{"title":"世俗的需要:当代印度的伊斯兰法律与国家治理","authors":"R. Rao","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2039489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The book under review argues that Indian secularism does not and cannot work without the assistance of non-state Islamic legal actors. It contends that this dependence engenders an ambivalent politics of need and antipathy on the part of Indian secularism vis-à-vis Muslims. This review article summarises the book’s key claims. It then explores what it means for gender to be a central terrain on which the authority of non-state Islamic legal institutions is asserted and contested. The article takes issue with the book’s suggestion that the Supreme Court has distanced itself from the non-state Islamic arena in some ways, finding more illuminating its demonstration of the many ways in which the secular state remains dependent on and entangled with the Islamic non-state. In conclusion, it speculates on the differences and overlaps between secular judicial antipathy towards Muslims and the more overt expressions of such hatred emanating from the Hindu Right.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Secular Need: Islamic Law and State Governance in Contemporary India\",\"authors\":\"R. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2022.2039489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The book under review argues that Indian secularism does not and cannot work without the assistance of non-state Islamic legal actors. It contends that this dependence engenders an ambivalent politics of need and antipathy on the part of Indian secularism vis-à-vis Muslims. This review article summarises the book’s key claims. It then explores what it means for gender to be a central terrain on which the authority of non-state Islamic legal institutions is asserted and contested. The article takes issue with the book’s suggestion that the Supreme Court has distanced itself from the non-state Islamic arena in some ways, finding more illuminating its demonstration of the many ways in which the secular state remains dependent on and entangled with the Islamic non-state. In conclusion, it speculates on the differences and overlaps between secular judicial antipathy towards Muslims and the more overt expressions of such hatred emanating from the Hindu Right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2039489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2039489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Secular Need: Islamic Law and State Governance in Contemporary India
ABSTRACT The book under review argues that Indian secularism does not and cannot work without the assistance of non-state Islamic legal actors. It contends that this dependence engenders an ambivalent politics of need and antipathy on the part of Indian secularism vis-à-vis Muslims. This review article summarises the book’s key claims. It then explores what it means for gender to be a central terrain on which the authority of non-state Islamic legal institutions is asserted and contested. The article takes issue with the book’s suggestion that the Supreme Court has distanced itself from the non-state Islamic arena in some ways, finding more illuminating its demonstration of the many ways in which the secular state remains dependent on and entangled with the Islamic non-state. In conclusion, it speculates on the differences and overlaps between secular judicial antipathy towards Muslims and the more overt expressions of such hatred emanating from the Hindu Right.