共和党人、民主党人还是其他人,谁更有宗教信仰和道德观念?

D. Arli, Gunaro Setiawan
{"title":"共和党人、民主党人还是其他人,谁更有宗教信仰和道德观念?","authors":"D. Arli, Gunaro Setiawan","doi":"10.33182/ijor.v4i1.2205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reports show most religious groups in the United States, especially Christian evangelicals, are showing more affiliation to the Republican political party. Nonetheless, members of the Democratic political party are also weaving faith into their rhetoric. A citizen’s affiliation with a political party can change over time, and political affiliation might influence behavior. This study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their: (1) decision-making process purchasing everyday products, (2) relationship with God, (3) and ethical and sustainable behaviors.  Using Pew Research data (n=3,278), this study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their decision-making process in purchasing everyday products, relationship with God, and ethical and sustainable behaviors. Despite significant differences between political parties, most of them have thanked God for something and almost half of them have asked God for help and guidance.   The results show people in the U.S. with various party affiliations are somewhat religious and spiritual. The notion that only Republicans will be guided by religious beliefs is misguided. Almost half of Democrats in this study show strong religious values.\n The paper makes several contributions to this area of study. First, similarities and differences between individuals affiliated with political parties are determined. Second,  myths about stigma toward a particular political party are debunked, and finally, insights for religious and political leaders on their followers’ behavior are provided.","PeriodicalId":37763,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is more religious and ethical, Republicans, Democrats or others?\",\"authors\":\"D. Arli, Gunaro Setiawan\",\"doi\":\"10.33182/ijor.v4i1.2205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reports show most religious groups in the United States, especially Christian evangelicals, are showing more affiliation to the Republican political party. Nonetheless, members of the Democratic political party are also weaving faith into their rhetoric. A citizen’s affiliation with a political party can change over time, and political affiliation might influence behavior. This study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their: (1) decision-making process purchasing everyday products, (2) relationship with God, (3) and ethical and sustainable behaviors.  Using Pew Research data (n=3,278), this study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their decision-making process in purchasing everyday products, relationship with God, and ethical and sustainable behaviors. Despite significant differences between political parties, most of them have thanked God for something and almost half of them have asked God for help and guidance.   The results show people in the U.S. with various party affiliations are somewhat religious and spiritual. The notion that only Republicans will be guided by religious beliefs is misguided. Almost half of Democrats in this study show strong religious values.\\n The paper makes several contributions to this area of study. First, similarities and differences between individuals affiliated with political parties are determined. Second,  myths about stigma toward a particular political party are debunked, and finally, insights for religious and political leaders on their followers’ behavior are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v4i1.2205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v4i1.2205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

报告显示,美国大多数宗教团体,尤其是基督教福音派,越来越倾向于共和党。尽管如此,民主党的成员也在他们的言辞中加入了信仰。公民与政党的关系会随着时间的推移而改变,而政治关系可能会影响行为。本研究比较和对比了政党成员和非政党成员在以下方面的差异:(1)购买日常产品的决策过程;(2)与上帝的关系;(3)道德和可持续行为。利用皮尤研究中心(Pew Research)的数据(n= 3278),这项研究比较和对比了在购买日常产品、与上帝的关系、道德和可持续行为方面,有政党背景的人和没有政党背景的人。尽管政党之间存在巨大差异,但大多数人都感谢过上帝,近一半的人曾向上帝寻求帮助和指引。调查结果显示,不同党派的美国人都有一定程度的宗教信仰和精神信仰。只有共和党人会被宗教信仰所引导的观念是错误的。在这项研究中,几乎一半的民主党人表现出强烈的宗教价值观。本文对这一研究领域作出了若干贡献。首先,确定政党成员之间的异同。其次,揭穿了对特定政党的耻辱的神话,最后,为宗教和政治领导人提供了对其追随者行为的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who is more religious and ethical, Republicans, Democrats or others?
Reports show most religious groups in the United States, especially Christian evangelicals, are showing more affiliation to the Republican political party. Nonetheless, members of the Democratic political party are also weaving faith into their rhetoric. A citizen’s affiliation with a political party can change over time, and political affiliation might influence behavior. This study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their: (1) decision-making process purchasing everyday products, (2) relationship with God, (3) and ethical and sustainable behaviors.  Using Pew Research data (n=3,278), this study compares and contrasts individuals affiliated with political parties and those who are not on their decision-making process in purchasing everyday products, relationship with God, and ethical and sustainable behaviors. Despite significant differences between political parties, most of them have thanked God for something and almost half of them have asked God for help and guidance.   The results show people in the U.S. with various party affiliations are somewhat religious and spiritual. The notion that only Republicans will be guided by religious beliefs is misguided. Almost half of Democrats in this study show strong religious values.  The paper makes several contributions to this area of study. First, similarities and differences between individuals affiliated with political parties are determined. Second,  myths about stigma toward a particular political party are debunked, and finally, insights for religious and political leaders on their followers’ behavior are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society aims to create an intellectual frame of reference for the academic study of religion and spirituality and to create an interdisciplinary conversation on the role of religion and spirituality in society. It is intended as a place for critical engagement, examination, and experimentation of ideas that connect religious philosophies to their contexts throughout history in the world, places of worship, on the streets, and in communities. The journal addresses the need for critical discussion on religious issues—specifically as they are situated in the present-day contexts of ethics, warfare, politics, anthropology, sociology, education, leadership, artistic engagement, and the dissonance or resonance between religious tradition and modern trends. Articles published in the journal range from the expansive and philosophical to finely grained analysis based on deep familiarity and understanding of a particular area of religious knowledge. They bring into dialogue philosophers, theologians, policy makers, and educators, to name a few of the stakeholders in this conversation. The journal is relevant to teachers, philosophers, theologians, policy makers, and educators with an interest in, and a concern for, religious practice, religious theory and research, the impact of religious and spiritual traditions on world views, and the impact of current societal trends on religious and spiritual traditions. The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society is peer-reviewed, supported by rigorous processes of criterion-referenced article ranking and qualitative commentary, ensuring that only intellectual work of the greatest substance and highest significance is published.
期刊最新文献
Diseases in the Bible and Quran: differences between grace or punishment from the Jerusalem God Identity, Nostalgia and Religion: Making Sense of Turkey and the Balkan Relations in the Twenty-first Century Veiled Integration: The Use of Headscarves among a Christian Minority in Sweden Who is more religious and ethical, Republicans, Democrats or others? A Descriptive Study of Participating in Vedic Rituals and Belief in the Existence of God on Psychological Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1