复发性卵巢癌维持方案的治疗持续时间、依从性、中断和中断

E. Barber, A. Saiz, N. Engel-Nitz, S. Bunner, K. Wallace
{"title":"复发性卵巢癌维持方案的治疗持续时间、依从性、中断和中断","authors":"E. Barber, A. Saiz, N. Engel-Nitz, S. Bunner, K. Wallace","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2023.05.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical trials have shown that maintenance therapy for ovarian can­cer after response to platinum chemotherapy prolongs progression-free survival. We sought to examine the real-world use of various maintenance therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US patients ≥18 years old with recurrent ovarian cancer utilizing diagnoses from claims data. Patients were identified using a two-step algorithm and if they had ≥2 diagnoses ≥30 days apart between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, a subsequent systemic chemotherapy, and a second-line maintenance thera­py with a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor or bevacizumab. Prev­alence of use for all second-line maintenance therapies was calculated. Treat­ment duration, adherence to treatment, dose decreases, and the time without dose interruption or treatment discontinuation were analyzed between thera­py groups. Results. A total of 1,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 446 (40.8%) subsequently received second-line maintenance treatment: 38 (8.5%) received rucaparib, 110 (24.7%) niraparib, 114 (25.6%) olaparib, and 184 (41.3%) bevacizumab. Average durations of maintenance treatment in days were as follows: olaparib, 187.6 (SD, 178.7); bevacizumab, 185.2 (SD, 149.2); ruca­parib, 147.2 (SD, 155.4); and niraparib, 124.2 (SD, 122.9). Treatment adherence was similar across all therapies (86%-88%). Dose decreases were numerically more common in the niraparib group (28.1%) than in the rucaparib (21.1%) or olapar­ib (20.2%) groups but were not statistically significant (both P > .10). Compared with rucaparib, niraparib was associated with a shorter time to dose interrup­tion or discontinuation (hazard ratio: 3.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1%-12.6%; P = .03). Conclusions. In this cohort, less than half of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer received second-line maintenance therapy with a PARP inhibitor or bevacizumab. Adherence was similar in all PARP inhibitor regimens regardless of dosing schedule, with dose reductions and discontinuations varying between treatments. Niraparib was associated with the shortest time to dose interruption or discontinuation among the agents evaluated.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"69 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Duration, Adherence, Interruptions, and Discontinuations Associated With Maintenance Regimens for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer\",\"authors\":\"E. Barber, A. Saiz, N. Engel-Nitz, S. Bunner, K. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jcp.2023.05.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical trials have shown that maintenance therapy for ovarian can­cer after response to platinum chemotherapy prolongs progression-free survival. We sought to examine the real-world use of various maintenance therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US patients ≥18 years old with recurrent ovarian cancer utilizing diagnoses from claims data. Patients were identified using a two-step algorithm and if they had ≥2 diagnoses ≥30 days apart between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, a subsequent systemic chemotherapy, and a second-line maintenance thera­py with a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor or bevacizumab. Prev­alence of use for all second-line maintenance therapies was calculated. Treat­ment duration, adherence to treatment, dose decreases, and the time without dose interruption or treatment discontinuation were analyzed between thera­py groups. Results. A total of 1,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 446 (40.8%) subsequently received second-line maintenance treatment: 38 (8.5%) received rucaparib, 110 (24.7%) niraparib, 114 (25.6%) olaparib, and 184 (41.3%) bevacizumab. Average durations of maintenance treatment in days were as follows: olaparib, 187.6 (SD, 178.7); bevacizumab, 185.2 (SD, 149.2); ruca­parib, 147.2 (SD, 155.4); and niraparib, 124.2 (SD, 122.9). Treatment adherence was similar across all therapies (86%-88%). Dose decreases were numerically more common in the niraparib group (28.1%) than in the rucaparib (21.1%) or olapar­ib (20.2%) groups but were not statistically significant (both P > .10). Compared with rucaparib, niraparib was associated with a shorter time to dose interrup­tion or discontinuation (hazard ratio: 3.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1%-12.6%; P = .03). Conclusions. In this cohort, less than half of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer received second-line maintenance therapy with a PARP inhibitor or bevacizumab. Adherence was similar in all PARP inhibitor regimens regardless of dosing schedule, with dose reductions and discontinuations varying between treatments. Niraparib was associated with the shortest time to dose interruption or discontinuation among the agents evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"volume\":\"69 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.05.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.05.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床试验表明,对铂类化疗有反应的卵巢癌维持治疗可延长无进展生存期。我们试图研究各种维持疗法对复发性卵巢癌的实际应用。方法。我们对美国≥18岁的复发性卵巢癌患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,利用索赔数据进行诊断。使用两步算法确定患者,如果他们在2010年7月1日至2019年12月31日之间间隔≥30天诊断≥2次,则随后进行全身化疗,并进行二线维持治疗-使用聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂或贝伐单抗。计算所有二线维持治疗的使用率。分析两组患者的治疗时间、治疗依从性、剂量减少、未中断或停止治疗的时间。结果。共有1092名患者符合纳入标准。其中,446人(40.8%)随后接受了二线维持治疗:38人(8.5%)接受了鲁卡帕尼,110人(24.7%)接受了尼拉帕尼,114人(25.6%)接受了奥拉帕尼,184人(41.3%)接受了贝伐单抗。维持治疗的平均持续时间(天)如下:奥拉帕尼,187.6天(SD, 178.7天);贝伐单抗,185.2 (SD, 149.2);ruca-parib, 147.2 (SD, 155.4);尼拉帕尼,124.2 (SD, 122.9)。所有疗法的治疗依从性相似(86%-88%)。剂量减少在尼拉帕尼组(28.1%)比鲁卡帕尼组(21.1%)或奥拉帕尼组(20.2%)更常见,但没有统计学意义(P均为0.10)。与rucaparib相比,niraparib与更短的剂量中断或停药时间相关(风险比:3.7;95%置信区间:1.1%-12.6%;P = .03)。结论。在该队列中,不到一半的复发性卵巢癌患者接受了PARP抑制剂或贝伐单抗的二线维持治疗。无论给药方案如何,所有PARP抑制剂方案的依从性相似,不同治疗的剂量减少和停药情况不同。在评估的药物中,尼拉帕尼与中断或停药的时间最短相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment Duration, Adherence, Interruptions, and Discontinuations Associated With Maintenance Regimens for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Clinical trials have shown that maintenance therapy for ovarian can­cer after response to platinum chemotherapy prolongs progression-free survival. We sought to examine the real-world use of various maintenance therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US patients ≥18 years old with recurrent ovarian cancer utilizing diagnoses from claims data. Patients were identified using a two-step algorithm and if they had ≥2 diagnoses ≥30 days apart between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, a subsequent systemic chemotherapy, and a second-line maintenance thera­py with a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor or bevacizumab. Prev­alence of use for all second-line maintenance therapies was calculated. Treat­ment duration, adherence to treatment, dose decreases, and the time without dose interruption or treatment discontinuation were analyzed between thera­py groups. Results. A total of 1,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 446 (40.8%) subsequently received second-line maintenance treatment: 38 (8.5%) received rucaparib, 110 (24.7%) niraparib, 114 (25.6%) olaparib, and 184 (41.3%) bevacizumab. Average durations of maintenance treatment in days were as follows: olaparib, 187.6 (SD, 178.7); bevacizumab, 185.2 (SD, 149.2); ruca­parib, 147.2 (SD, 155.4); and niraparib, 124.2 (SD, 122.9). Treatment adherence was similar across all therapies (86%-88%). Dose decreases were numerically more common in the niraparib group (28.1%) than in the rucaparib (21.1%) or olapar­ib (20.2%) groups but were not statistically significant (both P > .10). Compared with rucaparib, niraparib was associated with a shorter time to dose interrup­tion or discontinuation (hazard ratio: 3.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1%-12.6%; P = .03). Conclusions. In this cohort, less than half of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer received second-line maintenance therapy with a PARP inhibitor or bevacizumab. Adherence was similar in all PARP inhibitor regimens regardless of dosing schedule, with dose reductions and discontinuations varying between treatments. Niraparib was associated with the shortest time to dose interruption or discontinuation among the agents evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: The Wins, The Challenges, and How We Can Deliver on Personalized Cancer Care Off-Label Use of Precision Oncology Therapeutics in Advanced Solid Cancers Following Identification of Associated Variants via Multicancer Next-Generation Sequencing Panel: A Real-World Evidence Pilot Study NGS Testing in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Leveraging Quality Measurement to Drive Equitable Cancer Care for Transgender Individuals https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/jcp/feature-story/oncology-pathways-drive-adoption-high-quality-treatment-regimens-and-deliver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1