n\\\\n (1) all effectively closed classes containing $z$ have density $1$ at $z$. \\n\\\\n (2) all nondecreasing functions with uniformly left-c.e.\\\\ increments are differentiable at $z$. \\n\\\\n (3) $z$ is a Lebesgue point of each lower semicomputable integrable function. \\nWe also consider convergence of left-c.e.\\\\ martingales, and convergence in the sense of Birkhoff's pointwise ergodic theorem. Lastly we study randomness notions for density of $\\\\Pi^0_n$ and $\\\\Sigma^1_1$ classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"305-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/BSL.2016.10\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BSL.2016.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

我们通过分析和遍历理论中几乎无处不在的定理的有效版本来研究算法随机性概念。效率是通过可计算枚举集描述的对象来实现的,例如低级半可计算函数。相应的随机性概念略强于\ML (ML)随机性。我们建立了几个等价。给定一个ml随机实数$z$,下面需要的额外随机性强度是相等的。\n(1)所有包含$z$的有效封闭类的密度$1$为$z$。\n(2)一致左-c.e.的所有非降函数。增量在$z$上是可微的。\n (3) $z$是每一个下半可计算可积函数的勒贝格点。我们还考虑了左-c - e的收敛性。以及Birkhoff的逐点遍历定理意义上的收敛性。最后研究了$\Pi^0_n$和$\Sigma^1_1$类密度的随机性概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Almost-everywhere theorems from Analysis to Study Randomness
We study algorithmic randomness notions via effective versions of almost-everywhere theorems from analysis and ergodic theory. The effectivization is in terms of objects described by a computably enumerable set, such as lower semicomputable functions. The corresponding randomness notions are slightly stronger than \ML\ (ML) randomness. We establish several equivalences. Given a ML-random real $z$, the additional randomness strengths needed for the following are equivalent. \n (1) all effectively closed classes containing $z$ have density $1$ at $z$. \n (2) all nondecreasing functions with uniformly left-c.e.\ increments are differentiable at $z$. \n (3) $z$ is a Lebesgue point of each lower semicomputable integrable function. We also consider convergence of left-c.e.\ martingales, and convergence in the sense of Birkhoff's pointwise ergodic theorem. Lastly we study randomness notions for density of $\Pi^0_n$ and $\Sigma^1_1$ classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic was established in 1995 by the Association for Symbolic Logic to provide a journal of high standards that would be both accessible and of interest to as wide an audience as possible. It is designed to cover all areas within the purview of the ASL: mathematical logic and its applications, philosophical and non-classical logic and its applications, history and philosophy of logic, and philosophy and methodology of mathematics.
期刊最新文献
Formal Logic of Sentences, Sentential Logic (also called Sentential Logic and Statement Logic) Semantic Models for ∏: ∏⧉ Basics of Set Theory Concepts of Deductive Reasoning Proof-Theoretical System for Predicate Logic: ∏πφ=
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1