4CPS-394肺移植受者治疗知识程度评价

R. Sevilla, M. Salvador, I. Baena, García Cerezuela, C. L. Llano, A. Álvarez, SM Sanz Rodríaguez, Jiménez López, T. M. Gomez, MP Ussetti Gil, A. S. Guerrero
{"title":"4CPS-394肺移植受者治疗知识程度评价","authors":"R. Sevilla, M. Salvador, I. Baena, García Cerezuela, C. L. Llano, A. Álvarez, SM Sanz Rodríaguez, Jiménez López, T. M. Gomez, MP Ussetti Gil, A. S. Guerrero","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Lung transplant (LT) recipients require intensive and continuous care due to the complexity and relevance of pharmacological treatments in the clinical course after transplantation. Acute rejection, infections and side effects of immunosuppressants are common, especially during the first year after transplantation. Patients must acquire knowledge and skills that allow them to actively participate in the control of their ‘new disease’. Aim and objectives To analyse the degree of LT recipient knowledge about their treatment in the immediate post-transplant period and to identify weaknesses and characteristics of the patients. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted from June to December 2019, corresponding to the pilot phase of an e-learning programme in LT recipients (e-duca). We designed a 25 multiple answer question test which was completed by the patients before post-transplant discharge. Variables studied were: age, gender, LT indication, educational level, number of drugs prescribed at discharge, test score (TS) and answers correctly with more or less frequency. We considered a high degree of knowledge as a TS ≥20, moderate 13–20 and deficient Results 16 patients were included with a mean age of 61.4 years (48–68) and 81.3% (13) were men. The LT indication was COPD in 56.3% (9), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 37.5% (6) and bronchiectasis in 6.2% (1). Educational levels were university (3), secondary (4) and basic (9). The average number of drugs prescribed at discharge was 14.31 (9–20). Mean TS was 14.56 (6–22), equivalent to 58.2% of correct answers. 31.3% (5) of patients demonstrated a poor degree of knowledge, 62.5% (10) moderate and 6.2% (1) high. The most frequently correct answers were related to how to take tacrolimus and mycophenolate (87.5%) and the function and duration of immunosuppressive treatment (93.8%). On the other hand, the least frequently correct answers were related to the role of adjuvant therapy: only to prevent infections (93.8%), to identify prednisone as immunosuppressant (56.3%) and acting correctly when vomiting after taking immunosuppressants (56.3%). Conclusion and relevance This type of test allows us to know the patients’ skills about their treatment and to identify which points need to be reinforced by the pharmacist as part of the healthcare team that attends to the patient. It also allows early detection of possible medication errors. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4CPS-394 Evaluation of the degree of therapeutic knowledge in lung transplant recipients\",\"authors\":\"R. Sevilla, M. Salvador, I. Baena, García Cerezuela, C. L. Llano, A. Álvarez, SM Sanz Rodríaguez, Jiménez López, T. M. Gomez, MP Ussetti Gil, A. S. Guerrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance Lung transplant (LT) recipients require intensive and continuous care due to the complexity and relevance of pharmacological treatments in the clinical course after transplantation. Acute rejection, infections and side effects of immunosuppressants are common, especially during the first year after transplantation. Patients must acquire knowledge and skills that allow them to actively participate in the control of their ‘new disease’. Aim and objectives To analyse the degree of LT recipient knowledge about their treatment in the immediate post-transplant period and to identify weaknesses and characteristics of the patients. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted from June to December 2019, corresponding to the pilot phase of an e-learning programme in LT recipients (e-duca). We designed a 25 multiple answer question test which was completed by the patients before post-transplant discharge. Variables studied were: age, gender, LT indication, educational level, number of drugs prescribed at discharge, test score (TS) and answers correctly with more or less frequency. We considered a high degree of knowledge as a TS ≥20, moderate 13–20 and deficient Results 16 patients were included with a mean age of 61.4 years (48–68) and 81.3% (13) were men. The LT indication was COPD in 56.3% (9), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 37.5% (6) and bronchiectasis in 6.2% (1). Educational levels were university (3), secondary (4) and basic (9). The average number of drugs prescribed at discharge was 14.31 (9–20). Mean TS was 14.56 (6–22), equivalent to 58.2% of correct answers. 31.3% (5) of patients demonstrated a poor degree of knowledge, 62.5% (10) moderate and 6.2% (1) high. The most frequently correct answers were related to how to take tacrolimus and mycophenolate (87.5%) and the function and duration of immunosuppressive treatment (93.8%). On the other hand, the least frequently correct answers were related to the role of adjuvant therapy: only to prevent infections (93.8%), to identify prednisone as immunosuppressant (56.3%) and acting correctly when vomiting after taking immunosuppressants (56.3%). Conclusion and relevance This type of test allows us to know the patients’ skills about their treatment and to identify which points need to be reinforced by the pharmacist as part of the healthcare team that attends to the patient. It also allows early detection of possible medication errors. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性由于移植后临床过程中药物治疗的复杂性和相关性,肺移植(LT)受者需要强化和持续的护理。急性排斥反应、感染和免疫抑制剂的副作用是常见的,特别是在移植后的第一年。患者必须获得知识和技能,使他们能够积极参与控制他们的“新疾病”。目的和目的分析肝移植术后肝移植受者对其治疗的认知程度,找出患者的弱点和特点。材料和方法2019年6月至12月进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,对应于LT接受者(e-duca)电子学习计划的试点阶段。我们设计了一份由患者在移植后出院前完成的25道答题测试。研究的变量包括:年龄、性别、肝移植适应症、教育程度、出院时处方药物数量、测试分数(TS)和正确回答的频率。我们将高知识程度视为TS≥20,中度13 - 20和缺陷。结果纳入16例患者,平均年龄为61.4岁(48-68岁),81.3%(13)为男性。慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)占56.3%(9),特发性肺纤维化(37.5%)占37.5%(6),支气管扩张(6.2%)占6.2%(1)。学历为大学(3)、中学(4)和基础(9)。出院时平均用药14.31(9 - 20)。平均TS为14.56(6-22),正确率为58.2%。31.3%(5)的患者知识程度差,62.5%(10)的患者知识程度中等,6.2%(1)的患者知识程度高。正确答案最多的是如何服用他克莫司和麦考酚酸酯(87.5%)和免疫抑制治疗的功能和持续时间(93.8%)。另一方面,最少的正确答案与辅助治疗的作用有关:仅预防感染(93.8%),识别强的松为免疫抑制剂(56.3%)和服用免疫抑制剂后呕吐时正确行动(56.3%)。结论和相关性这种类型的测试使我们能够了解患者的治疗技能,并确定药剂师作为护理患者的医疗团队的一部分需要加强哪些方面。它还可以早期发现可能的用药错误。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4CPS-394 Evaluation of the degree of therapeutic knowledge in lung transplant recipients
Background and importance Lung transplant (LT) recipients require intensive and continuous care due to the complexity and relevance of pharmacological treatments in the clinical course after transplantation. Acute rejection, infections and side effects of immunosuppressants are common, especially during the first year after transplantation. Patients must acquire knowledge and skills that allow them to actively participate in the control of their ‘new disease’. Aim and objectives To analyse the degree of LT recipient knowledge about their treatment in the immediate post-transplant period and to identify weaknesses and characteristics of the patients. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted from June to December 2019, corresponding to the pilot phase of an e-learning programme in LT recipients (e-duca). We designed a 25 multiple answer question test which was completed by the patients before post-transplant discharge. Variables studied were: age, gender, LT indication, educational level, number of drugs prescribed at discharge, test score (TS) and answers correctly with more or less frequency. We considered a high degree of knowledge as a TS ≥20, moderate 13–20 and deficient Results 16 patients were included with a mean age of 61.4 years (48–68) and 81.3% (13) were men. The LT indication was COPD in 56.3% (9), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 37.5% (6) and bronchiectasis in 6.2% (1). Educational levels were university (3), secondary (4) and basic (9). The average number of drugs prescribed at discharge was 14.31 (9–20). Mean TS was 14.56 (6–22), equivalent to 58.2% of correct answers. 31.3% (5) of patients demonstrated a poor degree of knowledge, 62.5% (10) moderate and 6.2% (1) high. The most frequently correct answers were related to how to take tacrolimus and mycophenolate (87.5%) and the function and duration of immunosuppressive treatment (93.8%). On the other hand, the least frequently correct answers were related to the role of adjuvant therapy: only to prevent infections (93.8%), to identify prednisone as immunosuppressant (56.3%) and acting correctly when vomiting after taking immunosuppressants (56.3%). Conclusion and relevance This type of test allows us to know the patients’ skills about their treatment and to identify which points need to be reinforced by the pharmacist as part of the healthcare team that attends to the patient. It also allows early detection of possible medication errors. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1