纯净与污染:女权主义者对北方邦诉考沙利亚案(1964 SC 416)的改写

Indian Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339

Anindita Pattanayak, D. McDonald-Norman

{"title":"纯净与污染:女权主义者对北方邦诉考沙利亚案(1964 SC 416)的改写","authors":"Anindita Pattanayak, D. McDonald-Norman","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Supreme Court’s judgement in State of Uttar Pradesh v Kaushailiya (“Kaushailiya”) affirmed the constitutionality of section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956. Our “alternative judgement” and commentary challenge the reasoning of the bench in that case from a feminist perspective, including Subba Rao J’s implicit use of concepts of contamination and pollution to support his Lordship’s reasoning.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purity and pollution: a feminist rewriting of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushailiya AIR 1964 SC 416\",\"authors\":\"Anindita Pattanayak, D. McDonald-Norman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Supreme Court’s judgement in State of Uttar Pradesh v Kaushailiya (“Kaushailiya”) affirmed the constitutionality of section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956. Our “alternative judgement” and commentary challenge the reasoning of the bench in that case from a feminist perspective, including Subba Rao J’s implicit use of concepts of contamination and pollution to support his Lordship’s reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

印度最高法院在北方邦诉考沙利亚案(“考沙利亚”)一案中确认了1956年《禁止不道德买卖妇女和女童法》第20条的合宪性。我们的“另类判断”和评论从女权主义的角度对法官的推理提出了挑战，包括苏巴·拉奥(Subba Rao J)隐含地使用污染和污染的概念来支持法官的推理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Purity and pollution: a feminist rewriting of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushailiya AIR 1964 SC 416

ABSTRACT The Supreme Court’s judgement in State of Uttar Pradesh v Kaushailiya (“Kaushailiya”) affirmed the constitutionality of section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956. Our “alternative judgement” and commentary challenge the reasoning of the bench in that case from a feminist perspective, including Subba Rao J’s implicit use of concepts of contamination and pollution to support his Lordship’s reasoning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indian Law Review

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量