D. Kapur, A. Gaurav, K. Khoiwal, S. Chowdhuri, S. Panda, Smrati Sabnani, J. Chaturvedi
{"title":"“看和治疗”提倡的方法宫颈癌前病变-北印度转诊中心为基础的随机对照试验","authors":"D. Kapur, A. Gaurav, K. Khoiwal, S. Chowdhuri, S. Panda, Smrati Sabnani, J. Chaturvedi","doi":"10.31557/apjcb.2022.7.3.225-231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To establish the comparability of two step approach of See and treat with the conventional three step approach In management of Precancerous lesions of the cervix. Methods: A Randomised controlled Trial was conducted in AIIMS Rishikesh over a period of one year (2020-2021). All women presenting to OPD in age group 25-60 years were screened with PAP smear and per speculum examination, and women with Abnormal PAP smear or clinically unhealthy cervix were subjected to colposcopy. Reid and Swede scores were calculated and colposcopy guided biopsy taken. Women with CIN2/3 on either of the colposcopy scores were randomized to two or three step approach. Women falling into two step approach (group A) underwent LEEP in the same sitting while the latter group (group B) was told to follow up with histopathology reports for further management.The final histopathological diagnosis and LEEP results were compared. Results: Overtreatment rates were 22% in see and treat approach, distributed as 3.6% in HSIL + ASC_H group and 33 % in LSIL patients. None were lost to treatment in this group. 39 out of 50 women in Group B needed definitive treatment after their biopsy results and 48% of them were lost to follow up. 72% were adequately treated in group A while only 22 % could be adequately treated in Group B. Conclusion: It can thus be safely concluded that despite the risk of overtreatment, a two step approach should be considered for preventive management, especially considering the rate of loss to follow up in three step approach. This study thus advocates the use of See and Treat protocol, especially in the high-grade cytology lesions. IN low risk cases too, the study proposes that see and treat protocol can be used, albeit with good clinical judgement. Offering opportunities to reduce suffering associated with the eminently preventable cervical cancer is an ethical imperative and the SEE and TREAT approach is an attempt in that early preventive direction. ","PeriodicalId":8848,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“See and Treat” an Advocated Approach for Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix- A North Indian Referral Center Based Randomized Control Trial\",\"authors\":\"D. Kapur, A. Gaurav, K. Khoiwal, S. Chowdhuri, S. Panda, Smrati Sabnani, J. Chaturvedi\",\"doi\":\"10.31557/apjcb.2022.7.3.225-231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To establish the comparability of two step approach of See and treat with the conventional three step approach In management of Precancerous lesions of the cervix. Methods: A Randomised controlled Trial was conducted in AIIMS Rishikesh over a period of one year (2020-2021). All women presenting to OPD in age group 25-60 years were screened with PAP smear and per speculum examination, and women with Abnormal PAP smear or clinically unhealthy cervix were subjected to colposcopy. Reid and Swede scores were calculated and colposcopy guided biopsy taken. Women with CIN2/3 on either of the colposcopy scores were randomized to two or three step approach. Women falling into two step approach (group A) underwent LEEP in the same sitting while the latter group (group B) was told to follow up with histopathology reports for further management.The final histopathological diagnosis and LEEP results were compared. Results: Overtreatment rates were 22% in see and treat approach, distributed as 3.6% in HSIL + ASC_H group and 33 % in LSIL patients. None were lost to treatment in this group. 39 out of 50 women in Group B needed definitive treatment after their biopsy results and 48% of them were lost to follow up. 72% were adequately treated in group A while only 22 % could be adequately treated in Group B. Conclusion: It can thus be safely concluded that despite the risk of overtreatment, a two step approach should be considered for preventive management, especially considering the rate of loss to follow up in three step approach. This study thus advocates the use of See and Treat protocol, especially in the high-grade cytology lesions. IN low risk cases too, the study proposes that see and treat protocol can be used, albeit with good clinical judgement. Offering opportunities to reduce suffering associated with the eminently preventable cervical cancer is an ethical imperative and the SEE and TREAT approach is an attempt in that early preventive direction. \",\"PeriodicalId\":8848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2022.7.3.225-231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2022.7.3.225-231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨观察与治疗两步入路与常规三步入路治疗宫颈癌前病变的可比性。方法:在AIIMS Rishikesh进行了一项为期一年(2020-2021)的随机对照试验。所有就诊于OPD的年龄在25-60岁之间的女性都接受了PAP涂片检查和阴道镜检查,宫颈涂片异常或临床宫颈不健康的女性接受了阴道镜检查。计算Reid和Swede评分,并进行阴道镜引导活检。阴道镜评分为CIN2/3的女性随机分为两步或三步方法。分为两步法的女性(A组)在相同的坐姿下接受LEEP,而后一组(B组)则被告知随访组织病理学报告以进一步处理。将最终的组织病理学诊断与LEEP结果进行比较。结果:观察+治疗方法的过度治疗率为22%,HSIL + ASC_H组为3.6%,LSIL组为33%。该组患者均未因治疗而死亡。B组50名妇女中有39名在活检结果后需要明确治疗,48%的妇女失去了随访。结论:尽管存在过度治疗的风险,但仍应考虑采取两步法进行预防管理,特别是考虑到三步法随访的损失率。因此,本研究提倡使用See and Treat方案,特别是在高级别细胞学病变中。在低风险病例中,该研究也提出,尽管需要良好的临床判断,但也可以使用“即诊即治”方案。提供机会减少与明显可预防的宫颈癌有关的痛苦是一项伦理责任,SEE和TREAT方法是朝着早期预防方向的一种尝试。
“See and Treat” an Advocated Approach for Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix- A North Indian Referral Center Based Randomized Control Trial
Objective: To establish the comparability of two step approach of See and treat with the conventional three step approach In management of Precancerous lesions of the cervix. Methods: A Randomised controlled Trial was conducted in AIIMS Rishikesh over a period of one year (2020-2021). All women presenting to OPD in age group 25-60 years were screened with PAP smear and per speculum examination, and women with Abnormal PAP smear or clinically unhealthy cervix were subjected to colposcopy. Reid and Swede scores were calculated and colposcopy guided biopsy taken. Women with CIN2/3 on either of the colposcopy scores were randomized to two or three step approach. Women falling into two step approach (group A) underwent LEEP in the same sitting while the latter group (group B) was told to follow up with histopathology reports for further management.The final histopathological diagnosis and LEEP results were compared. Results: Overtreatment rates were 22% in see and treat approach, distributed as 3.6% in HSIL + ASC_H group and 33 % in LSIL patients. None were lost to treatment in this group. 39 out of 50 women in Group B needed definitive treatment after their biopsy results and 48% of them were lost to follow up. 72% were adequately treated in group A while only 22 % could be adequately treated in Group B. Conclusion: It can thus be safely concluded that despite the risk of overtreatment, a two step approach should be considered for preventive management, especially considering the rate of loss to follow up in three step approach. This study thus advocates the use of See and Treat protocol, especially in the high-grade cytology lesions. IN low risk cases too, the study proposes that see and treat protocol can be used, albeit with good clinical judgement. Offering opportunities to reduce suffering associated with the eminently preventable cervical cancer is an ethical imperative and the SEE and TREAT approach is an attempt in that early preventive direction.