我们到了吗?通过确保一个强大的审计职业在未来保护投资者

Jeanette M. Franzel
{"title":"我们到了吗?通过确保一个强大的审计职业在未来保护投资者","authors":"Jeanette M. Franzel","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 2008, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP) issued a report with findings and recommendations to address the sustainability and effectiveness of the public company auditing profession. The ACAP report addressed a number of longstanding issues and emerging developments at a critical time in history for the auditing profession and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). As the first comprehensive study of the profession since the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, the report identifies many significant issues for the PCAOB and the profession itself. The report dealt with three primary areas: human capital issues impacting the auditing profession, audit firm structure and finances, and audit firm concentration and competition. The report contains numerous recommendations directed toward regulators, academics, the auditing profession, and other stakeholders. This paper provides updated information about the numerous actions taken on sixteen ACAP recommendations that refer to or involve the PCAOB. Given the amount of effort related to these recommendations, it seems reasonable to ask, “Are we there yet?” But this is not the correct question, because we should never become complacent in thinking that we have made sufficient progress or completed the necessary actions to achieve and maintain high quality auditing. Since the time ACAP report was written, risks to audit quality have changed. The PCAOB continues to focus on areas raised in the ACAP report. While key issues raised in the ACAP report remain relevant, audit firms and audit regulators must be insightful and forward-looking to detect new and emerging risks so that timely actions can be taken to ensure reliable, high quality auditing to support the capital markets and protect investors. Numerous opportunities for future research exist in evaluating the impact of actions taken on the ACAP recommendations, including to what extent the actions have accomplished the original objectives and whether unanticipated consequences have occurred or additional actions might be needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 42-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.004","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are we there yet? Protecting investors by securing a strong auditing profession into the future\",\"authors\":\"Jeanette M. Franzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In 2008, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP) issued a report with findings and recommendations to address the sustainability and effectiveness of the public company auditing profession. The ACAP report addressed a number of longstanding issues and emerging developments at a critical time in history for the auditing profession and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). As the first comprehensive study of the profession since the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, the report identifies many significant issues for the PCAOB and the profession itself. The report dealt with three primary areas: human capital issues impacting the auditing profession, audit firm structure and finances, and audit firm concentration and competition. The report contains numerous recommendations directed toward regulators, academics, the auditing profession, and other stakeholders. This paper provides updated information about the numerous actions taken on sixteen ACAP recommendations that refer to or involve the PCAOB. Given the amount of effort related to these recommendations, it seems reasonable to ask, “Are we there yet?” But this is not the correct question, because we should never become complacent in thinking that we have made sufficient progress or completed the necessary actions to achieve and maintain high quality auditing. Since the time ACAP report was written, risks to audit quality have changed. The PCAOB continues to focus on areas raised in the ACAP report. While key issues raised in the ACAP report remain relevant, audit firms and audit regulators must be insightful and forward-looking to detect new and emerging risks so that timely actions can be taken to ensure reliable, high quality auditing to support the capital markets and protect investors. Numerous opportunities for future research exist in evaluating the impact of actions taken on the ACAP recommendations, including to what extent the actions have accomplished the original objectives and whether unanticipated consequences have occurred or additional actions might be needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.004\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045716000059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045716000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

2008年,美国财政部审计职业咨询委员会(ACAP)发布了一份报告,提出了解决上市公司审计职业的可持续性和有效性的调查结果和建议。ACAP的报告阐述了审计行业和上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)在历史关键时刻的一些长期存在的问题和新发展。作为2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)颁布以来对会计师行业的首次全面研究,该报告指出了PCAOB和会计师行业本身面临的许多重大问题。该报告涉及三个主要领域:影响审计职业的人力资本问题、审计事务所的结构和财务、审计事务所的集中和竞争。该报告包含了针对监管机构、学术界、审计行业和其他利益相关者的许多建议。本文提供了关于16项ACAP建议所采取的众多行动的最新信息,这些建议涉及或涉及PCAOB。考虑到与这些建议相关的工作量,似乎有理由问:“我们做到了吗?”但这不是一个正确的问题,因为我们永远不应该自满,认为我们已经取得了足够的进展或完成了必要的行动,以实现和保持高质量的审计。自ACAP报告撰写以来,审计质量的风险发生了变化。PCAOB继续关注ACAP报告中提出的领域。虽然ACAP报告中提出的关键问题仍然具有相关性,但审计公司和审计监管机构必须具有洞察力和前瞻性,以发现新的和正在出现的风险,以便及时采取行动,确保可靠、高质量的审计,以支持资本市场和保护投资者。在评价对ACAP建议所采取的行动的影响方面,存在着许多未来研究的机会,包括这些行动在多大程度上实现了最初的目标,以及是否发生了意想不到的后果或可能需要采取额外的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are we there yet? Protecting investors by securing a strong auditing profession into the future

In 2008, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP) issued a report with findings and recommendations to address the sustainability and effectiveness of the public company auditing profession. The ACAP report addressed a number of longstanding issues and emerging developments at a critical time in history for the auditing profession and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). As the first comprehensive study of the profession since the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, the report identifies many significant issues for the PCAOB and the profession itself. The report dealt with three primary areas: human capital issues impacting the auditing profession, audit firm structure and finances, and audit firm concentration and competition. The report contains numerous recommendations directed toward regulators, academics, the auditing profession, and other stakeholders. This paper provides updated information about the numerous actions taken on sixteen ACAP recommendations that refer to or involve the PCAOB. Given the amount of effort related to these recommendations, it seems reasonable to ask, “Are we there yet?” But this is not the correct question, because we should never become complacent in thinking that we have made sufficient progress or completed the necessary actions to achieve and maintain high quality auditing. Since the time ACAP report was written, risks to audit quality have changed. The PCAOB continues to focus on areas raised in the ACAP report. While key issues raised in the ACAP report remain relevant, audit firms and audit regulators must be insightful and forward-looking to detect new and emerging risks so that timely actions can be taken to ensure reliable, high quality auditing to support the capital markets and protect investors. Numerous opportunities for future research exist in evaluating the impact of actions taken on the ACAP recommendations, including to what extent the actions have accomplished the original objectives and whether unanticipated consequences have occurred or additional actions might be needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1