两个OpenFlow控制器的实验评估

M. Darianian, C. Williamson, I. Haque
{"title":"两个OpenFlow控制器的实验评估","authors":"M. Darianian, C. Williamson, I. Haque","doi":"10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software-Defined Networking (SDN) can help simplify the management of today's complex networks and data centers. SDN provides a comprehensive view of the network, offering flexibility and easing automation. In SDN, traffic management functionality requires a high-performance and responsive controller. In this paper, we conduct an experimental evaluation of two open-source distributed OpenFlow controllers, namely ONOS and OpenDaylight. Specifically, we construct a testbed and use a standard benchmarking tool called Cbench to evaluate their performance. We benchmark the throughput, latency, and thread scalability of these two controllers in both physical and virtualized (OpenStack) environments. The experimental results show that ONOS provides higher throughput and lower latency than OpenDaylight, which suffers from performance problems on larger network models. Additional experiments demonstrate the effects of thread placement on the performance of these two controllers.","PeriodicalId":6462,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluation of two OpenFlow controllers\",\"authors\":\"M. Darianian, C. Williamson, I. Haque\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software-Defined Networking (SDN) can help simplify the management of today's complex networks and data centers. SDN provides a comprehensive view of the network, offering flexibility and easing automation. In SDN, traffic management functionality requires a high-performance and responsive controller. In this paper, we conduct an experimental evaluation of two open-source distributed OpenFlow controllers, namely ONOS and OpenDaylight. Specifically, we construct a testbed and use a standard benchmarking tool called Cbench to evaluate their performance. We benchmark the throughput, latency, and thread scalability of these two controllers in both physical and virtualized (OpenStack) environments. The experimental results show that ONOS provides higher throughput and lower latency than OpenDaylight, which suffers from performance problems on larger network models. Additional experiments demonstrate the effects of thread placement on the performance of these two controllers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)可以帮助简化当今复杂网络和数据中心的管理。SDN提供了一个全面的网络视图,提供灵活性和简化自动化。在SDN中,流量管理功能需要一个高性能和响应灵敏的控制器。在本文中,我们对ONOS和OpenDaylight两个开源分布式OpenFlow控制器进行了实验评估。具体来说,我们构建了一个测试平台,并使用一个称为Cbench的标准基准测试工具来评估它们的性能。我们在物理和虚拟化(OpenStack)环境中对这两个控制器的吞吐量、延迟和线程可伸缩性进行基准测试。实验结果表明,ONOS比OpenDaylight提供了更高的吞吐量和更低的延迟,OpenDaylight在更大的网络模型上存在性能问题。另外的实验证明了线程放置对这两个控制器性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental evaluation of two OpenFlow controllers
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) can help simplify the management of today's complex networks and data centers. SDN provides a comprehensive view of the network, offering flexibility and easing automation. In SDN, traffic management functionality requires a high-performance and responsive controller. In this paper, we conduct an experimental evaluation of two open-source distributed OpenFlow controllers, namely ONOS and OpenDaylight. Specifically, we construct a testbed and use a standard benchmarking tool called Cbench to evaluate their performance. We benchmark the throughput, latency, and thread scalability of these two controllers in both physical and virtualized (OpenStack) environments. The experimental results show that ONOS provides higher throughput and lower latency than OpenDaylight, which suffers from performance problems on larger network models. Additional experiments demonstrate the effects of thread placement on the performance of these two controllers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-tier Collaborative Deep Reinforcement Learning for Non-terrestrial Network Empowered Vehicular Connections Message from the General Co-Chairs Algorithm-data driven optimization of adaptive communication networks Planning in compute-aggregate problems as optimization problems on graphs General ternary bit strings on commodity longest-prefix-match infrastructures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1