Jia Guo, E. Gong, A. Fan, M. Goubran, M. Khalighi, G. Zaharchuk
{"title":"利用深度卷积神经网络预测多对比MRI 15O-Water PET脑血流量图,并评估训练队列偏差","authors":"Jia Guo, E. Gong, A. Fan, M. Goubran, M. Khalighi, G. Zaharchuk","doi":"10.1177/0271678X19888123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the quality of MRI-based cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements, a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) was trained to combine single- and multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) and structural images to predict gold-standard 15O-water PET CBF images obtained on a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner. The dCNN was trained and tested on 64 scans in 16 healthy controls (HC) and 16 cerebrovascular disease patients (PT) with 4-fold cross-validation. Fidelity to the PET CBF images and the effects of bias due to training on different cohorts were examined. The dCNN significantly improved CBF image quality compared with ASL alone (mean ± standard deviation): structural similarity index (0.854 ± 0.036 vs. 0.743 ± 0.045 [single-delay] and 0.732 ± 0.041 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001); normalized root mean squared error (0.209 ± 0.039 vs. 0.326 ± 0.050 [single-delay] and 0.344 ± 0.055 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001). The dCNN also yielded mean CBF with reduced estimation error in both HC and PT (P < 0.001), and demonstrated better correlation with PET. The dCNN trained with the mixed HC and PT cohort performed the best. The results also suggested that models should be trained on cases representative of the target population.","PeriodicalId":15356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","volume":"48 1","pages":"2240 - 2253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting 15O-Water PET cerebral blood flow maps from multi-contrast MRI using a deep convolutional neural network with evaluation of training cohort bias\",\"authors\":\"Jia Guo, E. Gong, A. Fan, M. Goubran, M. Khalighi, G. Zaharchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0271678X19888123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve the quality of MRI-based cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements, a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) was trained to combine single- and multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) and structural images to predict gold-standard 15O-water PET CBF images obtained on a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner. The dCNN was trained and tested on 64 scans in 16 healthy controls (HC) and 16 cerebrovascular disease patients (PT) with 4-fold cross-validation. Fidelity to the PET CBF images and the effects of bias due to training on different cohorts were examined. The dCNN significantly improved CBF image quality compared with ASL alone (mean ± standard deviation): structural similarity index (0.854 ± 0.036 vs. 0.743 ± 0.045 [single-delay] and 0.732 ± 0.041 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001); normalized root mean squared error (0.209 ± 0.039 vs. 0.326 ± 0.050 [single-delay] and 0.344 ± 0.055 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001). The dCNN also yielded mean CBF with reduced estimation error in both HC and PT (P < 0.001), and demonstrated better correlation with PET. The dCNN trained with the mixed HC and PT cohort performed the best. The results also suggested that models should be trained on cases representative of the target population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"2240 - 2253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19888123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19888123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
摘要
为了提高基于MRI的脑血流量(CBF)测量的质量,我们训练了一个深度卷积神经网络(dCNN),将单延迟和多延迟动脉自旋标记(ASL)和结构图像结合起来,预测同时在PET/MRI扫描仪上获得的金标准15O-water PET CBF图像。dCNN在16名健康对照(HC)和16名脑血管病患者(PT)中进行了64次扫描训练和测试,并进行了4倍交叉验证。对PET脑血流图像的保真度和训练对不同队列的偏差影响进行了检查。与单独使用ASL相比,dCNN显著改善了CBF图像质量(平均值±标准差):结构相似性指数(0.854±0.036 vs. 0.743±0.045[单延迟]和0.732±0.041[多延迟],P < 0.0001);归一化均方根误差(0.209±0.039 vs. 0.326±0.050[单延迟]和0.344±0.055[多延迟],P < 0.0001)。dCNN在HC和PT的平均CBF估计误差均降低(P < 0.001),并且与PET的相关性更好。采用HC和PT混合队列训练的dCNN表现最好。研究结果还表明,应该根据代表目标人群的案例对模型进行训练。
Predicting 15O-Water PET cerebral blood flow maps from multi-contrast MRI using a deep convolutional neural network with evaluation of training cohort bias
To improve the quality of MRI-based cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements, a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) was trained to combine single- and multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) and structural images to predict gold-standard 15O-water PET CBF images obtained on a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner. The dCNN was trained and tested on 64 scans in 16 healthy controls (HC) and 16 cerebrovascular disease patients (PT) with 4-fold cross-validation. Fidelity to the PET CBF images and the effects of bias due to training on different cohorts were examined. The dCNN significantly improved CBF image quality compared with ASL alone (mean ± standard deviation): structural similarity index (0.854 ± 0.036 vs. 0.743 ± 0.045 [single-delay] and 0.732 ± 0.041 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001); normalized root mean squared error (0.209 ± 0.039 vs. 0.326 ± 0.050 [single-delay] and 0.344 ± 0.055 [multi-delay], P < 0.0001). The dCNN also yielded mean CBF with reduced estimation error in both HC and PT (P < 0.001), and demonstrated better correlation with PET. The dCNN trained with the mixed HC and PT cohort performed the best. The results also suggested that models should be trained on cases representative of the target population.