开发初级保健质量改进的成功模式:农村、城市和考帕帕毛利组织的比较案例研究。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Canadian Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1071/HC23046
Jane Cullen, Paul Childerhouse, Nihal Jayamaha, Lynn McBain
{"title":"开发初级保健质量改进的成功模式:农村、城市和考帕帕毛利组织的比较案例研究。","authors":"Jane Cullen, Paul Childerhouse, Nihal Jayamaha, Lynn McBain","doi":"10.1071/HC23046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Primary care is under pressure to achieve accessible, equitable, quality health care, while being increasingly under resourced. There is a need to understand factors that influence quality improvement (QI) to support a high-performing primary care system. Literature highlights the impact of context on QI but there is little primary care research on this topic. Aim This qualitative case study research seeks to discover the contextual factors influencing QI in primary care, and how the relationships between contextual factors, the QI initiative, and the implementation process influence outcomes. Methods The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to frame this qualitative study exploring primary care experiences in depth. Six sites were selected to provide a sample of rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori settings. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews and compared and contrasted with the organisational documents and data provided by participants. Results Cases reported success in achieving improved outcomes for patients, practices, and staff. Strong internal cultures of 'Clan' and 'Adhocracy' typologies supported teamwork, distributed leadership, and a learning climate to facilitate iterative sensemaking activities. To varying degrees, external network relationships provided resources, knowledge, and support. Discussion Organisations were motivated by a combination of patient/community need and organisational culture. Network relationships assisted to varying degrees depending on need. Engaged and distributed leadership based on teamwork was observed, where leadership was shared and emerged at different levels and times as the need arose. A learning climate was supported to enable iterative sensemaking activities to achieve success.</p>","PeriodicalId":9483,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a model for primary care quality improvement success: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori organisations.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Cullen, Paul Childerhouse, Nihal Jayamaha, Lynn McBain\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HC23046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Primary care is under pressure to achieve accessible, equitable, quality health care, while being increasingly under resourced. There is a need to understand factors that influence quality improvement (QI) to support a high-performing primary care system. Literature highlights the impact of context on QI but there is little primary care research on this topic. Aim This qualitative case study research seeks to discover the contextual factors influencing QI in primary care, and how the relationships between contextual factors, the QI initiative, and the implementation process influence outcomes. Methods The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to frame this qualitative study exploring primary care experiences in depth. Six sites were selected to provide a sample of rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori settings. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews and compared and contrasted with the organisational documents and data provided by participants. Results Cases reported success in achieving improved outcomes for patients, practices, and staff. Strong internal cultures of 'Clan' and 'Adhocracy' typologies supported teamwork, distributed leadership, and a learning climate to facilitate iterative sensemaking activities. To varying degrees, external network relationships provided resources, knowledge, and support. Discussion Organisations were motivated by a combination of patient/community need and organisational culture. Network relationships assisted to varying degrees depending on need. Engaged and distributed leadership based on teamwork was observed, where leadership was shared and emerged at different levels and times as the need arose. A learning climate was supported to enable iterative sensemaking activities to achieve success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Forest Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"333-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Forest Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 初级医疗面临着实现可获得的、公平的、高质量的医疗保健的压力,同时资源也越来越不足。我们有必要了解影响质量改进(QI)的因素,以支持高绩效的初级医疗系统。文献强调了环境对质量改进的影响,但有关这一主题的初级医疗研究却很少。目的 本定性案例研究旨在发现影响初级医疗质量改进的背景因素,以及背景因素、质量改进措施和实施过程之间的关系如何影响结果。方法 采用实施研究综合框架来构建这项深入探讨初级保健经验的定性研究。研究选取了六个地点,以提供农村、城市和考帕帕毛利环境的样本。通过半结构式访谈收集定性数据,并与组织文件和参与者提供的数据进行比较和对比。结果 案例报告了在改善患者、诊所和员工的治疗效果方面取得的成功。强大的 "Clan "和 "Adhocracy "型内部文化支持团队合作、分布式领导以及促进迭代感知活动的学习氛围。外部网络关系在不同程度上提供了资源、知识和支持。讨论 组织的动力来自病人/社区的需求和组织文化。网络关系根据需要提供不同程度的协助。在团队合作的基础上,我们观察到了参与式和分布式的领导力,其中领导力是共享的,并根据需要在不同层面和时间出现。学习氛围得到支持,使迭代感知活动取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a model for primary care quality improvement success: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori organisations.

Introduction Primary care is under pressure to achieve accessible, equitable, quality health care, while being increasingly under resourced. There is a need to understand factors that influence quality improvement (QI) to support a high-performing primary care system. Literature highlights the impact of context on QI but there is little primary care research on this topic. Aim This qualitative case study research seeks to discover the contextual factors influencing QI in primary care, and how the relationships between contextual factors, the QI initiative, and the implementation process influence outcomes. Methods The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to frame this qualitative study exploring primary care experiences in depth. Six sites were selected to provide a sample of rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori settings. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews and compared and contrasted with the organisational documents and data provided by participants. Results Cases reported success in achieving improved outcomes for patients, practices, and staff. Strong internal cultures of 'Clan' and 'Adhocracy' typologies supported teamwork, distributed leadership, and a learning climate to facilitate iterative sensemaking activities. To varying degrees, external network relationships provided resources, knowledge, and support. Discussion Organisations were motivated by a combination of patient/community need and organisational culture. Network relationships assisted to varying degrees depending on need. Engaged and distributed leadership based on teamwork was observed, where leadership was shared and emerged at different levels and times as the need arose. A learning climate was supported to enable iterative sensemaking activities to achieve success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, the Canadian Journal of Forest Research is a monthly journal that features articles, reviews, notes and concept papers on a broad spectrum of forest sciences, including biometrics, conservation, disturbances, ecology, economics, entomology, genetics, hydrology, management, nutrient cycling, pathology, physiology, remote sensing, silviculture, social sciences, soils, stand dynamics, and wood science, all in relation to the understanding or management of ecosystem services. It also publishes special issues dedicated to a topic of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Potential replacement understory woody plants for Robinia pseudoacacia plantations: Species composition and vertical distribution pattern Which factors influence consumers’ selection of wood as a building material for houses? Can partial-cut harvesting be used to extend the availability of terrestrial forage lichens in late-seral pine-lichen woodlands? Evidence from the Lewes Marsh (southern Yukon) silvicultural systems trial. Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Lifting the Zero COVID-19 Policy in China. Modelling diameter at breast height distribution of jack pine and black spruce natural stands in eastern Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1