1.4541和1.4301奥氏体不锈钢抗空化侵蚀性能的比较

D. Zakrzewska, A. Krella, A. Marchewicz
{"title":"1.4541和1.4301奥氏体不锈钢抗空化侵蚀性能的比较","authors":"D. Zakrzewska, A. Krella, A. Marchewicz","doi":"10.3390/cmdwc2021-10060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The one of the common causes of damage of water turbines, marine propellers, pumps or other components of hydraulic machinery, which contribute to their faster failure, is the cavitation erosion. The cause of cavitation erosion is the phenomenon of cavitation which is caused by formation and collapse of bubbles in liquids that are subjected to frequent pressure change. Cavitation bubbles with the possibility of several times of growth and imploding arise from cavitation embryos, which are insoluble gases contained in the liquid. The cavitation tests were performed in cavitation tunnel equipped with system of the barricades. The following flow velocity values were obtained: 2.30 m∙s −1 , 2.49 m∙s -1 m∙s −1 , 2.67 m∙s −1 and 2.83 m∙s −1 . The tested materials were two types of the austenitic stainless steels–1.4301 and 1.4541 after heat treatment. The study compares the impact of mechanical properties, the chemical composition of steel and the flow velocity on cavitation resistance. The test results showed that steel 1.4301 had better cavitation erosion resistance than 1.4541 steel at all set flow rates. The differences in weight loss and roughness (Ra parameter) were about two times higher for 1.4541 steel compared to 1.4301steel. Moreover, the similar mechanisms of surface degradation were observed. The conducted tests showed a significant influence of the fluid flow, chemical composition and mechanical properties on the cavitation erosion resistance.","PeriodicalId":20503,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1st Corrosion and Materials Degradation Web Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of cavitation erosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels 1.4541 and 1.4301\",\"authors\":\"D. Zakrzewska, A. Krella, A. Marchewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cmdwc2021-10060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The one of the common causes of damage of water turbines, marine propellers, pumps or other components of hydraulic machinery, which contribute to their faster failure, is the cavitation erosion. The cause of cavitation erosion is the phenomenon of cavitation which is caused by formation and collapse of bubbles in liquids that are subjected to frequent pressure change. Cavitation bubbles with the possibility of several times of growth and imploding arise from cavitation embryos, which are insoluble gases contained in the liquid. The cavitation tests were performed in cavitation tunnel equipped with system of the barricades. The following flow velocity values were obtained: 2.30 m∙s −1 , 2.49 m∙s -1 m∙s −1 , 2.67 m∙s −1 and 2.83 m∙s −1 . The tested materials were two types of the austenitic stainless steels–1.4301 and 1.4541 after heat treatment. The study compares the impact of mechanical properties, the chemical composition of steel and the flow velocity on cavitation resistance. The test results showed that steel 1.4301 had better cavitation erosion resistance than 1.4541 steel at all set flow rates. The differences in weight loss and roughness (Ra parameter) were about two times higher for 1.4541 steel compared to 1.4301steel. Moreover, the similar mechanisms of surface degradation were observed. The conducted tests showed a significant influence of the fluid flow, chemical composition and mechanical properties on the cavitation erosion resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1st Corrosion and Materials Degradation Web Conference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1st Corrosion and Materials Degradation Web Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmdwc2021-10060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1st Corrosion and Materials Degradation Web Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmdwc2021-10060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水轮机、船用螺旋桨、泵或其他液压机械部件损坏的常见原因之一是空化侵蚀,这是导致它们更快失效的原因之一。空化侵蚀的原因是由于液体在频繁的压力变化下气泡的形成和破裂而引起的空化现象。空化胚是液体中含有的不溶性气体,产生了具有多次生长和内爆可能性的空化气泡。在配备防护栏系统的空化隧道中进行了空化试验。流速值分别为2.30 m∙s−1、2.49 m∙s−1、2.67 m∙s−1和2.83 m∙s−1。试验材料为热处理后的1.4301和1.4541两种奥氏体不锈钢。研究比较了力学性能、钢的化学成分和流速对空化阻力的影响。试验结果表明,在所有设定的流量下,1.4301钢的抗空化侵蚀性能都优于1.4541钢。1.4541钢的失重和粗糙度(Ra参数)的差异约为1.4301钢的两倍。此外,还观察到类似的表面降解机制。试验结果表明,流体流动、化学成分和力学性能对抗空化侵蚀性能有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The comparison of cavitation erosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels 1.4541 and 1.4301
: The one of the common causes of damage of water turbines, marine propellers, pumps or other components of hydraulic machinery, which contribute to their faster failure, is the cavitation erosion. The cause of cavitation erosion is the phenomenon of cavitation which is caused by formation and collapse of bubbles in liquids that are subjected to frequent pressure change. Cavitation bubbles with the possibility of several times of growth and imploding arise from cavitation embryos, which are insoluble gases contained in the liquid. The cavitation tests were performed in cavitation tunnel equipped with system of the barricades. The following flow velocity values were obtained: 2.30 m∙s −1 , 2.49 m∙s -1 m∙s −1 , 2.67 m∙s −1 and 2.83 m∙s −1 . The tested materials were two types of the austenitic stainless steels–1.4301 and 1.4541 after heat treatment. The study compares the impact of mechanical properties, the chemical composition of steel and the flow velocity on cavitation resistance. The test results showed that steel 1.4301 had better cavitation erosion resistance than 1.4541 steel at all set flow rates. The differences in weight loss and roughness (Ra parameter) were about two times higher for 1.4541 steel compared to 1.4301steel. Moreover, the similar mechanisms of surface degradation were observed. The conducted tests showed a significant influence of the fluid flow, chemical composition and mechanical properties on the cavitation erosion resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slurry erosion resistance of ferritic X10CrAlSi18 and austenitic AISI 304 stainless steels Corrosivity of different natural groundwaters from repository sites Effect of indium chloride on corrosion of Mg under polarization The comparison of cavitation erosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels 1.4541 and 1.4301 On post-hydrostatic testing microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC): causes and preventional methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1