菲律宾高中生科学推理、批判性思维与科学成绩之研究

Utamax Pub Date : 2022-03-24 DOI:10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284
Leah Mae F. Farillon
{"title":"菲律宾高中生科学推理、批判性思维与科学成绩之研究","authors":"Leah Mae F. Farillon","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This correlational study on quantitative in nature was conducted to determine the relationship of scientific reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, and performance in Science of senior high school (SHS) students at Tapaz National High School, Capiz, Philippines. The variables in this study are the six different strands in SHS, namely, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM); General Academic Strand (GAS); Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM); Home Economics (HE); Information and Communications Technology (ICT); and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW). The study used three instruments to quantify its goal with the statistical tools used to analyse data, i.e. the mean, standard deviation, and Pearson's r correlation coefficient. All inferential tests were set at 0.05 alpha level. The findings of the study revealed that the level of scientific reasoning skills of SHS students when taken as a whole was \"high\", and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT were \"high\" while the SMAW was on “average” level of critical thinking skills. While when taken as a whole is found \"developed\" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT are \"developed\" while the SMAW is \"moderately developed\"; and their level of performance in Science, when taken as a whole, is \"very satisfactory\" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, and HE were \"very satisfactory\" while the ICT and SMAW are \"satisfactory\". A significant relationship among the variables was taken as a whole and grouped according to strand. Students should learn to engage in scientific argumentation to develop their scientific reasoning and critical thinking skills. Also, the teachers should build up certain students' skills to better their performance in Science and other subjects. The school administration should also look for more sustainable programs and workshops for the teachers and students to improve their studies and lives.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Reasoning, Critical Thinking, and Academic Performance in Science of Selected Filipino Senior High School Students\",\"authors\":\"Leah Mae F. Farillon\",\"doi\":\"10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This correlational study on quantitative in nature was conducted to determine the relationship of scientific reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, and performance in Science of senior high school (SHS) students at Tapaz National High School, Capiz, Philippines. The variables in this study are the six different strands in SHS, namely, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM); General Academic Strand (GAS); Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM); Home Economics (HE); Information and Communications Technology (ICT); and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW). The study used three instruments to quantify its goal with the statistical tools used to analyse data, i.e. the mean, standard deviation, and Pearson's r correlation coefficient. All inferential tests were set at 0.05 alpha level. The findings of the study revealed that the level of scientific reasoning skills of SHS students when taken as a whole was \\\"high\\\", and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT were \\\"high\\\" while the SMAW was on “average” level of critical thinking skills. While when taken as a whole is found \\\"developed\\\" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT are \\\"developed\\\" while the SMAW is \\\"moderately developed\\\"; and their level of performance in Science, when taken as a whole, is \\\"very satisfactory\\\" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, and HE were \\\"very satisfactory\\\" while the ICT and SMAW are \\\"satisfactory\\\". A significant relationship among the variables was taken as a whole and grouped according to strand. Students should learn to engage in scientific argumentation to develop their scientific reasoning and critical thinking skills. Also, the teachers should build up certain students' skills to better their performance in Science and other subjects. The school administration should also look for more sustainable programs and workshops for the teachers and students to improve their studies and lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utamax\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utamax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utamax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨菲律宾卡皮兹市Tapaz国家高中学生科学推理能力、批判性思维能力与科学成绩之间的关系。本研究的变量是SHS的六个不同分支,即科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM);通用学术链(GAS);会计、商业和管理(ABM);家政(HE);信息和通信技术(ICT);和保护金属电弧焊(SMAW)。该研究使用了三种工具来量化其目标,即用于分析数据的统计工具,即平均值,标准差和Pearson's r相关系数。所有推论检验均采用0.05 α水平。研究结果显示,SHS学生的科学推理能力整体水平为“高”,STEM、GAS、ABM、HE和ICT的水平为“高”,而SMAW学生的批判性思维能力处于“平均”水平。整体来看,STEM、GAS、ABM、HE和ICT是“发达”的,而SMAW是“中等发达”的;他们在科学方面的表现水平,从整体上看是“非常令人满意的”,如果按照学科分类,STEM、GAS、ABM和HE是“非常令人满意的”,而ICT和SMAW是“令人满意的”。将各变量之间的显著关系作为一个整体,按序列进行分组。学生应该学会进行科学论证,培养他们的科学推理和批判性思维能力。此外,教师应该培养学生的某些技能,以提高他们在科学和其他学科的表现。学校管理部门也应该为教师和学生寻找更可持续的项目和研讨会,以改善他们的学习和生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scientific Reasoning, Critical Thinking, and Academic Performance in Science of Selected Filipino Senior High School Students
This correlational study on quantitative in nature was conducted to determine the relationship of scientific reasoning skills, critical thinking skills, and performance in Science of senior high school (SHS) students at Tapaz National High School, Capiz, Philippines. The variables in this study are the six different strands in SHS, namely, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM); General Academic Strand (GAS); Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM); Home Economics (HE); Information and Communications Technology (ICT); and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW). The study used three instruments to quantify its goal with the statistical tools used to analyse data, i.e. the mean, standard deviation, and Pearson's r correlation coefficient. All inferential tests were set at 0.05 alpha level. The findings of the study revealed that the level of scientific reasoning skills of SHS students when taken as a whole was "high", and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT were "high" while the SMAW was on “average” level of critical thinking skills. While when taken as a whole is found "developed" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, HE, and ICT are "developed" while the SMAW is "moderately developed"; and their level of performance in Science, when taken as a whole, is "very satisfactory" and when grouped according to strand, the STEM, GAS, ABM, and HE were "very satisfactory" while the ICT and SMAW are "satisfactory". A significant relationship among the variables was taken as a whole and grouped according to strand. Students should learn to engage in scientific argumentation to develop their scientific reasoning and critical thinking skills. Also, the teachers should build up certain students' skills to better their performance in Science and other subjects. The school administration should also look for more sustainable programs and workshops for the teachers and students to improve their studies and lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bringing Diversity Education to Life: The Impact of Learning Videos on Elementary School Students' Learning Outcomes Experiences of Student Teachers in Thailand: A Pre-service Teacher Training Encounter Unlocking the Path to Academic Excellence: Unraveling the Impact of 480 Class Hours in Improving Reading Ability for Lecturers Overcoming the Character Crisis in Children: Strategies, Outcomes, and Evaluations of Bina desa Program Social Interaction of Students with Gadget: Patterns and Experiences during School Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1