在危机期间,机构投资者如何应对当地的冲击?使用COVID - 19大流行的测试

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Real Estate Economics Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.12439
David C. Ling, Chongyu Wang, Tingyu Zhou
{"title":"在危机期间,机构投资者如何应对当地的冲击?使用COVID - 19大流行的测试","authors":"David C. Ling, Chongyu Wang, Tingyu Zhou","doi":"10.1111/1540-6229.12439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how institutional investors reacted to geographically dispersed local shocks during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs) enables us to link two layers of geography: the locations of the assets in which the REITs were invested and the headquarters locations of institutional investors who owned REIT shares. We find that the institutional ownership of firms with an economic interest in the investors' home markets declined more if those markets were heavily affected by the pandemic. In addition, the ownership responses to the COVID-19 shock were larger in those markets in which REITs had larger portfolio allocations and in markets that were home to the investors. Importantly, we find that nonpassive and short-term investors may have overreacted to the local shocks because their REIT portfolios subsequently underperformed relative to passive and long-term investors. Our study highlights the importance of geography in the formation of investors' expectations during market crises. © 2023 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.","PeriodicalId":47731,"journal":{"name":"Real Estate Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do institutional investors react to local shocks during a crisis? A test using the COVID‐19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"David C. Ling, Chongyu Wang, Tingyu Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1540-6229.12439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine how institutional investors reacted to geographically dispersed local shocks during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs) enables us to link two layers of geography: the locations of the assets in which the REITs were invested and the headquarters locations of institutional investors who owned REIT shares. We find that the institutional ownership of firms with an economic interest in the investors' home markets declined more if those markets were heavily affected by the pandemic. In addition, the ownership responses to the COVID-19 shock were larger in those markets in which REITs had larger portfolio allocations and in markets that were home to the investors. Importantly, we find that nonpassive and short-term investors may have overreacted to the local shocks because their REIT portfolios subsequently underperformed relative to passive and long-term investors. Our study highlights the importance of geography in the formation of investors' expectations during market crises. © 2023 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real Estate Economics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real Estate Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real Estate Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了在COVID-19大流行的早期阶段,机构投资者如何应对地理分散的局部冲击。房地产投资信托基金(REITs)的样本使我们能够将两层地理位置联系起来:REITs投资的资产所在地和拥有REITs股份的机构投资者的总部所在地。我们发现,如果投资者的本国市场受到大流行的严重影响,那么在这些市场中具有经济利益的公司的机构所有权下降得更多。此外,在房地产投资信托基金拥有更大投资组合配置的市场和投资者居住的市场中,对COVID-19冲击的所有权反应更大。重要的是,我们发现非被动型和短期投资者可能对本地冲击反应过度,因为他们的REIT投资组合随后表现不如被动型和长期投资者。我们的研究强调了地理因素在市场危机期间投资者预期形成中的重要性。©2023美国房地产和城市经济协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do institutional investors react to local shocks during a crisis? A test using the COVID‐19 pandemic
We examine how institutional investors reacted to geographically dispersed local shocks during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs) enables us to link two layers of geography: the locations of the assets in which the REITs were invested and the headquarters locations of institutional investors who owned REIT shares. We find that the institutional ownership of firms with an economic interest in the investors' home markets declined more if those markets were heavily affected by the pandemic. In addition, the ownership responses to the COVID-19 shock were larger in those markets in which REITs had larger portfolio allocations and in markets that were home to the investors. Importantly, we find that nonpassive and short-term investors may have overreacted to the local shocks because their REIT portfolios subsequently underperformed relative to passive and long-term investors. Our study highlights the importance of geography in the formation of investors' expectations during market crises. © 2023 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, Real Estate Economics is the premier journal on real estate topics. Since 1973, Real Estate Economics has been facilitating communication among academic researchers and industry professionals and improving the analysis of real estate decisions. Articles span a wide range of issues, from tax rules to brokers" commissions to corporate real estate including housing and urban economics, and the financial economics of real estate development and investment.
期刊最新文献
Do immigrants equally benefit from rent control? Zero‐price effect and consumer welfare: Evidence from online classified real estate service Housing sales and construction responses to COVID‐19: Evidence from shelter‐in‐place and eviction moratoria in the United States Property management technology adoption in the short‐term housing rental market “Connect” me! Social networking in commercial real estate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1