印度内幕交易项目报告

Ayan Roy
{"title":"印度内幕交易项目报告","authors":"Ayan Roy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1620386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was only about three decades back that insider trading was recognized in many developed countries as what it was - an injustice; in fact, a crime against shareholders and markets in general. At one time, not so far in the past, inside information and its use for personal profits was regarded as a perk of office and a benefit of having reached a high stage in life. It was the Sunday Times of UK that coined the classic phrase in 1973 to describe this sentiment - \"the crime of being something in the city\", meaning that insider trading was believed as legitimate at one time and a law against insider trading was like a law against high achievement. \"Insider trading\" is a term subject to many definitions and connotations and it encompasses both legal and prohibited activity. Insider trading takes place legally every day, when corporate insiders - officers, directors or employees - buy or sell stock in their own companies within the confines of company policy and the regulations governing this trading. It is the trading that takes place when those privileged with confidential information about important events use the special advantage of that knowledge to reap profits or avoid losses on the stock market, to the detriment of the source of the information and to the typical investors who buy or sell their stock without the advantage of \"inside\" information. Almost eight years ago, India's capital markets watchdog - the Securities and Exchange Board of India organised an international seminar on capital market regulations. The scope of this paper would be restricted to India however reference would be made to foreign jurisdictions to have a better clarity to understand the topic. The important issues would be highlighted at length in the paper and the researcher would try to come up with solutions pertaining to these issues. An attempt would also be made to understand the relevant laws on this topic and the researcher would also try to point out the lacunae in these laws.","PeriodicalId":10000,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Project Report on Insider Trading in India\",\"authors\":\"Ayan Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1620386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was only about three decades back that insider trading was recognized in many developed countries as what it was - an injustice; in fact, a crime against shareholders and markets in general. At one time, not so far in the past, inside information and its use for personal profits was regarded as a perk of office and a benefit of having reached a high stage in life. It was the Sunday Times of UK that coined the classic phrase in 1973 to describe this sentiment - \\\"the crime of being something in the city\\\", meaning that insider trading was believed as legitimate at one time and a law against insider trading was like a law against high achievement. \\\"Insider trading\\\" is a term subject to many definitions and connotations and it encompasses both legal and prohibited activity. Insider trading takes place legally every day, when corporate insiders - officers, directors or employees - buy or sell stock in their own companies within the confines of company policy and the regulations governing this trading. It is the trading that takes place when those privileged with confidential information about important events use the special advantage of that knowledge to reap profits or avoid losses on the stock market, to the detriment of the source of the information and to the typical investors who buy or sell their stock without the advantage of \\\"inside\\\" information. Almost eight years ago, India's capital markets watchdog - the Securities and Exchange Board of India organised an international seminar on capital market regulations. The scope of this paper would be restricted to India however reference would be made to foreign jurisdictions to have a better clarity to understand the topic. The important issues would be highlighted at length in the paper and the researcher would try to come up with solutions pertaining to these issues. An attempt would also be made to understand the relevant laws on this topic and the researcher would also try to point out the lacunae in these laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1620386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1620386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大约30年前,许多发达国家才认识到内幕交易的本质——不公正;事实上,这是对股东和整个市场的犯罪。在不久以前的某个时期,内幕消息及其为个人谋利的利用曾被视为一种办公室福利,以及达到人生高位的一种好处。英国《星期日泰晤士报》(Sunday Times)在1973年创造了一个经典短语来描述这种情绪——“在城市中有所作为的犯罪”(the crime of something in the city),意思是说,内幕交易一度被认为是合法的,反对内幕交易的法律就像反对高成就的法律一样。“内幕交易”是一个有许多定义和内涵的术语,它包括合法和禁止的活动。内幕交易每天都是合法的,当公司内部人士——高管、董事或员工——在公司政策和管理这种交易的法规的范围内买卖自己公司的股票时。内幕交易是指那些拥有重要事件机密信息特权的人利用这一特殊优势在股票市场上获利或避免损失,损害信息来源和那些没有“内幕”信息优势的典型投资者买卖股票的交易。大约8年前,印度资本市场监管机构——印度证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Board of India)组织了一次关于资本市场监管的国际研讨会。本文件的范围将限于印度,但将参考外国司法管辖区,以便更好地理解本专题。重要的问题将在论文中详细强调,研究人员将试图提出与这些问题有关的解决方案。也将尝试了解有关这一主题的法律,并试图指出这些法律的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Project Report on Insider Trading in India
It was only about three decades back that insider trading was recognized in many developed countries as what it was - an injustice; in fact, a crime against shareholders and markets in general. At one time, not so far in the past, inside information and its use for personal profits was regarded as a perk of office and a benefit of having reached a high stage in life. It was the Sunday Times of UK that coined the classic phrase in 1973 to describe this sentiment - "the crime of being something in the city", meaning that insider trading was believed as legitimate at one time and a law against insider trading was like a law against high achievement. "Insider trading" is a term subject to many definitions and connotations and it encompasses both legal and prohibited activity. Insider trading takes place legally every day, when corporate insiders - officers, directors or employees - buy or sell stock in their own companies within the confines of company policy and the regulations governing this trading. It is the trading that takes place when those privileged with confidential information about important events use the special advantage of that knowledge to reap profits or avoid losses on the stock market, to the detriment of the source of the information and to the typical investors who buy or sell their stock without the advantage of "inside" information. Almost eight years ago, India's capital markets watchdog - the Securities and Exchange Board of India organised an international seminar on capital market regulations. The scope of this paper would be restricted to India however reference would be made to foreign jurisdictions to have a better clarity to understand the topic. The important issues would be highlighted at length in the paper and the researcher would try to come up with solutions pertaining to these issues. An attempt would also be made to understand the relevant laws on this topic and the researcher would also try to point out the lacunae in these laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misaligned Incentives in Markets: Envisioning Finance That Benefits All of Society Enforcement Against the Biggest Banks Perspectives on U.S. Financial Regulation Transatlantic Extraterritoriality and the Regulation of Derivatives: The Need for an Integrated Approach between Washington and Brussels, the Uncertainties of BREXIT and New Directions in the US Corporate Governance Oversight and Proxy Advisory Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1