尾侧硬膜外联合全身麻醉用于腰椎间盘切除术

S. Hady, Azza Youssef Ibrahim Ahmed, Hatem Saaed Abdel Hamid Neamat-Allah, Milad Ragaay Zekri Basta, Sanaa Mohamed Mohamed El Fawal
{"title":"尾侧硬膜外联合全身麻醉用于腰椎间盘切除术","authors":"S. Hady, Azza Youssef Ibrahim Ahmed, Hatem Saaed Abdel Hamid Neamat-Allah, Milad Ragaay Zekri Basta, Sanaa Mohamed Mohamed El Fawal","doi":"10.21608/asmj.2022.270250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Lumbar Discectomy can be effectively performed using various anesthetic techniques. General anesthesia is more frequently used for these surgeries, though regional anesthesia when combined with general anesthesia is proven to be safe in few studies. Aim of the Work: To compare the intra operative and short term post-operative outcome variable in patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy under combined caudal epidural with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone. Patients and Methods: This study included 100 patients aging 25 – 40 years old, admitted to operating room in Ain Shams University hospitals for single-level lumbar discectomy. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 each: Group A received general anesthesia, Group B, in addition to GA, received caudal epidural using 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal region. Results: Intra operative HR, MAP, narcotic consumption, blood loss were lower in the Caudal Epidural with GA group. Postoperative 1 st analgesia needed was less in the GA group. Postoperative VAS score and PONV were higher in the GA group when compared to combined caudal epidural with GA. There was no motor affection in both groups and sensory affection was with a median at T10 in the group receiving Caudal epidural with GA. Conclusion: Epidural caudal anesthesia can safely be combined with GA for single leveled lumbar discectomy. It reduces intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative IV analgesic requirements and PONV.","PeriodicalId":7450,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMBINED CAUDAL EPIDURAL WITH GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR LUMBAR DISCECTOMY\",\"authors\":\"S. Hady, Azza Youssef Ibrahim Ahmed, Hatem Saaed Abdel Hamid Neamat-Allah, Milad Ragaay Zekri Basta, Sanaa Mohamed Mohamed El Fawal\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asmj.2022.270250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: Lumbar Discectomy can be effectively performed using various anesthetic techniques. General anesthesia is more frequently used for these surgeries, though regional anesthesia when combined with general anesthesia is proven to be safe in few studies. Aim of the Work: To compare the intra operative and short term post-operative outcome variable in patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy under combined caudal epidural with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone. Patients and Methods: This study included 100 patients aging 25 – 40 years old, admitted to operating room in Ain Shams University hospitals for single-level lumbar discectomy. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 each: Group A received general anesthesia, Group B, in addition to GA, received caudal epidural using 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal region. Results: Intra operative HR, MAP, narcotic consumption, blood loss were lower in the Caudal Epidural with GA group. Postoperative 1 st analgesia needed was less in the GA group. Postoperative VAS score and PONV were higher in the GA group when compared to combined caudal epidural with GA. There was no motor affection in both groups and sensory affection was with a median at T10 in the group receiving Caudal epidural with GA. Conclusion: Epidural caudal anesthesia can safely be combined with GA for single leveled lumbar discectomy. It reduces intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative IV analgesic requirements and PONV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2022.270250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2022.270250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用多种麻醉技术可以有效地进行腰椎间盘切除术。全身麻醉更常用于这些手术,尽管区域麻醉与全身麻醉联合使用在少数研究中被证明是安全的。研究目的:比较尾侧硬膜外联合全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉下行原发性单节段腰椎间盘切除术患者术中及术后短期预后变量。患者和方法:本研究纳入100例年龄在25 - 40岁的患者,在艾因沙姆斯大学医院的手术室接受单节段腰椎间盘切除术。将患者分为两组,每组50例:A组全麻,B组在GA的基础上,尾侧硬膜外注射0.25%布比卡因20 ml。结果:尾侧硬膜外加GA组术中HR、MAP、麻醉消耗、出血量均较低。GA组术后第1次镇痛需要较少。与尾侧硬膜外加GA组相比,GA组术后VAS评分和PONV均较高。两组均无运动情感,经尾侧硬膜外加GA组感觉情感中位数为T10。结论:硬膜外麻醉与GA联合应用于单节段腰椎间盘切除术是安全的。减少术中心动过速和高血压、出血量、术中和术后静脉镇痛需求和PONV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMBINED CAUDAL EPIDURAL WITH GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR LUMBAR DISCECTOMY
: Background: Lumbar Discectomy can be effectively performed using various anesthetic techniques. General anesthesia is more frequently used for these surgeries, though regional anesthesia when combined with general anesthesia is proven to be safe in few studies. Aim of the Work: To compare the intra operative and short term post-operative outcome variable in patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy under combined caudal epidural with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone. Patients and Methods: This study included 100 patients aging 25 – 40 years old, admitted to operating room in Ain Shams University hospitals for single-level lumbar discectomy. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 each: Group A received general anesthesia, Group B, in addition to GA, received caudal epidural using 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal region. Results: Intra operative HR, MAP, narcotic consumption, blood loss were lower in the Caudal Epidural with GA group. Postoperative 1 st analgesia needed was less in the GA group. Postoperative VAS score and PONV were higher in the GA group when compared to combined caudal epidural with GA. There was no motor affection in both groups and sensory affection was with a median at T10 in the group receiving Caudal epidural with GA. Conclusion: Epidural caudal anesthesia can safely be combined with GA for single leveled lumbar discectomy. It reduces intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative IV analgesic requirements and PONV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serum Erythroferrone, a Biomarker of Erythropoietic Activity in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Fibromyalgia and Depression in Egyptian Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study of Impact on Physical Functional Status Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) – A Review Prevalence and Factors Associated with Medication non-adherence among diabetic patients Attending at Menoufia University Hospitals Proportion and Determinants of Fibromyalgia in a Sample of Egyptians with Higher Education (Physicians and Non-physicians): A Comparative Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1