新能源发电企业财务业绩更好吗?中国发电行业分析

IF 3.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-05 DOI:10.1080/15567249.2021.2023707
Hangxing Zhou, Jian Sun
{"title":"新能源发电企业财务业绩更好吗?中国发电行业分析","authors":"Hangxing Zhou, Jian Sun","doi":"10.1080/15567249.2021.2023707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fossil-fired power generation is the most significant contributor to China’s carbon emissions. New energy such as wind and solar is rapidly deploying in China and is considered an alternative to fossil energy. This paper focuses on the comparison in financial performance between fossil-fired generation and new energy generation companies. To do so, we combine the listed companies’ financial data from 2010 to 2020 with the catastrophe progression method to evaluate the financial performance of China’s power generation companies. The results indicate that although the profitability of the fossil-fired generation industry has stagnated in the past ten years, its comprehensive financial performance is still better than that of the new energy industry. The profitability of new energy companies has increased significantly in the past decade, especially the wind energy companies, whose profitability has greatly improved from 2013 to 2020. Wind power generation also has outstanding operating capacity among new energy generations.","PeriodicalId":51247,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do new energy power generation companies have better financial performance? An analysis for China’s power generation industry\",\"authors\":\"Hangxing Zhou, Jian Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15567249.2021.2023707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fossil-fired power generation is the most significant contributor to China’s carbon emissions. New energy such as wind and solar is rapidly deploying in China and is considered an alternative to fossil energy. This paper focuses on the comparison in financial performance between fossil-fired generation and new energy generation companies. To do so, we combine the listed companies’ financial data from 2010 to 2020 with the catastrophe progression method to evaluate the financial performance of China’s power generation companies. The results indicate that although the profitability of the fossil-fired generation industry has stagnated in the past ten years, its comprehensive financial performance is still better than that of the new energy industry. The profitability of new energy companies has increased significantly in the past decade, especially the wind energy companies, whose profitability has greatly improved from 2013 to 2020. Wind power generation also has outstanding operating capacity among new energy generations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2021.2023707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2021.2023707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:化石燃料发电是中国碳排放的最大来源。风能和太阳能等新能源正在中国迅速发展,被认为是化石能源的替代品。本文主要对化石燃料发电企业和新能源发电企业的财务绩效进行比较。为此,我们结合2010年至2020年上市公司的财务数据,运用巨灾级数法对中国发电企业的财务绩效进行了评价。结果表明,尽管近十年来火电发电行业的盈利能力停滞不前,但其综合财务绩效仍优于新能源行业。近十年来,新能源企业的盈利能力显著提升,尤其是风能企业,2013年至2020年盈利能力大幅提升。风力发电在新一代能源中也具有突出的运行能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do new energy power generation companies have better financial performance? An analysis for China’s power generation industry
ABSTRACT Fossil-fired power generation is the most significant contributor to China’s carbon emissions. New energy such as wind and solar is rapidly deploying in China and is considered an alternative to fossil energy. This paper focuses on the comparison in financial performance between fossil-fired generation and new energy generation companies. To do so, we combine the listed companies’ financial data from 2010 to 2020 with the catastrophe progression method to evaluate the financial performance of China’s power generation companies. The results indicate that although the profitability of the fossil-fired generation industry has stagnated in the past ten years, its comprehensive financial performance is still better than that of the new energy industry. The profitability of new energy companies has increased significantly in the past decade, especially the wind energy companies, whose profitability has greatly improved from 2013 to 2020. Wind power generation also has outstanding operating capacity among new energy generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
12.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index. Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
期刊最新文献
Prediction of natural gas demand by considering implications of energy-related policies: The case of Türkiye Towards 2050 net zero carbon infrastructure: a critical review of key decarbonization challenges in the domestic heating sector in the UK The impact of the oil price on mineable and non-mineable cryptocurrencies A comprehensive model to explain consumers’ purchasing intention of energy-efficient household appliances: A case study in China Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon hydrogen exports from the Middle East to the Asia-Pacific, and Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1