Meta分析:健康信念模型在2型糖尿病三级预防中的应用

Etanaulia Marsim, Fara Aristya Prisma, Herawati Prianggi
{"title":"Meta分析:健康信念模型在2型糖尿病三级预防中的应用","authors":"Etanaulia Marsim, Fara Aristya Prisma, Herawati Prianggi","doi":"10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 is a hyperglycemic disease due to insensitivity of cells to insulin. Insulin levels may decrease slightly or be in the normal range. The level of adherence of type 2 diabetes patients is lower than type 1 diabetes. Compliance with medication and taking medication in DM patients has a very important role in controlling blood sugar levels. HBM is a model that describes a person's knowledge of health threats and understanding of recommended behaviors to prevent or treat health problems based on an assessment of feasibility and benefits compared to costs. This study aimed to estimate the effect of HBM, especially the severity and selfefficacy constructs. Subjects and Method: This study was conducted using a systematic review and meta-analysis study design using PICO. Population: type-2 diabetic patients. Intervention: high severity perception and high self-efficacy. Comparison: low severity perception, and low self-efficacy. Outcome: tertiary prevention behaviors. The articles used in this study came from 4 databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct and Proquest. The article keywords are “health belief model” OR “perceived severity” OR “self-efficacy” AND “type 2 diabetes”. The articles included in this study are full paper articles, cross-sectional study designs, 2012-2021 and the size of the relationship between Adj Odds Ratio. Article selection is done using PRISMA. Articles were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application. Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies were reviewed in this study. A meta-analysis of 7 cross-sectional studies showed that strong perceived severity increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 4.69 times (aOR= 4.69; 95% CI= 1.92 to 11.47; p= 0.007). A meta-analysis of 9 cross-sectional studies showed that slightly stronger perceived self-efficacy increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 1.68 times (aOR= 1.68; 95% CI= 1.03 to 2.74; p= 0.040). Conclusion: Severity perception and self-efficacy are predictors for tertiary prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","PeriodicalId":16038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","volume":"196 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta Analysis: Application of Health Belief Model on the Tertiary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Etanaulia Marsim, Fara Aristya Prisma, Herawati Prianggi\",\"doi\":\"10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 is a hyperglycemic disease due to insensitivity of cells to insulin. Insulin levels may decrease slightly or be in the normal range. The level of adherence of type 2 diabetes patients is lower than type 1 diabetes. Compliance with medication and taking medication in DM patients has a very important role in controlling blood sugar levels. HBM is a model that describes a person's knowledge of health threats and understanding of recommended behaviors to prevent or treat health problems based on an assessment of feasibility and benefits compared to costs. This study aimed to estimate the effect of HBM, especially the severity and selfefficacy constructs. Subjects and Method: This study was conducted using a systematic review and meta-analysis study design using PICO. Population: type-2 diabetic patients. Intervention: high severity perception and high self-efficacy. Comparison: low severity perception, and low self-efficacy. Outcome: tertiary prevention behaviors. The articles used in this study came from 4 databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct and Proquest. The article keywords are “health belief model” OR “perceived severity” OR “self-efficacy” AND “type 2 diabetes”. The articles included in this study are full paper articles, cross-sectional study designs, 2012-2021 and the size of the relationship between Adj Odds Ratio. Article selection is done using PRISMA. Articles were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application. Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies were reviewed in this study. A meta-analysis of 7 cross-sectional studies showed that strong perceived severity increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 4.69 times (aOR= 4.69; 95% CI= 1.92 to 11.47; p= 0.007). A meta-analysis of 9 cross-sectional studies showed that slightly stronger perceived self-efficacy increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 1.68 times (aOR= 1.68; 95% CI= 1.03 to 2.74; p= 0.040). Conclusion: Severity perception and self-efficacy are predictors for tertiary prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"196 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2021.06.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病是一种由细胞对胰岛素不敏感引起的高血糖疾病。胰岛素水平可能会轻微下降或在正常范围内。2型糖尿病患者的依从性水平低于1型糖尿病患者。糖尿病患者的服药依从性和服药对控制血糖水平具有非常重要的作用。HBM是一个模型,它描述了一个人对健康威胁的知识和对预防或治疗健康问题的建议行为的理解,其基础是对可行性和收益与成本的比较评估。本研究旨在评估HBM的影响,特别是严重程度和自我效能结构。研究对象和方法:本研究采用PICO系统评价和荟萃分析研究设计。人群:2型糖尿病患者。干预:高严重性知觉和高自我效能。比较:严重性知觉低,自我效能低。结果:三级预防行为。本研究使用的文章来自Google Scholar、Pubmed、Science Direct和Proquest 4个数据库。文章关键词是“健康信念模型”或“感知严重性”或“自我效能”和“2型糖尿病”。本研究纳入的文章均为论文全文、横断面研究设计、2012-2021与Adj优势比的大小关系。文章选择使用PRISMA完成。文章使用Review Manager 5.3应用程序进行分析。结果:本研究共回顾了12项横断面研究。一项针对7项横断面研究的meta分析显示,强烈的感知严重性使2型糖尿病患者实施三级预防行为的可能性增加了4.69倍(aOR= 4.69;95% CI= 1.92 ~ 11.47;p = 0.007)。对9项横断面研究的meta分析显示,自我效能感稍强,可使2型糖尿病患者实施三级预防行为的可能性增加1.68倍(aOR= 1.68;95% CI= 1.03 ~ 2.74;p = 0.040)。结论:严重性感知和自我效能感是2型糖尿病三级预防的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta Analysis: Application of Health Belief Model on the Tertiary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Background: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 is a hyperglycemic disease due to insensitivity of cells to insulin. Insulin levels may decrease slightly or be in the normal range. The level of adherence of type 2 diabetes patients is lower than type 1 diabetes. Compliance with medication and taking medication in DM patients has a very important role in controlling blood sugar levels. HBM is a model that describes a person's knowledge of health threats and understanding of recommended behaviors to prevent or treat health problems based on an assessment of feasibility and benefits compared to costs. This study aimed to estimate the effect of HBM, especially the severity and selfefficacy constructs. Subjects and Method: This study was conducted using a systematic review and meta-analysis study design using PICO. Population: type-2 diabetic patients. Intervention: high severity perception and high self-efficacy. Comparison: low severity perception, and low self-efficacy. Outcome: tertiary prevention behaviors. The articles used in this study came from 4 databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct and Proquest. The article keywords are “health belief model” OR “perceived severity” OR “self-efficacy” AND “type 2 diabetes”. The articles included in this study are full paper articles, cross-sectional study designs, 2012-2021 and the size of the relationship between Adj Odds Ratio. Article selection is done using PRISMA. Articles were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 application. Results: A total of 12 cross-sectional studies were reviewed in this study. A meta-analysis of 7 cross-sectional studies showed that strong perceived severity increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 4.69 times (aOR= 4.69; 95% CI= 1.92 to 11.47; p= 0.007). A meta-analysis of 9 cross-sectional studies showed that slightly stronger perceived self-efficacy increased the likelihood of implementing tertiary prevention behaviors in type 2 diabetes patients by 1.68 times (aOR= 1.68; 95% CI= 1.03 to 2.74; p= 0.040). Conclusion: Severity perception and self-efficacy are predictors for tertiary prevention of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Pneumonia in Children Under Five in Tarus, Central Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara Parental Role, Social Media, Peer Support, and Their Associations on Attitude Toward Reproductive Health in Female Students in Junior High Schools, Manokwari, West Papua Comparison of the Effectiveness of Audio and VisualAudio as Health Promotion Media for Prevention of COVID-19 Transmission The Effect of Clitoria Ternatea's Drink on Insomnia in Post COVID-19 Patients The Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Text Messages on the Adherence to Antiretroviral Drug Taking in Patients Living with HIV/AIDS: A Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1