{"title":"结直肠癌风险与腹部肥胖有关。数据审核","authors":"H. Anis","doi":"10.15406/JCPCR.2020.11.00441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stratifying by sex from male and female CRC, for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level, were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.19-1.59) and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.28-1.61) respectively. By geographic region, the pooled RRs of CRC for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level were 1.31 for Asia, 1.50 in the United States, and 1.29 for Europe. Meta-regression analysis showed that geographic region was the source of heterogeneity.1,3","PeriodicalId":15185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal cancer risk associated with abdominal obesity. data review\",\"authors\":\"H. Anis\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/JCPCR.2020.11.00441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stratifying by sex from male and female CRC, for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level, were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.19-1.59) and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.28-1.61) respectively. By geographic region, the pooled RRs of CRC for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level were 1.31 for Asia, 1.50 in the United States, and 1.29 for Europe. Meta-regression analysis showed that geographic region was the source of heterogeneity.1,3\",\"PeriodicalId\":15185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/JCPCR.2020.11.00441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Prevention & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JCPCR.2020.11.00441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Colorectal cancer risk associated with abdominal obesity. data review
Stratifying by sex from male and female CRC, for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level, were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.19-1.59) and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.28-1.61) respectively. By geographic region, the pooled RRs of CRC for the highest vs. lowest categories of WC level were 1.31 for Asia, 1.50 in the United States, and 1.29 for Europe. Meta-regression analysis showed that geographic region was the source of heterogeneity.1,3