校园危机:学生获得医疗保健

B. Liang
{"title":"校园危机:学生获得医疗保健","authors":"B. Liang","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.43.3.crisis","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College-aged adults are an overrepresented group in the uninsured population of the United States, and traditionally underserved minorities are disproportionately affected. Students with private health insurance are often functionally uninsured as well, since most schools refuse to accept this traditionally elite calling card on campus. Consequently, the large uninsured and functionally uninsured populations often rely on school-sponsored health insurance plans for access to care. These plans have uneven coverage, limited benefits, exclusions and high co-pays and deductibles, and provide little health care security for their beneficiaries. Further, schools and insurance companies have profited substantially from these student plans, raising the possibility of a conflict of interest, with school-sponsored plans that may be focused on financial benefits to schools rather than the health of students. In addition, these plans may violate public policy and consumer protection laws by charging those who do not enroll in school-sponsored plans higher prices and by disingenuously claiming \"competitive\" rates when advertising to students. Public efforts at a student mandate, such as in Massachusetts, although successful in increasing the number of students with health insurance, have failed to provide adequate access to care. A focused policy must be put into place to ensure that students can effectively and efficiently access needed health care services on campus. In support of this effort, a proposed statute is provided herein. This bill would amend the Higher Education Opportunity Act to create a student health insurance mandate. School-sponsored plans, as well as private plans with comparable coverage, would be required to fulfill a minimum standard benefits plan. Reasonable exclusions and limitations would be allowed, based on standard practices in commercial health insurance plans. The statute would require a minimum percentage of premiums to be spent on health care, with any excess rebated to students. It would also require schools to accept a student's private health insurance for campus services to avoid forcing students to pay more than once for care. As part of this mandate, a portion of the surplus retained by schools billing private insurers would be allocated to create health insurance scholarships for uninsured students. Finally, the definition of \"cost of attendance\" would be adjusted to ensure that financial aid calculations take into account health insurance premiums.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crisis on Campus: Student Access to Health Care\",\"authors\":\"B. Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.36646/mjlr.43.3.crisis\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"College-aged adults are an overrepresented group in the uninsured population of the United States, and traditionally underserved minorities are disproportionately affected. Students with private health insurance are often functionally uninsured as well, since most schools refuse to accept this traditionally elite calling card on campus. Consequently, the large uninsured and functionally uninsured populations often rely on school-sponsored health insurance plans for access to care. These plans have uneven coverage, limited benefits, exclusions and high co-pays and deductibles, and provide little health care security for their beneficiaries. Further, schools and insurance companies have profited substantially from these student plans, raising the possibility of a conflict of interest, with school-sponsored plans that may be focused on financial benefits to schools rather than the health of students. In addition, these plans may violate public policy and consumer protection laws by charging those who do not enroll in school-sponsored plans higher prices and by disingenuously claiming \\\"competitive\\\" rates when advertising to students. Public efforts at a student mandate, such as in Massachusetts, although successful in increasing the number of students with health insurance, have failed to provide adequate access to care. A focused policy must be put into place to ensure that students can effectively and efficiently access needed health care services on campus. In support of this effort, a proposed statute is provided herein. This bill would amend the Higher Education Opportunity Act to create a student health insurance mandate. School-sponsored plans, as well as private plans with comparable coverage, would be required to fulfill a minimum standard benefits plan. Reasonable exclusions and limitations would be allowed, based on standard practices in commercial health insurance plans. The statute would require a minimum percentage of premiums to be spent on health care, with any excess rebated to students. It would also require schools to accept a student's private health insurance for campus services to avoid forcing students to pay more than once for care. As part of this mandate, a portion of the surplus retained by schools billing private insurers would be allocated to create health insurance scholarships for uninsured students. Finally, the definition of \\\"cost of attendance\\\" would be adjusted to ensure that financial aid calculations take into account health insurance premiums.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.43.3.crisis\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.43.3.crisis","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在美国没有保险的人口中,大学年龄的成年人是一个代表性过高的群体,而传统上得不到服务的少数族裔受到的影响尤为严重。拥有私人医疗保险的学生通常在功能上也没有保险,因为大多数学校拒绝接受这种传统上的精英校园名片。因此,大量没有保险和功能上没有保险的人口往往依靠学校赞助的健康保险计划来获得护理。这些计划覆盖范围不均衡,福利有限,排除在外,共同支付和免赔额高,并为受益人提供很少的卫生保健保障。此外,学校和保险公司从这些学生计划中获得了大量利润,增加了利益冲突的可能性,因为学校赞助的计划可能侧重于学校的经济利益,而不是学生的健康。此外,这些计划可能违反公共政策和消费者保护法,向那些没有参加学校赞助计划的人收取更高的价格,并在向学生做广告时虚伪地声称“有竞争力”的价格。在学生授权方面的公共努力,例如在马萨诸塞州,虽然成功地增加了拥有健康保险的学生人数,但未能提供充分的保健机会。必须制定一项重点政策,以确保学生能够有效和高效地在校园内获得所需的医疗保健服务。为支持这一努力,兹提出一项规约草案。该法案将修改《高等教育机会法案》,以建立学生健康保险授权。学校赞助的保险计划,以及覆盖范围相当的私人保险计划,都需要满足最低标准福利计划。根据商业健康保险计划的标准做法,允许合理的排除和限制。该法规将要求医疗保健费用的最低比例,任何超额部分都退还给学生。它还要求学校接受学生的私人医疗保险,以支付校园服务,以避免强迫学生多次支付医疗费用。作为这项任务的一部分,向私营保险公司收费的学校保留的部分盈余将用于为未投保的学生设立健康保险奖学金。最后,将调整"就读费用"的定义,以确保财政援助的计算考虑到健康保险费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crisis on Campus: Student Access to Health Care
College-aged adults are an overrepresented group in the uninsured population of the United States, and traditionally underserved minorities are disproportionately affected. Students with private health insurance are often functionally uninsured as well, since most schools refuse to accept this traditionally elite calling card on campus. Consequently, the large uninsured and functionally uninsured populations often rely on school-sponsored health insurance plans for access to care. These plans have uneven coverage, limited benefits, exclusions and high co-pays and deductibles, and provide little health care security for their beneficiaries. Further, schools and insurance companies have profited substantially from these student plans, raising the possibility of a conflict of interest, with school-sponsored plans that may be focused on financial benefits to schools rather than the health of students. In addition, these plans may violate public policy and consumer protection laws by charging those who do not enroll in school-sponsored plans higher prices and by disingenuously claiming "competitive" rates when advertising to students. Public efforts at a student mandate, such as in Massachusetts, although successful in increasing the number of students with health insurance, have failed to provide adequate access to care. A focused policy must be put into place to ensure that students can effectively and efficiently access needed health care services on campus. In support of this effort, a proposed statute is provided herein. This bill would amend the Higher Education Opportunity Act to create a student health insurance mandate. School-sponsored plans, as well as private plans with comparable coverage, would be required to fulfill a minimum standard benefits plan. Reasonable exclusions and limitations would be allowed, based on standard practices in commercial health insurance plans. The statute would require a minimum percentage of premiums to be spent on health care, with any excess rebated to students. It would also require schools to accept a student's private health insurance for campus services to avoid forcing students to pay more than once for care. As part of this mandate, a portion of the surplus retained by schools billing private insurers would be allocated to create health insurance scholarships for uninsured students. Finally, the definition of "cost of attendance" would be adjusted to ensure that financial aid calculations take into account health insurance premiums.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demand for Health Insurance in the Time of COVID-19: Evidence from the Special Enrollment Period in the Washington State ACA Marketplace Licensing the Insured: Providing Driver Licenses to Unauthorized Immigrants Has Not Impacted Auto Insurance in California Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Time to Renew . . . or Rethink? Loss of ‘Unattended Property in a Public Place’ – Testing the Good Faith of the Travel Insurer The Insurance Business in Transition to the Physical-Cyber Market: Communication, Coordination and Harmonization of Cyber Risk Coverages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1