{"title":"用科学计量指标评价机械工程研究成果:印度、日本和韩国的比较研究","authors":"D. Pattanashetti, N. Harinarayana","doi":"10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly out - come of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Ja - pan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index – Web of Science for the pe - riod 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its pub - lications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index","PeriodicalId":37582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice","volume":"38 1","pages":"62-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Mechanical Engineering Research Output using Scientometric Indicators: A Comparative Study of India, Japan, and South Korea\",\"authors\":\"D. Pattanashetti, N. Harinarayana\",\"doi\":\"10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly out - come of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Ja - pan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index – Web of Science for the pe - riod 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its pub - lications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index\",\"PeriodicalId\":37582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"62-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究考察了来自印度、日本和韩国的机械工程研究成果的不同参数,包括增长指数、合作指数和活动指数。本研究的目的是透过分析方法来了解机械工程的整体发展,并应用于研究对象国家的学术成果。本研究集中分析了印度、日本和韩国发表的论文,并仅限于2000年至2014年被科学引文索引- Web of Science收录的论文。印度、日本和韩国的论文数与引用数之比分别为20,836篇和1,97,679篇;24494: 04393;和30,578:2000-2014年期间分别为2,66,902。研究结果显示,日本机械工程方面的出版物数量有所下降,而其他两个国家的出版物数量呈上升趋势。印度的出版物在15年的时间里增加了两倍,另一方面,韩国的出版物在同样的时间里增加了一倍。在几乎所有的科学和技术领域,合作的趋势都在增加。但是,合作的程度和增长速度在不同学科之间、同一学科的不同学科之间、一个国家与另一个国家之间都有所不同。本研究分析了机械工程领域研究出版物的增长情况,包括作者分布、合作指数、知名期刊和活动指数
Assessment of Mechanical Engineering Research Output using Scientometric Indicators: A Comparative Study of India, Japan, and South Korea
This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly out - come of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Ja - pan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index – Web of Science for the pe - riod 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its pub - lications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice (JISTaP) is an international journal that aims at publishing original studies, review papers and brief communications on information science theory and practice. The journal provides an international forum for practical as well as theoretical research in the interdisciplinary areas of information science, such as information processing and management, knowledge organization, scholarly communication and bibliometrics. To foster scholarly communication among researchers and practitioners of library and information science around the globe, JISTaP offers a no-fee open access publishing venue where a team of dedicated editors, reviewers and staff members volunteer their services to ensure rapid dissemination and communication of scholarly works that make significant contributions. In a modern society, where information production and consumption grow at an astronomical rate, the science of information management, organization, and analysis is invaluable in effective utilization of information. The key objective of the journal is to foster research that can contribute to advancements and innovations in the theory and practice of information and library science so as to promote timely application of the findings from scientific investigations to everyday life. Recognizing the importance of the global perspective with understanding of region-specific issues, JISTaP encourages submissions of manuscripts that discuss global implications of regional findings as well as regional implications of global findings.