{"title":"CORR Insights®:康涅狄格州的肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心根据政策和地点限制患者使用医疗补助保险。","authors":"R. Blasier","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States continues to struggle with its ability to provide health care for all of its residents and citizens. Healthcare costs for the government, employers, and individuals continue to rise quickly. Because medical care, drugs, and medical supplies generally are provided on a for-profit basis, it has been difficult to find efficiencies. As there is no universal coverage in the United States, individual coverage is necessary, and providing this for those who cannot afford it has been a real challenge. Enacted in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (sometimes called Obamacare) sought to provide care for more of the US population. Much of this new coverage has occurred through Medicaid expansion, by extending Medicaid eligibility to individuals with annual incomes below 133 percent of the federal poverty level (USD 15,880 for an individual or USD 32,319 for a family of four in 2016) who are under 65 years of age [3, 8]. In June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled to make Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. Most but not all states have expanded their Medicaid program. While this coverage now includes more people, it has not been a panacea; reimbursement for providers is low, and there is considerable administrative burden [4]. As a result, while more lives are covered, actual access to care may not be increased as providers are not as likely to see and treat patients with Medicaid coverage as they are patients with commercial insurance. Increased coverage does not necessarily lead to increased access to care. A relatively new concept in the provision of musculoskeletal care is the musculoskeletal urgent care center which, of course is of interest to orthopaedic surgeons. Will these centers help to increase access to care and result in efficiencies that benefit all? Wiznia and colleagues [10] interviewed owners of musculoskeletal urgent care centers throughout Connecticut. They found that most musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut do not accept patients with Medicaid insurance and have similar or stricter Medicaid policies to those of the groups that own them. Additionally, musculoskeletal urgent care centers generally were located in more-affluent neighborhoods. The authors felt that private practices are using musculoskeletal urgent care centers to capture patients with more favorable insurance. A major causative factor seems to be the relatively low Medicaid reimbursement rates in Connecticut (as well as other states). At first glance, musculoskeletal urgent care centers appear to offer marked benefits compared to services offered at primary care offices and emergency rooms in the provision of acute care for musculoskeletal conditions. These include shorter patient wait times, potentially increased patient satisfaction and more cost-effective and specialized care [1, 7]. While urgent care centers have This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location” by Wiznia and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000957. The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. R. D. Blasier MD, FRCS(C), MBA (✉), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock AR 72205, Email: blasierrobertd@uams.edu","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORR Insights®: Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location.\",\"authors\":\"R. Blasier\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States continues to struggle with its ability to provide health care for all of its residents and citizens. Healthcare costs for the government, employers, and individuals continue to rise quickly. Because medical care, drugs, and medical supplies generally are provided on a for-profit basis, it has been difficult to find efficiencies. As there is no universal coverage in the United States, individual coverage is necessary, and providing this for those who cannot afford it has been a real challenge. Enacted in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (sometimes called Obamacare) sought to provide care for more of the US population. Much of this new coverage has occurred through Medicaid expansion, by extending Medicaid eligibility to individuals with annual incomes below 133 percent of the federal poverty level (USD 15,880 for an individual or USD 32,319 for a family of four in 2016) who are under 65 years of age [3, 8]. In June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled to make Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. Most but not all states have expanded their Medicaid program. While this coverage now includes more people, it has not been a panacea; reimbursement for providers is low, and there is considerable administrative burden [4]. As a result, while more lives are covered, actual access to care may not be increased as providers are not as likely to see and treat patients with Medicaid coverage as they are patients with commercial insurance. Increased coverage does not necessarily lead to increased access to care. A relatively new concept in the provision of musculoskeletal care is the musculoskeletal urgent care center which, of course is of interest to orthopaedic surgeons. Will these centers help to increase access to care and result in efficiencies that benefit all? Wiznia and colleagues [10] interviewed owners of musculoskeletal urgent care centers throughout Connecticut. They found that most musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut do not accept patients with Medicaid insurance and have similar or stricter Medicaid policies to those of the groups that own them. Additionally, musculoskeletal urgent care centers generally were located in more-affluent neighborhoods. The authors felt that private practices are using musculoskeletal urgent care centers to capture patients with more favorable insurance. A major causative factor seems to be the relatively low Medicaid reimbursement rates in Connecticut (as well as other states). At first glance, musculoskeletal urgent care centers appear to offer marked benefits compared to services offered at primary care offices and emergency rooms in the provision of acute care for musculoskeletal conditions. These include shorter patient wait times, potentially increased patient satisfaction and more cost-effective and specialized care [1, 7]. While urgent care centers have This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location” by Wiznia and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000957. The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. R. D. Blasier MD, FRCS(C), MBA (✉), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock AR 72205, Email: blasierrobertd@uams.edu\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
美国继续在为其所有居民和公民提供医疗保健的能力上挣扎。政府、雇主和个人的医疗成本继续快速上升。由于医疗保健、药品和医疗用品一般都是以营利为基础提供的,因此很难找到效率。由于美国没有全民保险,个人保险是必要的,为那些负担不起的人提供保险是一项真正的挑战。2010年颁布的《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(有时被称为奥巴马医改)试图为更多的美国人提供医疗服务。这一新的覆盖范围大部分是通过扩大医疗补助来实现的,将医疗补助资格扩大到年收入低于联邦贫困线133%(2016年个人为15,880美元,四口之家为32,319美元)的65岁以下个人[3,8]。2012年6月,最高法院裁定,各州自愿扩大医疗补助计划。大多数但不是所有的州都扩大了他们的医疗补助计划。虽然这一覆盖范围现在包括了更多的人,但它并不是万灵药;医疗服务提供者的报销很低,而且有相当大的行政负担。因此,虽然更多的生命被覆盖,但实际获得护理的机会可能不会增加,因为提供者不太可能看到和治疗有医疗补助的病人,因为他们是有商业保险的病人。扩大覆盖面并不一定会增加获得医疗服务的机会。提供肌肉骨骼护理的一个相对较新的概念是肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心,这当然是骨科医生感兴趣的。这些中心是否有助于增加获得医疗服务的机会,并产生使所有人受益的效率?维茨尼亚和他的同事采访了康涅狄格州肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心的老板。他们发现康涅狄格州的大多数肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心不接受有医疗补助保险的患者,并且与那些拥有医疗补助保险的团体有类似或更严格的医疗补助政策。此外,肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心通常位于较富裕的社区。作者认为,私人诊所正在利用肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心来吸引有更优惠保险的患者。一个主要的致病因素似乎是康涅狄格州(以及其他州)相对较低的医疗补助报销率。乍一看,与初级保健办公室和急诊室提供的肌肉骨骼疾病急性护理服务相比,肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心似乎提供了明显的好处。这些措施包括缩短患者等待时间,潜在地提高患者满意度,以及更具成本效益和专业化的护理[1,7]。虽然紧急护理中心有此CORR见解是对Wiznia及其同事的文章“康涅狄格州肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心根据政策和位置限制医疗补助保险患者”的评论:DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000957。提交人证明,他本人及其直系亲属均无任何可能与所提交文章产生利益冲突的商业协会(如咨询公司、股票所有权、股权、专利/许可安排等)。所表达的观点是作者的观点,不反映CORR或骨关节外科医生协会的观点或政策。dr . D. Blasier MD, FRCS(C), MBA (MD),美国阿肯色大学医学院骨科,4301 W。Markham,小石城ar72205,电子邮件:blasierrobertd@uams.edu
CORR Insights®: Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location.
The United States continues to struggle with its ability to provide health care for all of its residents and citizens. Healthcare costs for the government, employers, and individuals continue to rise quickly. Because medical care, drugs, and medical supplies generally are provided on a for-profit basis, it has been difficult to find efficiencies. As there is no universal coverage in the United States, individual coverage is necessary, and providing this for those who cannot afford it has been a real challenge. Enacted in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (sometimes called Obamacare) sought to provide care for more of the US population. Much of this new coverage has occurred through Medicaid expansion, by extending Medicaid eligibility to individuals with annual incomes below 133 percent of the federal poverty level (USD 15,880 for an individual or USD 32,319 for a family of four in 2016) who are under 65 years of age [3, 8]. In June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled to make Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. Most but not all states have expanded their Medicaid program. While this coverage now includes more people, it has not been a panacea; reimbursement for providers is low, and there is considerable administrative burden [4]. As a result, while more lives are covered, actual access to care may not be increased as providers are not as likely to see and treat patients with Medicaid coverage as they are patients with commercial insurance. Increased coverage does not necessarily lead to increased access to care. A relatively new concept in the provision of musculoskeletal care is the musculoskeletal urgent care center which, of course is of interest to orthopaedic surgeons. Will these centers help to increase access to care and result in efficiencies that benefit all? Wiznia and colleagues [10] interviewed owners of musculoskeletal urgent care centers throughout Connecticut. They found that most musculoskeletal urgent care centers in Connecticut do not accept patients with Medicaid insurance and have similar or stricter Medicaid policies to those of the groups that own them. Additionally, musculoskeletal urgent care centers generally were located in more-affluent neighborhoods. The authors felt that private practices are using musculoskeletal urgent care centers to capture patients with more favorable insurance. A major causative factor seems to be the relatively low Medicaid reimbursement rates in Connecticut (as well as other states). At first glance, musculoskeletal urgent care centers appear to offer marked benefits compared to services offered at primary care offices and emergency rooms in the provision of acute care for musculoskeletal conditions. These include shorter patient wait times, potentially increased patient satisfaction and more cost-effective and specialized care [1, 7]. While urgent care centers have This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Musculoskeletal Urgent Care Centers in Connecticut Restrict Patients with Medicaid Insurance Based on Policy and Location” by Wiznia and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000957. The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. R. D. Blasier MD, FRCS(C), MBA (✉), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Little Rock AR 72205, Email: blasierrobertd@uams.edu