抗癫痫药物的基因毒性作用。文献综述

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecological genetics Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.17816/ecogen109400
N. Eremina, A. Zhanataev, A. Durnev
{"title":"抗癫痫药物的基因毒性作用。文献综述","authors":"N. Eremina, A. Zhanataev, A. Durnev","doi":"10.17816/ecogen109400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the selected criteria data from studies of the genotoxic activity of antiepileptic drugs in eukaryotic test systems in vitro and in vivo, performed by DNA comet assay, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei assays, published in the period 19952022, were selected and summarized. \nAmong the 20 drugs reviewed, for one drug (N03AA05 Benzobarbital), there are no data on studies of genotoxic activity; for 7 drugs information is presented only as a summary on the FDA and EMA websites without primary data and information on experimental designs. Among the remaining 12 drugs, only three drugs (phenobarbital, valproic acid and levetiracetam) have information on in vivo studies, both by DNA damage assay and by cytogenetic methods. Based on known publications, it is impossible to draw reasonable conclusions about the genotoxic potential of individual drugs. The available data are fragmentary, incomplete and contradictory. It remains to state the facts of detection of genotoxic effects in individual drugs in separate studies. In general, there is no doubt about the potential genotoxic hazard of this group the drugs in. \nAdditional studies are needed to clarify the data on the genotoxicity of antiepileptic drugs including beyond the standard protocols. In the course of their implementation, one should take into account the possible tissue-specific manifestation of antiepileptics genotoxicity, as indicated by the facts of genotoxic effects detection in tissue cells that are not targets in classical genotoxic studies. The expediency of objectifying approaches when choosing a drug for safe therapy, taking into account information about its genotoxicity, is emphasized, and the prospects for possible studies on antigenotoxic prophylaxis in patients with epilepsy are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":11431,"journal":{"name":"Ecological genetics","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotoxic effects of antiepileptic drugs. Literature review\",\"authors\":\"N. Eremina, A. Zhanataev, A. Durnev\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/ecogen109400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the selected criteria data from studies of the genotoxic activity of antiepileptic drugs in eukaryotic test systems in vitro and in vivo, performed by DNA comet assay, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei assays, published in the period 19952022, were selected and summarized. \\nAmong the 20 drugs reviewed, for one drug (N03AA05 Benzobarbital), there are no data on studies of genotoxic activity; for 7 drugs information is presented only as a summary on the FDA and EMA websites without primary data and information on experimental designs. Among the remaining 12 drugs, only three drugs (phenobarbital, valproic acid and levetiracetam) have information on in vivo studies, both by DNA damage assay and by cytogenetic methods. Based on known publications, it is impossible to draw reasonable conclusions about the genotoxic potential of individual drugs. The available data are fragmentary, incomplete and contradictory. It remains to state the facts of detection of genotoxic effects in individual drugs in separate studies. In general, there is no doubt about the potential genotoxic hazard of this group the drugs in. \\nAdditional studies are needed to clarify the data on the genotoxicity of antiepileptic drugs including beyond the standard protocols. In the course of their implementation, one should take into account the possible tissue-specific manifestation of antiepileptics genotoxicity, as indicated by the facts of genotoxic effects detection in tissue cells that are not targets in classical genotoxic studies. The expediency of objectifying approaches when choosing a drug for safe therapy, taking into account information about its genotoxicity, is emphasized, and the prospects for possible studies on antigenotoxic prophylaxis in patients with epilepsy are pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen109400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen109400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据1995年至2022年期间发表的真核试验系统中通过DNA彗星法、染色体畸变法和微核法进行的抗癫痫药物基因毒性活性研究的选定标准数据,进行了选择和总结。在审评的20种药物中,有一种药物(N03AA05苯并巴比妥)没有基因毒性活性的研究数据;7种药物的信息仅作为FDA和EMA网站上的摘要呈现,没有原始数据和实验设计信息。在剩下的12种药物中,只有3种药物(苯巴比妥、丙戊酸和左乙拉西坦)有通过DNA损伤测定和细胞遗传学方法进行体内研究的信息。根据已知的出版物,不可能对单个药物的潜在遗传毒性得出合理的结论。现有的数据是零碎的、不完整的和相互矛盾的。在单独的研究中对单个药物的基因毒性作用的检测事实仍有待说明。总的来说,这类药物的潜在遗传毒性危害是毫无疑问的。需要进一步的研究来澄清抗癫痫药物的遗传毒性数据,包括超出标准方案的数据。在实施过程中,人们应该考虑到抗癫痫药物遗传毒性可能的组织特异性表现,正如在组织细胞中检测到的遗传毒性效应所表明的那样,这些组织细胞不是经典基因毒性研究的目标。在选择一种药物进行安全治疗时,考虑到其遗传毒性的信息,强调了客观化方法的便利性,并指出了癫痫患者抗基因毒性预防研究的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genotoxic effects of antiepileptic drugs. Literature review
Based on the selected criteria data from studies of the genotoxic activity of antiepileptic drugs in eukaryotic test systems in vitro and in vivo, performed by DNA comet assay, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei assays, published in the period 19952022, were selected and summarized. Among the 20 drugs reviewed, for one drug (N03AA05 Benzobarbital), there are no data on studies of genotoxic activity; for 7 drugs information is presented only as a summary on the FDA and EMA websites without primary data and information on experimental designs. Among the remaining 12 drugs, only three drugs (phenobarbital, valproic acid and levetiracetam) have information on in vivo studies, both by DNA damage assay and by cytogenetic methods. Based on known publications, it is impossible to draw reasonable conclusions about the genotoxic potential of individual drugs. The available data are fragmentary, incomplete and contradictory. It remains to state the facts of detection of genotoxic effects in individual drugs in separate studies. In general, there is no doubt about the potential genotoxic hazard of this group the drugs in. Additional studies are needed to clarify the data on the genotoxicity of antiepileptic drugs including beyond the standard protocols. In the course of their implementation, one should take into account the possible tissue-specific manifestation of antiepileptics genotoxicity, as indicated by the facts of genotoxic effects detection in tissue cells that are not targets in classical genotoxic studies. The expediency of objectifying approaches when choosing a drug for safe therapy, taking into account information about its genotoxicity, is emphasized, and the prospects for possible studies on antigenotoxic prophylaxis in patients with epilepsy are pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological genetics
Ecological genetics Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological genetics is an international journal which accepts for consideration original manuscripts that reflect the results of field and experimental studies, and fundamental research of broad conceptual and/or comparative context corresponding to the profile of the Journal. Once a year, the editorial Board reviews and, if necessary, corrects the rules for authors and the journal rubrics.
期刊最新文献
CRISPR/Cas editing of a CPC gene in Arabidopsis thaliana Hairy roots biochemical characteristics of vegetable pea’s morphotype with modified leaf Erratum to “The strong base for using base editing in plants” (doi: 10.17816/ecogen567885) PCR-based genome walking methods (review) Ecological genetics. What is it? 20 years later
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1