陆地食物网模型对土壤清理水平的评价

P. Doctor, K. A. Gano, N. K. Lane
{"title":"陆地食物网模型对土壤清理水平的评价","authors":"P. Doctor, K. A. Gano, N. K. Lane","doi":"10.1520/STP14416S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) is revising the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA: WAC 173-340-7490 to 7494) to include terrestrial food pathways in an ecological risk evaluation and to set cleanup levels. One of the key provisions of the ecological risk assessment approach proposed by Ecology is a generic simplified \"foodweb\" model that would be used to set cleanup levels. The terrestrial model is based on four feeding guilds and default species are the earthworm, shrew, vole, and robin. The use of a foodweb model implies that the results should in some way be descriptive of the ecosystem being evaluated. Any decision criterion (e.g., a benchmark or cleanup level) should be site-specific, and based on species present at the site. The default species are not representative of the fauna in the native shrub-steppe ecosystem of the Hanford Site. Therefore, the use of species not present at the site to set soil cleanup levels seems flawed. Alternative species for the four feeding guilds have been selected. Species specific exposure parameters were developed from the literature.","PeriodicalId":8583,"journal":{"name":"ASTM special technical publications","volume":"1 1","pages":"89-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Terrestrial Foodweb Model to Set Soil Cleanup Levels\",\"authors\":\"P. Doctor, K. A. Gano, N. K. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/STP14416S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) is revising the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA: WAC 173-340-7490 to 7494) to include terrestrial food pathways in an ecological risk evaluation and to set cleanup levels. One of the key provisions of the ecological risk assessment approach proposed by Ecology is a generic simplified \\\"foodweb\\\" model that would be used to set cleanup levels. The terrestrial model is based on four feeding guilds and default species are the earthworm, shrew, vole, and robin. The use of a foodweb model implies that the results should in some way be descriptive of the ecosystem being evaluated. Any decision criterion (e.g., a benchmark or cleanup level) should be site-specific, and based on species present at the site. The default species are not representative of the fauna in the native shrub-steppe ecosystem of the Hanford Site. Therefore, the use of species not present at the site to set soil cleanup levels seems flawed. Alternative species for the four feeding guilds have been selected. Species specific exposure parameters were developed from the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASTM special technical publications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"89-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASTM special technical publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP14416S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASTM special technical publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP14416S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

华盛顿州生态部(Ecology)正在修订《有毒物质控制模型法案》(MTCA: WAC 173-340-7490至7494),将陆地食物途径纳入生态风险评估,并设定清理水平。《生态学》提出的生态风险评估方法的关键条款之一是一个通用的简化“食物网”模型,该模型将用于设定清理水平。陆地模型基于四种食性行会,默认物种是蚯蚓、鼩鼱、田鼠和知更鸟。食物网模型的使用意味着结果应该在某种程度上描述被评估的生态系统。任何决策标准(例如,基准或清理水平)都应针对具体地点,并以该地点存在的物种为基础。默认物种不能代表汉福德遗址区原生灌木-草原生态系统的动物群。因此,使用现场不存在的物种来设定土壤净化水平似乎是有缺陷的。四个喂养行会的备选物种已经选定。根据文献建立了物种特定暴露参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Terrestrial Foodweb Model to Set Soil Cleanup Levels
The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) is revising the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA: WAC 173-340-7490 to 7494) to include terrestrial food pathways in an ecological risk evaluation and to set cleanup levels. One of the key provisions of the ecological risk assessment approach proposed by Ecology is a generic simplified "foodweb" model that would be used to set cleanup levels. The terrestrial model is based on four feeding guilds and default species are the earthworm, shrew, vole, and robin. The use of a foodweb model implies that the results should in some way be descriptive of the ecosystem being evaluated. Any decision criterion (e.g., a benchmark or cleanup level) should be site-specific, and based on species present at the site. The default species are not representative of the fauna in the native shrub-steppe ecosystem of the Hanford Site. Therefore, the use of species not present at the site to set soil cleanup levels seems flawed. Alternative species for the four feeding guilds have been selected. Species specific exposure parameters were developed from the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transmission Electron Microscopy Examinations of Metal-Oxide Interface of Zirconium-Based Alloys Irradiated in Halden Reactor-IFA-638 Translation of International Snow-Sports Equipment Standards into Injury-Prevention Practice Evaluation of Ski-Binding-Boot System Safety Using Torque Testing Influence of Sn on Deformation Mechanisms During Room Temperature Compression of Binary Zr–Sn Alloys Life Prediction Tool for Ceramic Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1