绘制和使用自由体图:为什么不分解力可能更好?

I. Aviani, N. Erceg, V. Mešić
{"title":"绘制和使用自由体图:为什么不分解力可能更好?","authors":"I. Aviani, N. Erceg, V. Mešić","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVSTPER.11.020137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we investigated how two different approaches to drawing free body diagrams influence the development of students' understanding of Newton's laws including their ability to identify real forces. For this purpose we developed a 12- item two-tier multiple choice survey and conducted a quasi-experiment. This experiment included two groups of first-year physics students from Rijeka (RG) and Split (SG) University. Students from both groups solved mechanics problems for a period of two class hours. The only difference was that RG students used the superposition of forces approach to solving mechanics problems and in SG the decomposition of forces approach has been used. The ANCOVA showed a statistically significant difference in favour of RG, whereby the effect sizes were moderate to large, and largest differences have been observed in the ability of identifying real forces. Students from the control group (SG) more often exhibited the misconception that forces and their components act on a body independently and simultaneously. Our results support the idea that the practice of resolving forces into components may not be the most effective way to develop understanding of Newton's laws and the concept of force.","PeriodicalId":49697,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research","volume":"88 1","pages":"020137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces?\",\"authors\":\"I. Aviani, N. Erceg, V. Mešić\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PHYSREVSTPER.11.020137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study we investigated how two different approaches to drawing free body diagrams influence the development of students' understanding of Newton's laws including their ability to identify real forces. For this purpose we developed a 12- item two-tier multiple choice survey and conducted a quasi-experiment. This experiment included two groups of first-year physics students from Rijeka (RG) and Split (SG) University. Students from both groups solved mechanics problems for a period of two class hours. The only difference was that RG students used the superposition of forces approach to solving mechanics problems and in SG the decomposition of forces approach has been used. The ANCOVA showed a statistically significant difference in favour of RG, whereby the effect sizes were moderate to large, and largest differences have been observed in the ability of identifying real forces. Students from the control group (SG) more often exhibited the misconception that forces and their components act on a body independently and simultaneously. Our results support the idea that the practice of resolving forces into components may not be the most effective way to develop understanding of Newton's laws and the concept of force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"020137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVSTPER.11.020137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVSTPER.11.020137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在这项研究中,我们调查了绘制自由体图的两种不同方法如何影响学生对牛顿定律的理解,包括他们识别真实力的能力。为此,我们开发了一个12项的双层选择调查,并进行了一个准实验。这项实验包括两组来自里耶卡大学和斯普利特大学的一年级物理学生。两组学生用两个学时的时间解决力学问题。唯一的区别是,RG学生使用力的叠加方法来解决力学问题,而在SG中使用了力的分解方法。ANCOVA显示了统计学上显著的差异,有利于RG,由此效应大小从中等到大,最大的差异已经观察到在识别真实力量的能力。控制组(SG)的学生更多地表现出力及其组成部分独立地同时作用于物体的误解。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即将力分解成分量的做法可能不是发展对牛顿定律和力概念理解的最有效方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces?
In this study we investigated how two different approaches to drawing free body diagrams influence the development of students' understanding of Newton's laws including their ability to identify real forces. For this purpose we developed a 12- item two-tier multiple choice survey and conducted a quasi-experiment. This experiment included two groups of first-year physics students from Rijeka (RG) and Split (SG) University. Students from both groups solved mechanics problems for a period of two class hours. The only difference was that RG students used the superposition of forces approach to solving mechanics problems and in SG the decomposition of forces approach has been used. The ANCOVA showed a statistically significant difference in favour of RG, whereby the effect sizes were moderate to large, and largest differences have been observed in the ability of identifying real forces. Students from the control group (SG) more often exhibited the misconception that forces and their components act on a body independently and simultaneously. Our results support the idea that the practice of resolving forces into components may not be the most effective way to develop understanding of Newton's laws and the concept of force.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research (PRST-PER) is a peer reviewed electronic-only journal sponsored by The American Physical Society (APS), the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) and the APS Forum on Education. The journal covers the full range of experimental and theoretical research on the teaching and/or learning of physics. PRST-PER is distributed without charge and financed by publication charges to the authors or to the authors" institutions. The criteria for acceptance of articles include the high scholarly and technical standards of our other Physical Review journals.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions and Suggestions for the Desirable Operation of the High School Credit System in Special Schools A Study of Special Education Teachers’ Experiences on Software Education for Students with Disabilities Present and Future of Inclusive Education in Korean Kindergartens: A Qualitative Inquiry on Experiences and Perceptions of Teachers and Administrators Installation Status and Support Needs of Facilities for the Disabled in Inclusive Child Care and Education Centers via Child Care and Education Teachers and Special Education Teachers A Grounded Theoretical Approach of Individualized Counseling Planning Process of Professional Counseling Teachers for Special Child Counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1